Why is it us that did it? Ffs, if half the awake community hadn't gone on an anti-Acre crusade (lol) before the battle no one would have signed for Archiboit. Well, not the 20 that did. Couldn't it have been someone else? I really don't get this. It seems kind of comical honestly. Everyone accusing us of cheating and we're all baffled. Guess you can't ungearbug yourself and attack. I guess the community reaction to my raiding something is part of it, but they don't have to take it out on the entire faction. Of course they would though. Furthermore, I didn't put any trade goods into largos' fief. I got rid of some shit armour. As for froi, louie and the others, I don't know what they did. There really wasn't much planning and we don't use this as some kind of tactic. It's very disturbing that people have so little trust in other people.
MY FIRST QUESTION IS: IS it just trade goods that bug it or does armour do it?
MY SECOND QUESTION IS: How does selling trade goods to a fief put them into the defender's inventory?
MY THIRD QUESTION IS: Couldn't someone else have recently trade those goods to the fief?
MY FOURTH QUESTION IS: Why do people twist the facts and cloud the truth with such assertions that they would have won the battle if they had peasant gear? If there wasn't a "crusade" against us because of what happened, we wouldn't have been ninja rostered like that.
My FIFTH QUESTION IS: Why poll ban me when I didn't have anything to do with the damned situation as far as I know? I haven't gearbugged anything, and if I gearbugged Largos' fief it doesn't even matter. This is all just because I raided the fief. Take it out by swarming MY army whenever you see it. Don't take it out on my entire faction by cheating in battles and refusing to sign for any of us.
MY SIXTH QUESTION IS: Is there anyone reasonable in this community?
I'll answer my sixth question myself: no, apparently not.