Why would I take more screenshots? I have one me being an archer scoring 149 points while the next guy in my team had 80, but there were like <40 players and I have scottish sword in a pic so you wouldn't even call me an archer. I only archer when I want to piss people off, like today when you tried to kill me, I pushed you away, came back for my bow and shot you. Or later the same map when I shot you in the back and you got finished off by melee and you even then you kept typing that it's not ranged that killed you but a melee. Here, have some screenshots of archers destroying fun of others.
So the 149 score screenshot you dont want to post based on what youre assuming i would believe (sounds fishy to me). Then you post about me getting shot and then dying, as if thats evidence of archery being op, it indirectly killed me once, as the only infantry left on the map surrounded by multiple others (or whatever the situation was, i want it to sound dramatic so just go with it) yeah im convinced, hit the big red destroy button, an archer managed to make someone die. And then the picture of the archer squad, proving nothing but a bunch of (friends) having fun as a different class in a video game, but apparently this one was more worthy of posting than the 149 points one that couldve actually added something that would actually add to the conversation.
Whats your website K/Ds as ranged in general? I wish there was some statistics on this. K/D of course doesnt count for everything, but it is a good base. Personally when i played archer, i would barely hit 2kd, with the main bulk of kills being with my melee weapon. My winrate probably took a big dip aswell, unfortunately thats not displayed anywhere either. Good archers like Nebun (of the top of my head, he and another good archer actually did impact the game noticeably today) probably hits 2,5 or so, for a good archer that shouldnt be strange or nerf worthy.