Author Topic: next strategus round?  (Read 5828 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #30 on: April 18, 2014, 04:03:24 pm »
-2
UIF is the reason itself of the lack of fun in strat. Don't even try to say no, you are trying to force people to be nerds and to start unite every european faction to make a fucking block that no one wants. I don't care for my part, reached the level 35 yesterday, just want to say you are just disgusting because you simply want to get all the map for your e-peen, without giving fucks about fairness of fights, XP and fun you can get from it.

Plus you said once that you want a challenge, what the fuck bro ? You come with thoussands of troops almost shinny equipped to rape peasants and you say you want challenge ? Stop assuming we are idiots, since at the end, we see perfectly what kind of players you are in reality : lamers.

omg.
Man, you obviously suck at psychology much more then I suck at english language. Or may be you are too young.

One of the most obvious charachteristics of immaturity is "buck passing". Finding reasons and exuses in "outer world" not in yourself.
You say - "UIF is the reason itself of the lack of fun in strat". so UIF is responsible for your funless Strat. That's what I'm saying.
It's like: "I can't earn 15000$ per month, cause my director doesn't pay me that sum". Not because I am too stupid and lazy, but because someone is not doing what I think he should do for me.
So, once again, grow older and stop blaming anyone. Noone needs to or should be exactly like you want him to be. It's only YOU who is responsible for YOUR fun in Strat, your family, your life, vacations, studies etc. Only you.

Next thing you miss completely is that there are always SEVERAL (at least two) points of view. And it depends ONLY on person.
You say "UIF is the reason itself of the lack of fun in strat." You are right from YOUR point of view.
I say "Tearfull nubs like pinguin are the reason of the lack of fun in strat." I am right from MY point of view.
Who is right? Noone and both at the same time. who said that your point of view is THE ONLIEST GOSPEL-TRUTH? Fips and pinguin? GM? Well, be happy to share your common point of view with them. But, sorry, it's only your point of view.
Welcome to yin yang.

Let's go further
"you are just disgusting because you simply want to get all the map for your e-peen, without giving fucks about fairness of fights, XP and fun you can get from it."
That is what you think. Well done, and may be it seem to be true from you point of view.
Who said it? Nebun? Archer KMC? I don't remember them saying something like this, really.
I talked to them at the beginning of round, you may be surprised, but they said they are going to have fun this strat. Did they have it? guess they did. As well as dozens of UIF teammates.

Next.
You talk about "fairness of fights".
Our enemies keep failing with organisation of fights since 1st strat. They always have less equip then tickets, they never have balanced equip for all classes, etc. Also, they fail to start an attack in the right time. So what do you want UIF to do? To spawn naked and go fist fights, when someone failed to have more then 500 armours for his 2,5k army?
Can you understand it? you are trying to blame UIF for having unfair fights. You are blaming UIF again. Why the hell should they care about fairness? But yes, they are responsible, sure. They are bad because they don't make it fun for you.

To conclude with
"we see perfectly what kind of players you are in reality : lamers."
I don't know who give you the right to speak for others, or what group of "WE" do you represent, but
"in reality" UIF is the bestest ever Strategus coalition (not the biggest one, not the first, not the last, but the best). I know it's lame, cause it's no fun for you.


Keshian, peace bro.
Deal with it and suck please deeper.
Thanks.
Igni et ferro

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #31 on: April 18, 2014, 04:06:27 pm »
+1
UIF is the reason itself of the lack of fun in strat. Don't even try to say no, you are trying to force people to be nerds and to start unite every european faction to make a fucking block that no one wants. I don't care for my part, reached the level 35 yesterday, just want to say you are just disgusting because you simply want to get all the map for your e-peen, without giving fucks about fairness of fights, XP and fun you can get from it.

Plus you said once that you want a challenge, what the fuck bro ? You come with thoussands of troops almost shinny equipped to rape peasants and you say you want challenge ? Stop assuming we are idiots, since at the end, we see perfectly what kind of players you are in reality : lamers Eastern Europeans/Russians.

FTFY...it's a mentality. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #32 on: April 18, 2014, 04:08:07 pm »
-2
FTFY...it's a mentality. 

How do you know that much about eastern europe mentality?
Igni et ferro

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #33 on: April 18, 2014, 04:11:07 pm »
-2
What I am trying to say is

PLEASE

BLAME UIF

BLAME UIF AS HARD AS YOU CAN


In that case you are not responsible for anything.


But don't excpet any Strategus changes. The more you blame others, the less chances for you to have fun playing Strat.
If you can't understand it, then

join Keshian please
form a circle
I'm gonna
cum
soon
Igni et ferro

Offline ARN_

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 605
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmar Union
  • Game nicks: Kalmarunionen_Arn
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #34 on: April 18, 2014, 04:22:44 pm »
+2
So what you are saying is that if you and 10 guys are beating up someone half your size it's his fault he can't defend himself and he got no rights to blame you for being 10 vs 1?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
'You think you tell us what we do?'
'We not here for you entertainment'.
Eastern European sportsmanship 2014

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #35 on: April 18, 2014, 04:23:28 pm »
+1
Do you think people will play strat with players like you in front of them ? I'm tired to go on the same roster, tired to shoot the same guys and being killed by the same guys, do you think it 's up to all the clans except yours to change it ? It got tried to stop DRZ, but how it got tried ? With peasant gear, blame our lack of organization : we don't have 25+ fiefs where we can buy heavy armors with 50%+ discount. Because we are inactive, yeah, of course, we got for most of clans a maximum of 30 players in a strat faction, and most of them got pissed of, or just don't care since they got a life and aren't refreshing strat page every 5 mins. Although I disagree with Keshian's point about cheating, you clearly play lamely, and it's not only MY point of view as a merc, but as a player X or Y. Attacking people with huge ammount of tickets and armors with complete roster against peasants doesn't make you the best faction, just makes you look like opportunists, that are wiped when opponents got the same kind of equipment in the same quantity, and a decent roster. And you will probably say, "yeah, and ? It's all your fault, just unite and kill us if you are better". And I just answer it's too late, we aren't playing on the same ground, because you think there must be a block to fight you, then you fail to understand it, and therefore ruin strat. It's logical.

(Plus the fact I'm young doesn't affect my comprehension of things, you can call me biased, but I'm trying to stay neutral as possible).

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #36 on: April 18, 2014, 04:30:40 pm »
+1
UIF wasn't first or second large alliance? my memory may be fading but pretty sure it was. Templars was huge yes but it wasn't a large alliance we just took in anyone who applied. UIF is the first actual alliance that i can recall "just forming to stop templar bloc crushing small 22nd"
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #37 on: April 18, 2014, 04:48:00 pm »
-1
So what you are saying is that if you and 10 guys are beating up someone half your size it's his fault he can't defend himself and he got no rights to blame you for being 10 vs 1?

You almost got it.
almost
He CAN blame them and call them pussies for attacking him 10 on 1. In this case he is a victim, he was attacked by superforce and it's ok that he was beaten, he was alone against 10 of them twice of his size.
He can blame them day after day. He is right - he is twice smaller, he was alone, they are bad people.
And nothing will change.

He can blame himself for not being able to run away, or beat all of them.
In this case he is responsible for being beaten.

When someone recognizes his defeat, he makes first step to avoid such defeat in the future.
Igni et ferro

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #38 on: April 18, 2014, 04:55:18 pm »
+1
How do you know that much about eastern europe mentality?

I'm glad you asked, I'm kind of an expert.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
[/spoiler]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 05:58:38 pm by CrazyCracka420 »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #39 on: April 18, 2014, 05:13:20 pm »
0
Lol
I thought communist were idiots, seems like they were a bit less idiots
Igni et ferro

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #40 on: April 18, 2014, 05:21:45 pm »
+2
Zaharist you are beating a dead horse :P anti UIF has tried big bloc its tried defend the castles its tried pretty much everything and nothing worked. Now when anti UIF has far fewer active players they are trying the meh lets not even bother tactic. You cant expect your enemies to just build up then get stomped each strat and think its fun
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Switchtense

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1137
  • Infamy: 137
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • poking you where the sun dont shine!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns, BIRD CLAN BEST CLAN!
  • Game nicks: All sorts of Switch's
  • IRC nick: Switchtense
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #41 on: April 18, 2014, 05:48:21 pm »
+3
you cannot blame UIF for playing strat their way - neither can you blame the rest for not "uniting under one banner" and winning

yes, UIF could split up, but why would they? because anti-uif doesnt like their way of playing strat? grow up, life isnt all pie and candy, if you expect them to say "ohh, you dont like us being allied? we are sorry, we will split up and have a huge war with each other right away" then you should get out more and see what life is like

For all the non-believers, look no further than this thread for proof that while strat battles are won/lost in NA3/EU3, strat wars are won and lost on the forums.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline GRANDMOM

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 920
  • Infamy: 140
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GRANDMOM
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #42 on: April 18, 2014, 05:59:10 pm »
+3
(click to show/hide)

Zaharist, with all the respect I can muster, because I do respect you - all the argumentation about who to blame is useless, wont go nowhere wont solve anything. I am not blaming you for the situation at hand, nor the DRZ or the UIF - I say you have the key to solve this, nothing more nothing less.


UIF solution:
*** "Unite all clans outside the UIF, get organised, get better, get active"
*** Chance of success: 1%
*** Result: none
*** Game: dead since no solution can be reached
*** Difficulty: Impossible
*** Problems: WE CANT

Our solution:
*** Break up the strongest alliance on the map
*** Chance of success: 100%
*** Result: two large factions fighting, backed up by several small factions that would join in the war on each side
*** Game: Resurrected for this round - perhaps for next aswell
*** Difficulty: easy
*** Problems: UIF DOESNT WANT TO

I know you view this the same way, everyone that knows diddely squat about strategus knows this - this far we can all agree
So, I wont say its your fault that you wont go for the solution that would solve the situation, you have your reasons for it Im sure, I dont think they are logical from my point of view but I respect them.. You cant really blame us for not being able to solve it either - cause in our defence - we at least did try to solve it while you havent.

And here we stand, still the same problem and no solution in sight. You hold the key, we dont - and if you dont use it there will be no good round of strategus.





visitors can't see pics , please register or login


We're working on something cooler than a blog.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #43 on: April 18, 2014, 05:59:58 pm »
+4
Dat whole Eastern European mentality.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Switchtense

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1137
  • Infamy: 137
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • poking you where the sun dont shine!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns, BIRD CLAN BEST CLAN!
  • Game nicks: All sorts of Switch's
  • IRC nick: Switchtense
Re: next strategus round?
« Reply #44 on: April 18, 2014, 06:04:32 pm »
+2
Because i assume they play strat to get battles. Well they wont get any if they dont. It's their problem now. No coincidence that it's now UIF crying all over forums about how we're playing wrong lol.

Anyway, as i said, we're done telling them how to play, they can do what they want, just not complain when they face empty rosters every time.

i am just assuming they dont give a shit about battles - all they want is an enemy they can stomp
then wait for another enemy to stomp, or if no other enemy arises they tell the already stomped one "come on, get up even though we beat you close to death"

no one is to blame for this situation, as grandmom said
then again, its only the UIF who can change the situation, if they dont want to - fair enough

thats why ill go to NA :D
For all the non-believers, look no further than this thread for proof that while strat battles are won/lost in NA3/EU3, strat wars are won and lost on the forums.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login