Poll

Which one do you want to play ?

Old cRPG
85 (62%)
New cRPG
52 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 137

Author Topic: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !  (Read 2495 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 965
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« on: April 02, 2014, 02:40:49 pm »
+10
Old cRPG:
-Every class had it's role in battlefield . (Just like in real medieval battlefields.)
-New player friendly. Even if you fail to play the game you could contribute by being part of the formation. (Just like real medieval battlefields.)
-It was unbalanced,realistic and fun. (Just like real medieval battlefields.)
-Usage of terrain and formation was the main point. (Just like real medieval battlefields.)
-Tactical game.
-Even if your team has lesser skilled fighters,you could win by using right tactics as a team. (Just like real medieval battlefields. P.S: Agincourt)
-Multipliars had it's meaning,team with x5 could milk it by holding a defensive ground and forceing enemy team with x1 to initiate the battle
-Epic times where you hold a high ground with multi and taunt the enemy at chat,accusing them of cowardice
-Clans were effective because of their organized formations and inspiring others in the team to be a part of that formation
-Epic group charges that make you feel like you are actually there (Just like in medieval movies )
-Random and big open field maps where tacticians shine

New cRPG:
-Forcing people to have high KDR rather than anything else.
-New players treated like moving targets,totally useless and forcing them to quit playing or just leech.
-Still unbalanced just not realistic and fun anymore
-No time to use terrain or formations, rush to the flag and fight there
-Hack'n Slash based game no tactics or anything,go kill and profit.
-Rounds end too quickly no matter what you do.
-Clans are only good if they have good KDR.
-No organized group activity at all. Just some good individual duels to enjoy
-Close quarters CoD inspired maps with secret passages and shit



Summary: You removed realism and turned this game into Call of Duty : Medieval Warfare. Let's see if the community is happy about it.

(click to show/hide)

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2014, 02:51:49 pm »
0
There's a reason (or reasons) why CRPG never tops over 100 players on servers (except for strat rarely) nowadays.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline jack786

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 194
  • Infamy: 62
  • cRPG Player
  • Field Commander
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Swadia
  • Game nicks: Nefcok
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2014, 02:55:14 pm »
+10
Good points, I agree. But why is there no give them run option in poll?
Signatures are displayed at the bottom of each post or personal message. BBCode and smileys may be used in your signature.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2014, 02:57:09 pm »
+13
Harunyahya's idea of fun is quite literally waiting.

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2014, 03:04:31 pm »
+7
I remember the old open field maps with 200 players on pecores server I think. Open field, people standing in formation, then shooting and stuff. Was epic. CRPG has never been that good since.

Also removal of swingable long voulge, over-restrictive slots, screw you balancing team :P
Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 965
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2014, 03:06:18 pm »
+2
Harunyahya's idea of fun is quite literally waiting.
Nope , i just think in order to have fun playing a medieval rpg game is actually playing in Medieval terms instead of fighting modern warfare with swords and bows.

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2014, 03:09:58 pm »
+20
People always tend to overestimate the past versions because they were "newer" players back then and therefore had more fun and enjoyment of the game.
However, if we try to look objectively at this matter, the new c-rpg is much, much better overall.

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 965
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2014, 03:13:07 pm »
+1
People always tend to overestimate the past versions because they were "newer" players back then and therefore had more fun and enjoyment of the game.
I agree to this.
However, if we try to look objectively at this matter, the new c-rpg is much, much better overall.
Please explain me why ?

Offline Falcom

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 169
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Falcom_von_Krems
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2014, 03:13:34 pm »
0
Useless stupid poll ever

Offline Tzar

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 564
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_TzarOfRushYa
  • IRC nick: TZAR
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2014, 03:22:16 pm »
+5
Ehhh.... ive just got sick of the game, played too much.

Doenst matter what class i respec into, i always get sick of the game after sometime :)

Old days where fun because 60% of the server sucked really bad, an you could mayhem huge crowds of people without getting killed.

People learned to block, an people now mostly play classes that they can farm kdr with, since multi is so fuckin stupid compared to the good old aoe xp/gold era.

I do agree on the map rotation, its plain an boring, and yes we have to many siege like maps on eu1
« Last Edit: April 02, 2014, 03:25:32 pm by Tzar »
I've never played a server where people split up as much or as often as on EU1.  No wonder range is having a field day.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2014, 03:28:12 pm »
+1
Nope , i just think in order to have fun playing a medieval rpg game is actually playing in Medieval terms instead of fighting modern warfare with swords and bows.

I prefer playing rather than trying to imagine I'm having fun when really I'm not.

Offline Moncho

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1127
  • Infamy: 221
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Moncho, Some_Random_STF, Some_Random_Troll
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2014, 03:29:40 pm »
+10
Old cRPG battle (what I remember):
A lot of the time mindless charges (just like today), where they get shot to pieces by much stronger ranged and extremely more OP cav than nowadays. (fun tiems!)
After a few rounds of this, sometimes someone would take charge and there will be some "tactics" (that is, stand close together in a shieldwall with spears and wait for the enemy to mindless charge)
Once in a blue moon both teams do "tactics", then it's a game of who gets tired of waiting first, standing in a shieldwall, the cav fighting each other, and ranged having a fun time.
Delaying by certain classes after the clash has happened and it's time to pick off the stragglers (we all know it, it has been discussed over 9000 times on this forum).

Just because you only remember those last ones which you apparently liked (I did not like to wait 4 minutes then be in a big formation, its like being dead for most of the round, yay fun) does not make it the norm. Nostalgia goggles are a bitch.

Nowadays it is imo better, flags are a big improvement, less open maps make cav slightly less broken, ranged is in a better place than it was, ...
Overall a better game, the shame is that people have played it far too much and get tired of it and leave, its after all an old mod for an obscure game

Offline //saxon

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 181
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • I'm just to dam goood 😎
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Saxon
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2014, 03:37:21 pm »
+3
so your saying

old cRPG was like an in depth "War" game (Battlefield 3)

and

New cRPG is just an arcade "War" game (Call of Duty)

all the facts are true that you stated here but i liked this one the best because of the good memories it brings to mind.
-Multipliars had it's meaning,team with x5 could milk it by holding a defensive ground and forceing enemy team with x1 to initiate the battle
Teamchat: "don't charge we have x5, they have x1, just stay here."
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2014, 03:39:04 pm »
+2


People learned to block,

Not really. They just slowed down the combat speed which makes it easier to block because everything is old people combat speed.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 965
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Old cRPG Battle vs New cRPG Battle Poll !
« Reply #14 on: April 02, 2014, 03:47:26 pm »
+1
don't charge we have x5, they have x1, just stay here."
EXP BARN !!!!11111