Once again you're comparing a super-nationally appointed commission to a democratically elected parliament. It's not a matter of reading comprehension because what you stated was false information to start with. EU legislation is not comparable to EU member state national legislation and that's just fact. EU member state national MP's are allowed to propose legislation, EU parliament members are not.
Whats so undemocratic about it? Technically Kafein is right. A commissioner is elected into the commission by each state. That is democratic. What dont you like about it? I dont understand why do you keep saying that they arent elected. They clearly are. And they cant serve a single nations or persons interest, so you comparing this to US president appointing his own governments power to whoever he likes is most retarded and couldnt be any more false. So tell me mr "its undemocratic", whose purpose, other than the unions, could they possibly serve if the commission is incapable of serving a single person or nation? A corporations? If every country elects a commissioner who works for Apple than clearly the whole Europe wants to be enslaved by Apple. And we all made that choice democratically.
I still completely do not understand what you do not like. A democratic government of a member state elects a commissioner. That guys all ties to its former government are technically removed. It can only serve the Union. Thats it. And what about those ties to commerce and industry sectors? Those are practically worthless. If over half of the commission has the exactly same ties than thats some reason to be concerned. But that is incredibly unlikely. Because each commissioner comes for each different democratically elected government. If the majority of the EU commission is a fraud, most of the democratic governments of Europe are frauds too, in which case it doesnt really matter anymore, does it.
