National news have reported many, many times on the drowning kid, which was admiteddly an emotionally charged image, but I've actually heard more ranting about the hungarian reporter tripping that guy than about the kid. To hear and see news about the "refugees" raping, assaulting, attacking, killing, robbing other "refugees" if they happen to be a different ethnicity/religion or unprotected women, not to mention the european natives who actually live in/near the areas receiving the "refugees", in fact about any sort of negative perception of this mass migration, the internet is the only place for sources, often on extremely racist extremist far right websites or websites populated by them at least. I wish I could ignore everything from such sources just because the messengers are incredibly biased, but I would have to extend the same courtesy to practically any news sources in that case. Liveleak is a den of neo-reactionary racist "red pillers", as they call themselves, but it doesn't mean videos posted there are fucking computed generated hoaxes or should just be ignored because they don't concur with the narrative. It's not about the messenger, it's about the message, and I can't be enough of a blind idiot to dismiss the evidence of my own eyes as nothing more than the fears of irrational racists. It'd be so easy, to be such a deluded, ideologically driven idiot. It would require sooo little thought, introspection and most importantly research.
This is mostly my impression of french national news on television, I'm sure the reporting varies from country to country, and probably local news have more nuanced perceptions, but you'd have to be a blind idiots (i.e Leshma) to think there isn't a deliberate positive slant to the refugees in mainstream media.
Poll