I have great tryhard solution, make EU2/NA2 influence your K/D also. And then, unless your K/D is at least 10/1 you are not good enough to be allowed in Eu1/NA1 because you are deemed to be merely 'average' or worse... 'below average' and not fit to compete in battle where only the most COMMITTED players are welcome. Also you are not allowed to view, post, or contribute to polls on the game balance discussion board unless your K/D is 20/1 minimum because everyone knows only players who have a SWEET K/D on a single class are truly qualified to decide cRPG balance and policy.
I dont see how thats a tryhard solution, you cant minmax tryhard without peasants and scrubs to hunt. You still have a lot to learn. And anyways, commitment=/=contribution. It never was about people playing poorly, but about how people dont play at all.
If you are bad at the game it will feel unfair, and so you will have a completely different look on it compared to someone who is experienced with it. That doesnt mean their opinion is unwanted, but it generally has no real base, since the problem is with the players skill. Some try to get better, some try to get the game to adapt to their current skill.
(no heskey it is cos you are bad player and are just relieved they aren't trying to kill you, git good nab you secretly want to tryhard too).
I came.
