Author Topic: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive  (Read 64869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #495 on: June 15, 2015, 12:33:33 pm »
0
Hmm didn't expect that, cool
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mr_Oujamaflip

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 322
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
    • Ouj Reviews!
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #496 on: June 15, 2015, 01:09:27 pm »
0
I think it's a misconception, it's not the suppressor that does it but there are subsonic rounds used alongside them for a lot of weapons which are slower.

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #497 on: June 15, 2015, 01:36:02 pm »
0
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/05/foghorn/ask-foghorn-does-a-silencer-effect-the-velocity-of-the-bullet/

I didn't know they managed to solve the problem with the old silencers that were reducing the muzzle flash, thanks for the heads up.

Offline Radament

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • ☑Yes ☒No
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction
  • Game nicks: «Radament» «Miasma»
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #498 on: June 15, 2015, 01:39:16 pm »
+2
next patch

(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)


anyway , yes , it seems m4a1-s does more dmg in the long range (like 3-4 hp).
the only con seems to be less bullets , price and longer weapon model.
here's a spreasheet for anyone interested in the weapon's differences in damage , armor pen etc..https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuOy-5I1VcBMdGZmYndxUjctc1VNUDZHTXJFUE9Dbmc#gid=0
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 01:52:08 pm by Radament »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Radament

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • ☑Yes ☒No
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction
  • Game nicks: «Radament» «Miasma»
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #499 on: June 15, 2015, 05:16:01 pm »
0
ok i just tried ingame with the practice cfg and m4a4/m4a1-s spreadsheet valors are wrong.

you can see here that basic damage vs armored is 33 for both ---> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuOy-5I1VcBMdGZmYndxUjctc1VNUDZHTXJFUE9Dbmc#gid=6

now look at the range growing values (for ex. 100Units is 22,96/23,05) and so on ....well , after testing range modifiers on dust 2 on equal distances , they do the same damage at body at short/medium distances (like 27-28).


*edit even at long ranges m4a4 lose only 1hp dmg

long range dmg (stomach):

m4a4 - 26

m4a1-s - 27

maybe try yourself and if you find something wrong with the dmg , tell me , i may have done something wrong.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 05:41:11 pm by Radament »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tibe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1335
  • Infamy: 287
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #500 on: June 15, 2015, 10:04:06 pm »
+1
Honestly I never even noticed that there was a difference. I just figured the silencer was cosmetic and nothing else.

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #501 on: June 15, 2015, 11:32:00 pm »
0
*edit even at long ranges m4a4 lose only 1hp dmg
That's per bullet, how many times have you sprayed someone and got 96~ in 4?

Anyway the guns are personal preference pick one to suit your playstyle.

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #502 on: June 15, 2015, 11:34:05 pm »
0
and again until at least 12 am my ping is shit (over 120) fuck it
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Radament

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • ☑Yes ☒No
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction
  • Game nicks: «Radament» «Miasma»
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #503 on: June 16, 2015, 03:24:53 am »
0
Anyway the guns are personal preference pick one to suit your playstyle.

here's my playstyle , what should i pick?  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #504 on: June 16, 2015, 11:04:48 am »
+3
here's my playstyle , what should i pick?  :mrgreen:
aimware.net

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #505 on: June 16, 2015, 08:58:13 pm »
0
Could you suggest me a good and cheap vpn (with servers in netherland/german or france)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #506 on: June 16, 2015, 09:20:41 pm »
+1
Could you suggest me a good and cheap vpn (with servers in netherland/german or france)
https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #507 on: June 17, 2015, 02:57:11 am »
0
Yes, tried the proxy and ping goes down by 60-80 (still around 85 on the net graph but playable at least); unsure if I should go woth wtfast or a proxy tho
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #508 on: June 17, 2015, 01:18:35 pm »
+2
If your internet is fucked, as in your connection to your ISP (and perhaps even further), connecting to VPN/proxy won't help (it all depends on the route). Sure, ping might show lower, but that's because the ping is measured from game server to your proxy server, and not to your line/pc directly. VPN works if VPN route bypasses the point on the path of the packet which is congesting shit. Check with tracert (to game server) to see where shit gets rough.

PS: most public VPNs are HORRIBLE.

Offline Radament

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • ☑Yes ☒No
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction
  • Game nicks: «Radament» «Miasma»
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #509 on: June 17, 2015, 01:49:55 pm »
+1
i always used nvpn , it's probably the best of paid vpns imho.
it has shared and dedicated IP (you can share the ip with other 6-8 people risking ip ban or  pay more and have your private ip) , it has no logging at all , easy to use and quite affordable price.

other paid very good ones are :

-https://143vpn.com/
-https://ra4wvpn.com/


for free....i really don't know , i tried a lot , and when i mean a lot they are a lot and all were shit.
someone say cyberghost is good....maybe give it a try , for me it's shit specially for playing cs.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2015, 02:05:05 pm by Radament »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login