Author Topic: 0.3.3.5  (Read 30152 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2014, 02:15:20 pm »
+3
TL;DR chadz.

Offline Bronto

  • Head NA admin
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2014, 02:25:16 pm »
+4
|
  • Persian Battle Axe                             | old                            | new                           |

|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| gold                                               | 6132                           | 7172                          |
| speed rating                                       | 91                             | 92                            |
| swing damage                                       | 48 cut                         | 49 cut         


YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING! Already one shots everyone with more than 6 PS, let's give it more damage and speed and it can be used from horseback...

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
« Last Edit: April 02, 2014, 04:20:45 pm by Bronto »

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #32 on: April 02, 2014, 02:27:42 pm »
+4
(click to show/hide)


Thanks for pointing this out to me, I'll begin looming that beast.

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #33 on: April 02, 2014, 02:33:29 pm »
+2
Your days are counted  :mrgreen: 2H master race.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Still unbalanced and shit in duels though.

Offline Templar_Steevee

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 613
  • Infamy: 128
  • cRPG Player
  • Pew-pew for victory!!!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Steevee, Templar_catchArabbit, Gangtroll
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #34 on: April 02, 2014, 02:37:34 pm »
+1
like that loomed gear for archers is worth it :) decreasing a bit missile speed for nomad and tatar bow would be great anyway and still logic :)
Archer forever :D

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #35 on: April 02, 2014, 02:38:24 pm »
0
Muahahahah my red tassle spear is even faster now
It's not.  :wink:

Offline Tydeus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1422
  • Infamy: 351
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Item re-unbalance guy
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tydeus
  • IRC nick: Tydeus
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #36 on: April 02, 2014, 02:48:22 pm »
+1
It's not.  :wink:
Indeed, as Macropus has pointed out, make sure you're looking at the +3 version. We reworked when you gain what on looms, so that the first two loom levels are as good/better than the last.
chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #37 on: April 02, 2014, 02:53:59 pm »
+2
I like the crossbow str requirement change.
Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline Tovi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 387
  • Infamy: 251
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: OdE
  • Game nicks: KrisTovi
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #38 on: April 02, 2014, 02:59:12 pm »
+2
Knightly Kite Shield
weight: 3
body armor: 25
difficulty: 5
hit points: 219
speed rating: 100
shield height: 66
shield width: 46
4227g

Knightly Heater Shield
weight: 5
body armor: 35
difficulty: 4
hit points: 232
speed rating: 100
shield height: 55
shield width: 50
4328g

That was my number one shield, crap...


There is a problem with this shield. More difficulty but worst than K.Heater Shield...

Knightly Heater Shield
weight: 5
body armor: 35
difficulty: 4
hit points: 232
speed rating: 100
shield height: 55
shield width: 50


Knightly Kite Shield
weight: 3
body armor: 25
difficulty: 5
hit points: 219
speed rating: 100
shield height: 66
shield width: 46
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Ikarus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1470
  • Infamy: 121
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Your favourite Schnitzel
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Ikarooz, CrossBowbimbo
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #39 on: April 02, 2014, 03:01:48 pm »
+2
holy cow, 18 str for arbalest, whoa. Gotta see how this works out now...

If people still rant about xbow now, they´re retarted
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #40 on: April 02, 2014, 03:05:38 pm »
0

There is a problem with this shield. More difficulty but worst than K.Heater Shield...

Knightly Heater Shield
weight: 5
body armor: 35
difficulty: 4
hit points: 232
speed rating: 100
shield height: 55
shield width: 50


Knightly Kite Shield
weight: 3
body armor: 25
difficulty: 5
hit points: 219
speed rating: 100
shield height: 66
shield width: 46
Not exactly worse if you compare the weights. Seems like a fair tradeoff to me, also a really good option for non-1h shield wielder infantry.

Offline Grumbs

  • طالبان
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1170
  • Infamy: 617
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #41 on: April 02, 2014, 03:08:43 pm »
+2
holy cow, 18 str for arbalest, whoa. Gotta see how this works out now...

If people still rant about xbow now, they´re retarted

They still have no requirements. And no having an 18 str requirement for the highest damage one is nothing, an archer needs that for their top weapon and they have to sink 6 points into using it. Xbows don't need WPF as much as bows and are easier to snipe with
If you have ranged troubles use this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #42 on: April 02, 2014, 03:20:41 pm »
0
They still have no requirements. And no having an 18 str requirement for the highest damage one is nothing, an archer needs that for their top weapon and they have to sink 6 points into using it. Xbows don't need WPF as much as bows and are easier to snipe with

When you take into account you need WPF to reload fast enough to have the DPS of a simple short bow, you forget what you just said :D

I think like Ikarus that its fairly balanced, it has now a minimal str req (that is higher than the difficulty of wearing gothic plate... still nothing on increasing armor req?), best damage of the game, average/good accuracy without WPF, but very costy and slow to use.

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #43 on: April 02, 2014, 03:21:22 pm »
+1
Can someone clarify the change to lancing?
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Life

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 763
  • Infamy: 281
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mod is dead.
  • Game nicks: Assassin_Life, Efil, iK_Life
Re: 0.3.3.5
« Reply #44 on: April 02, 2014, 03:21:43 pm »
0
so can i haz respec too? ;/
Assassin Video
My custom crosshair
visitors can't see pics , please register or login