Author Topic: FCC #2?  (Read 6533 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LastKaze

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 126
  • Infamy: 38
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: LastKaze
  • IRC nick: LastKaze
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #60 on: March 24, 2014, 09:51:42 pm »
0
Let's be honest here, Strategus sucks.

#ModIsDead
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #61 on: March 25, 2014, 09:32:11 pm »
+6
GFORCE have had the most battles in NA so far, double that of others, we have used up the most troops attacking, we completely destroyed a faction that had more members than us in the first couple weeks of Strategus and we have had the vast majority of "Real Big Battles" so far.

I really don't care about people shittalking us for any other reason because hey thats funny and part of the game, but atleast be honest, we have so far contributed the most to actual battles out of any faction in NA, and I will attempt to keep doing that. The "merging" with Occitan is for my own personal sanity so I don't have to be around to do every single roster check and pester people to get mercs or do it myself, we pretty shamefully lost a 1200vs200 battle because I wasn't there to do the hiring until the last few minutes and no one else bothered to attempt to get people beforehand, but I don't want to have to schedule my time around Strategus battles. I really like everyone in LCO and we have pretty much the same views, so this is an obvious way for me to continue trying to provide fun battles for myself and my friends and not burn out on having to do everything like that myself or have it not be done.

I'm sorry I/we can't be as spergy as you about Strategus Kesh, truly.

Yes all those attacks on 100 man inactive player armies were great for the strat community, and fun fought battles indeed.   Whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.

Shitty peasant battles don't count.

And then I read this.. So you just nullified your own previous statement...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #62 on: March 26, 2014, 01:10:19 am »
-4
Yes all those attacks on 100 man inactive player armies were great for the strat community, and fun fought battles indeed.   Whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.

And then I read this.. So you just nullified your own previous statement...

Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Sandersson Jankins

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1450
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA Apologists
  • Game nicks: fnord
  • IRC nick: "There's always a bigger nerd"- Qui-Gong Jim, Star Trek IV: Electric Boogalo
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #63 on: March 26, 2014, 02:26:59 am »
+6
Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.

Not at all true, I suck at something and then talk shit frequently.

If you lose badly, you've got to have fun somehow. Talking shit is a great way to do that!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

the administrator of this forum is the Internet Keyboard man? Can only play "authority" in the virtual world?Can you tell me why?

Offline Aztek

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 282
  • Infamy: 62
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller Aztek
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #64 on: March 26, 2014, 02:36:09 am »
+2
Huseby, you generally have to do something better than someone else in order to talk shit about it.

You mean like pointing out a hypocritical statement and twisted tale of grand battles eliminating a faction that never really fought back?

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #65 on: March 26, 2014, 03:17:11 am »
-5
We still have the largest amount of large battles as well, so you're really just splitting hairs at this point to lessen the blow of being the first clan wiped this Strat.  We were in a war, and had to attack your traders.  It's not our fault your traders only had 100-200 troops and were unarmed.  If you see where the argument started, you can see you're just chasing your own tail here.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline HappyPhantom

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 440
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Pew pew, your face!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul, Always Take the Shot.
  • Game nicks: HappyPhantom, Marys of the Sea, Ancient of Mu Mu.
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #66 on: March 26, 2014, 03:23:56 am »
0
Isn't all you need to talk shit, a mouth (and/or fingers).
"Darklands" - The greatest game you never played: now on Steam http://store.steampowered.com/app/327930 | http://www.darklands.net/index.shtml
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Sandersson Jankins

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1450
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA Apologists
  • Game nicks: fnord
  • IRC nick: "There's always a bigger nerd"- Qui-Gong Jim, Star Trek IV: Electric Boogalo
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #67 on: March 26, 2014, 05:28:21 am »
+1
Isn't all you need to talk shit, a mouth (and/or fingers).

You could type shit if you were really desperate using only your nose, toes, or tongue.

But yeah, usually.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

the administrator of this forum is the Internet Keyboard man? Can only play "authority" in the virtual world?Can you tell me why?

Offline HarryCrumb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 339
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #68 on: March 26, 2014, 07:24:34 am »
+3
You could type shit if you were really desperate using only your nose, toes, or tongue.

But yeah, usually.

or an erect wiener. <==3

Offline xOps

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #69 on: March 26, 2014, 09:30:48 am »
+9
Dear Murder and imisshotmail,

I think you lost your ballz somewhere back there... cause you were acting like you were manly men, now you're moaning and groaning like mere boys...HE JUST AH BOI.  Now it's time for some quotes that you guys posted before when you were going all big dick.........

Murdertron: Gforce is a serious banner. Joe , soon yuo will kiss the ring s
Murdertron: You're tangoing with the wrong people here.  You don't know what you've got yourself in to.
Murdertron: Hospitallers, are you ready to kiss the rings?

imisshotmail: I don't know man, i'm having a lot of fun wrecking all the shit clans and players that I dislike so far. It's pretty funny actually, all those people seem to be the ones who aren't liking Strategus too? makes you think...
imisshotmail: Most people aren't Mafia material then...
imisshotmail: You complain when people aren't fighting, you complain when people are fighting, are you schizophrenic as well as autistic? It's not my problem Hospitaller are a shit clan who even with more players than GFORCE had considerably less gold to outfit their armies, they got owned deal with it.
imisshotmail: Hospitaller, Fallen and FCC? bring in HoC and Acre and we can have a BAD CLAN PARTY


AND MY VERY PERSONAL FAVORITE QUOTE GOES TO imisshotmail.......

imisshotmail: Please, more shit players and clans out yourself as liking Hospitaller so I can note it down. GFORCE will be purging the Strategus community of scrubs one clan at a time.



I was kind enough to leave all your guys' typos in...not that I'm judging on your grammar, because honestly I don't really give a sh...

So yeah, you talk the big game, until what--you realized you were dealing with real manly men on the opposing side? Calculated boyz...calculated. You guys handle yourselves like true 13YRO BOIS.


Cheers,

X


Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #70 on: March 26, 2014, 03:16:37 pm »
0
Com e at me. bro
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline KaMiKaZe_JoE

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 904
  • Infamy: 117
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Cavalieres
  • Game nicks: KaMiKaZe _______
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #71 on: March 26, 2014, 03:49:55 pm »
+7
Ur bad more like badforce. Joe said.

Ha now u can't warn me filthy mod scum it's RP, see, not spam.
"I don't think I'd want to meet anyone from cRPG. Sorry no offense lol" -TG

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #72 on: March 27, 2014, 02:02:48 am »
+1
We still have the largest amount of large battles as well, so you're really just splitting hairs at this point to lessen the blow of being the first clan wiped this Strat.  We were in a war, and had to attack your traders.  It's not our fault your traders only had 100-200 troops and were unarmed.  If you see where the argument started, you can see you're just chasing your own tail here.

Just want to make small correction - most of those battles were not traders but people you kicked out of fiefs after you took them.  Basically the most afk members of hospitallers with no strat ticks or gear.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #73 on: March 27, 2014, 02:38:41 am »
0
Just want to make small correction - most of those battles were not traders but people you kicked out of fiefs after you took them.  Basically the most afk members of hospitallers with no strat ticks or gear.

No, that's not true at all.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: FCC #2?
« Reply #74 on: March 27, 2014, 02:44:28 am »
+1
No, that's not true at all.

Lol, somebody's getting defensive.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo