Logically, Hans should at least be happy that a center for disabled people was attacked and not something else. These people cost a lot of money.
The disabled people that benefit from that center don't arm themselves with automatic weapons and go on shooting sprees killing a large number of people and then place explosives around a complex to try to further harm anyone unlucky enough to set the explosives off. Just a little bit different. I can see how you would get confused about that though.
Not wanting hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on two mass murderers is pretty much the same as being against any/all social services and wishing death upon anyone who would benefit on social services... Right?
Also quite hilarious that your alarms go off because there is some Islamic connection/background (to what extend is to be seen) but you still are persuaded that there is no problem with a whole population being armed and having easy access to firearms. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/24/9183525/gun-violence-statistics
That comment was made well before the names (or ethnicity) of these suspects was released. My opinion goes for everyone who picks up a gun and goes on a killing spree regardless of beliefs or skin color... But also quite hilarious that your alarms go off and you would assume I'm a racist because of my alternative opinions on justice.
As for gun control: If we are going to take away firearms from everyone in the country because 0.01% of gun owners go out and kill someone with their gun... Then we should also take cars away from everyone because a small fraction of drivers drive recklessly and end up killing people on the road with their vehicle due to their reckless driving.
Also I think gun ownership should be a right that is protected, but I don't think it should be a free for all where anyone can buy a gun with no background checks... Background checks should be a requirement on all firearm sales and responsibly storing a firearm should also be a requirement. The people who left their loaded firearm under a couch cushion only to have a 6 year old pick it up and shoot herself dead recently should most definitely be charged with a crime, get prison time and lose their rights to own firearms. Gun control isn't really a simple yes/no solution.
Let's not pretend that these murderers would have not been able to kill people if we had gun laws like Mexico. They had explosives as well.
Who decides that a case is a "case like this"? Everyone deserves a fair trial. That is one pillar of the modern western society - at least in theory. Giving this up brings us one step closer to the Chinese, Russians, Turks and all those Near East muppets.
Obviously the person who decides it is the law enforcement officers in the shootout with these murderers.
I'm pretty sure they have courts of law in China and Russia etc... Are you assuming our courts are perfect examples of justice and their courts are invalid?
Sure everyone deserves a fair trial, I can agree to that. But only on the condition that the punishment for those found guilty is fair to the victims and the families of the victims.
I don't think having a criminal who's killed 10+ people sit around in prison w/ better living conditions than your average citizen of a 3rd world country who's never killed someone in their life is anything close to justice.
U.S. Court system is flawed and doesn't know how to dole out punishment appropriate for crimes of this magnitude. I would always prefer to see a mass murderer killed whether by their own hands or another's than to see them go through the court system only to be able to give their cause a voice and spread their philosophy and then end up with shelter, clothes, bed, health care, and 3 meals a day provided by taxpayers.
