The Hamas position on the two-state solution does not seem that clear-cut to me. I have read about denials of previous acceptations and about refusals to end the violence even if a two-state solution is reached. Their rhetoric has been ambigious and their desire for violence towards Israel seems to trump their desire for a solution at many a time. Just saying that it doesn't seem that clear to me that the two-state solution is held back only because of Israel.
Yes, the rhetoric is ambiguous (a good example
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jun/22/israel) and is for the sake of internal politics similar to much of Israel's most crazy and bloodthirsty rhetoric (see also through which media the opposing stances are communicated, western press are fed reconciliation while radical forces at home are fed defiance). But the diplomatic message is clear and otherwise a realpolitik imperative for an ant against an elephant. The Hamas leadership is not stupid nor suicidal, they recognize their situation.
There's a lot to consider for either nation to accept a two-state solution, so for Hamas to even insinuate it is a first step towards peace that Israel should try to emulate. Particularly when seen in the light that Palestine, when accepting Israel as a 'Jewish state' (as it is phrased in Israel's Basic Law), at the same time gives up on the 'right to return', and legitimizes Israel's 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and past and current aggression against the Palestinian people. Similarly, Israel would have to accept the 'right to return' of the Palestinians (which has never even been a topic for the Israeli government because it would confer democratic power to the arab minority), and also accept that Palestine, when accepted into the international community would be able to hold Israel accountable for its war crimes and 'crimes against humanity' under international law (even genocide according to the KLWCT).
A pretty good analysis:
http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=296
" The land of Palestine is an islamic land". And they're in favor of the destruction of Israel, and that's why they don't want to recognize Israel as a country, and that's why Israel can't negociate any "2 official countries" there.
Please read above and please remember Israel has never acknowledged a Palestinian state in any way (in opposition to most of the international community), and also claims Israel is a 'Jewish state'. Closest was the Oslo Accords but the chief Israeli diplomat was murdered by Zionist terrorists before anything good came out of it. If Israel would agree to the terms from Oslo there would be a two-state solution, in agreement with the rest of the world. But Israeli leaders continue to refuse it.
Just looking at a map demonstrates to Palestinians and everyone else that Israel is not interested in a viable Palestinian state, the illegal settlements and land grabbing is legally an act of war in itself, and with the current development soon there will be nothing left to build a state on.
truce
armies
There was no truce as Israel has consistently been breaking it, by occupying the land against international law, daily breaches of the Geneve accord in the occupied territories and constantly expanding its illegal settlements on Palestinian land, forcibly expelling the inhabitants and taking the best land while dividing Palestine into completely seperated bantustans, surrounded by fortified Israeli settlements and military checkpoints and walls, leaving no hope for a contiguous Palestinian state.
Also, Palestine has no standing army, some factions have smaller militias and there's no central government or army command.
Only problem is that there never was a country called Palestine. When Israel declared a state in 1948 and was attacked by 5 Arab armies, the Muslim religious leaders urged the Palestinians that were living in the area of the Jewish state to leave so that it would be easier to crush the new country.
Why haven't the Arabs and the Palestinians agreed to a two country solution for the last 64 years? It's because they wish to see Israel destroyed and all the Jews along with it.
But was there a state called Israel before that, either? Also, as you comment it is sometimes claimed in Israeli propaganda that the Palestinians fled themselves and were not to terrorized to do so, but even Israeli academia do not try to deny that the Israelis ethnically cleansed the region and the evidence is simply overwhelming (even from the mouths of contemporary Israeli policy makers). There's plenty of Israeli massacres against Palestinians on record (also in Israeli archives) in 1948 (and since), I suggest you look them up. Most Palestinians were simply expelled but the massacres helped convince most who could to flee to seek safety for their families in neighbouring countries (who in general were not very welcoming). Those few that have stayed are mostly those with little ressources.
And to the last part yes, as I've written above, the argument that Palestine is blocking the two-state solution when Israel has exclaimed time and again there will be no Palestinian state, and that Israel will be a Jewish state, and has continuously blocked the two-state solution in the UN and elsewhere, is too flawed to reiterate. Take a look at the unequivocal diplomatic record, please.