Author Topic: 0.3.3.7  (Read 58472 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stickher

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 88
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: _____
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #150 on: May 28, 2014, 10:15:48 pm »
+3
I agree brother, Tydeus please leave our mod alone. Please?

you could do only one good thing bring old crpg back

exp BARN!

Offline mrrdhardy

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 183
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Packer_The_Sloth
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Sloths
  • Game nicks: Packer_The_Sloth Brotherman_Bill Bo_Bo_The_Sloth_Templar_Hobo
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #151 on: May 28, 2014, 10:25:48 pm »
+1
you could do only one good thing bring old crpg back

exp BARN!
yes bring back old patch and xp barn!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #152 on: May 28, 2014, 10:27:34 pm »
+2
wtf devs!!!! WOOF WOOF

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
                           visitors can't see pics , please register or login
« Last Edit: May 28, 2014, 10:33:27 pm by jtobiasm »

Offline Corsair831

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1168
  • Infamy: 616
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #153 on: May 28, 2014, 10:29:18 pm »
+2
If anyone messes up send me a PM with the char name and i'll revert.

you're such a nice guy

i mean my build's not affected in the slightest by this patch, but i'd just like to point out, that you're such a nice guy

:)
I 10/10'd cRPG on moddb.com!

Do your bit for our community and write a 10/10 review for cRPG on http://www.moddb.com/mods/crpg !

Offline xxkaliboyx

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 318
  • Infamy: 104
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deserter_Merrrrrica
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #154 on: May 28, 2014, 10:41:08 pm »
0
Can we look at the Desert Horse and the Arabian Horse?  What is the incentive to go up to 7 Riding if the Desert Horse is just as good with 2 less in riding with minus 1200 upkeep? Besides that, Heavy Cav was due a nerf, but what about the Heavy Cav characters? What are they going to do with their loomed heavy horses?

PS: Throwers are everywhere and seem a little OP at the moment.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2014, 10:45:23 pm by xxkaliboyx »
Deserter_Merrrrrica

Offline mrrdhardy

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 183
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Packer_The_Sloth
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Sloths
  • Game nicks: Packer_The_Sloth Brotherman_Bill Bo_Bo_The_Sloth_Templar_Hobo
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #155 on: May 28, 2014, 10:43:37 pm »
0
Can we look at the Desert Horse and the Arabian Horse?  What is the incentive to go up to 7 Riding if the Desert Horse is just as good with 2 less in riding with minus 1200 upkeep? Besides that, Heavy Cav was due a nerf, but what about the Heavy Cav characters? What are they going to do with their loomed heavy horses?
your right Heavy cav was due a nerf but not this way, make it 7 to 8 riding is stupid its not a nerf its called making it unplayable
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline NJ_Legion_Icedtea

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 259
  • Infamy: 35
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Norsemen
  • Game nicks: Norse_Icedtea
  • IRC nick: Icedtea
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #156 on: May 28, 2014, 10:53:20 pm »
0
Eh now i don't have to ride cav anymore that is what the partial respec lets u do right (go inf instead of cav)?

exactly what I did, with 5 riding you really don't have much horse choice anymore

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #157 on: May 28, 2014, 10:56:41 pm »
+3
your right Heavy cav was due a nerf but not this way, make it 7 to 8 riding is stupid its not a nerf its called making it unplayable

6-8, is that really unplayable? :rolleyes:

If you used strength builds with 5 riding you can reach Padded Warhorse, Courser, the Barded horses and the Destrier with the free respec, not bad I'd say. The original suggestion was much harsher, it was tweaked later on.

(click to show/hide)
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #158 on: May 28, 2014, 11:02:14 pm »
0
6-8, is that really unplayable? :rolleyes:

If you used strength builds with 5 riding you can reach Padded Warhorse, Courser, the Barded horses and the Destrier with the free respec, not bad I'd say. The original suggestion was much harsher, it was tweaked later on.

(click to show/hide)


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline mrrdhardy

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 183
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Packer_The_Sloth
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Sloths
  • Game nicks: Packer_The_Sloth Brotherman_Bill Bo_Bo_The_Sloth_Templar_Hobo
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #159 on: May 28, 2014, 11:03:37 pm »
-3
6-8, is that really unplayable? :rolleyes:

If you used strength builds with 5 riding you can reach Padded Warhorse, Courser, the Barded horses and the Destrier with the free respec, not bad I'd say. The original suggestion was much harsher, it was tweaked later on.

(click to show/hide)
all I can say is role on banner lords so you guys lose all your powers  :lol:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Waylit

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 46
  • Infamy: 29
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: chinaserf1
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #160 on: May 28, 2014, 11:09:07 pm »
+2
Nice to wake up to a patch I mostly like.

My one concern is that 8 Diff for the heaviest horses seems a bit much.  Note, I do not play that class.  But when being a plated horse knight means going 16-18/24 now...and you have to soak 8 skill points into riding... It weights this game even further towards 31+ levels.

And that sucks for new players, especially new players who like to have alts and play different classes.  Every game change that gives  31+ levels (Ultra Levels) more advantages/incentives/impossible classes shafts the newbie, who is left with the choice of spending their play time getting Masterworks, or avoiding those and going straight to Ultra Level so they can compete skills wise (or at least run away from 15/30s) with the Old Guard (who are covered in multi-alt masterwork sets and are working on lvl 35 at the moment). 

Barely affects me, but I have one very good friend of mine who refuses to play this game because why should a free mod have a class progression model that gives heavy rewards to those who have played the game a long time?  It's not like y'all profit off playtime like MMORPGs or anything. 

I personally wouldn't mind a new player skipping the fun, leeching for some cash, and then getting to play the Plated Knight of Their Dreams.  They still won't have the Str or AGI of the 34s. 

Offline BlindGuy

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 583
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • De oppresso liber et plus ultra.
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #161 on: May 28, 2014, 11:12:32 pm »
0
BlindGuy, the way you express your sentiments, calls for your opinion to be ignored, whether valid or not.
Less general personal attacks, more constructive argumentation!

I could baste my opinions in butter and serve with a sprig of parsley and they would carry the same weight Butan :D

I wrote another rage post about the way balance is, but then deleted it, just to write this:

Non of the recent changes (Or any tbh) have greatly inconvenienced me, my "main" (I dont really have this), or my fav weapons or playstyle. I love all the classes, except horse ranged, have many gens of many things, have ecclectic and silly looms, I love it all. Light spiked club to long maul, dagger to long bow, I love them all, but each patch I watch more things "fixed" by breaking them. So, from me, to balance team:

Please stop. Please.
I don't know enough

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline phnxhdsn

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 355
  • Infamy: 29
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium / Vanguard / DMG
  • Game nicks: Phoenix, Mangudai
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #162 on: May 28, 2014, 11:12:57 pm »
+1
Cicero gun be mad, lel

Finally a buff for eastern horse!! and they actually put in 2 slot but 3 ammo lances which i suggested like a year ago :D
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Grumpy_Nic

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1023
  • Infamy: 306
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Hermann_von_Krems
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #163 on: May 28, 2014, 11:27:17 pm »
-3
6-8, is that really unplayable? :rolleyes:

If you used strength builds with 5 riding you can reach Padded Warhorse, Courser, the Barded horses and the Destrier with the free respec, not bad I'd say. The original suggestion was much harsher, it was tweaked later on.

(click to show/hide)

Now that shows that whoever made this is... special. Do you just want to reduce cav or what was actually the thought behind it? I'd like to be able to follow your point of view on balancing/changing.

Offline Friedturtle

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 224
  • Infamy: 10
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.7
« Reply #164 on: May 28, 2014, 11:37:15 pm »
+7
Love the patch so far :)

But whats up with this?  :lol:

__________________________________________________________________________
|
  • Donkey                                         | old                             | new                           |

|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| gold                                                   | 4467                          | 4471                          |