Fortunately no one is proposing only trading within the unions.
But something like a Western or Northwestern European union have been an economic advantage for hundreds of years, and particularly so since the industrial revolution.
It has also been realized since about the Kalmar Union and the United Kingdoms of Denmark-Norway that a Nordic union makes fiscal sense (also in recent studies, think the latest one I saw was by a Swedish analyst from 2011), besides the obvious advantages of cultural attunement our industries have supplemented each other very well through most our history. Denmark as historical agricultural and shipping nation, Norway as shipping and raw ressources, Sweden as manpower and raw ressources. In the union times of Denmark and Norway materials flowed from Norway into Denmark where they went into industry and manufacture to the benefit of both nations, and the time of the twin kingdoms are generally regarded as a major practical success by historians. In the modern market these are still our main areas of commercial interest, though they have been spiced up with extensive knowledge-based economies (like precision engineering in Denmark and IT in Sweden) which goes well hand in hand, supranationally.
One of the main reasons we don't have a union anymore, Danish and Swedish power struggles aside, is because of European mainland politics, the major powers always saw it is a goal to keep Scandinavia divided, a Nordic Union would be competition. The Danish state was kept separate to offer free access to the Baltic, and a neutral Sweden as a sort of buffer state between Russia and the West. Denmark and Sweden have for centuries had different foreign policy concerns, with different giants on their doorsteps.
However compatible, I think I would be in favour of the Nordic countries teaming up with the rest of Northwestern Europe.
Sweden, Danemark and Norway can break free of the EU and create a local union.. why does it not happen if its so obvious?
The reasons you invoke to support that it would be a better idea (historical friendship, common culture, economical synergy) can be used to support a larger scheme, like the European Union...
Thats why I dont adhere to your plan, because it is just rhetoric to justify creating a smaller union that would probably be more stable only due to populitistic reasoning, but would create no objective surplus of income or political adherence (with the same administration efficiency).
This is for me, the biggest flaw in the independantist/isolationist view of the world: you can break free of everything on every scale (worldwide, continental, national, regional, local) at the end there is always place for discord and mutiny if one wants to create some.
The hard thing is working up not down. Then of course with the pressure put on the evil EU cucks by the """"""""""thoughtfull and always right bottom"""""""""" of society, maybe one day we will have no other option.
And yes, indeed, fuck the rest. I care more about my "tribe" than other people.
The tribe you refer to has disappeared, you and your fellow fourth reich tribesmen try to recreate it. Thats not exactly the same.
The tribe you refer to has moved on decades ago and started building mankind without even asking you if you're okay with that, and now you mad. We get it.