The problem with you all is that you keep claiming that a hybrid is OP, while it absolutely isn't. I indeed wanted 'all', because I'm not some fucking str crutcher but somebody who plays to have fun. I'm also concerned that by cutting down the amount of build options to play a certain class won't help a single bit to keep people playing this mod, or the class ofcourse.
I ain't gonna reply to you next time switch, it takes me hours to fucking form an answer because I have to scroll up all the time to see what you fucking wrote.. I never complained a lvl 35 player wouldn't be able to play cav, when people talk about making a build their aim is usually for lvl 31. You can as many builds at 35 to play a certain class, if there is only one at lvl 31 (one that makes you offer every skill you have in order to get enough str AND agility) you have fucked something up.
Yes, I want to be able to play both cavalry and infantery and fyi, I'm offering up my damage output for that. I have 15 str, I could have gotten way more like you guys did. I'm not both riding and walking at the same time, but when I get dismounted, my 4 years of playing allow me to get a second chance. To fight the other lvl 35's on the battlefield that are overpowering me as well as the lvl 35 cavalry did.
There is a lvl 35 'hybrid' you say? How can you be a cav/infantery hybrid if you don't even have enough wm and if to be viable at any of the two, especially infantery.
My point being with the fact that I can stop extremely easy is that it doesn't fucking matter how much armour you have, if you get stopped by a piker which is extremely easy you are dead anyway.
The HA are everywhere these days, there is no running from them and I'm certain a lot of cav players will agree with me.
Why am I playing heavy cav? Why am I using heavy armour? As I mentioned a thousand times before: I use it because it is fun and it looks fucking awesome.
Yeah, maybe I should run from HA and ranged. I'll just hide behind my team untill I can kill the last guy that is alive because that's a lot of fun right?
Thats why agility was/is/will be OP compared to STR, because it offers a lot more gameplay variety with almost no penalties, while on the other hand STR based build are good for a couple of things only.
You can either be good at one of the two OR, average at both.
So because I have the strengths of a lvl 31 build both at infantery and cav, you wouldn't call that average at both? How do you call a lvl 35 str crutching twohander then? I think you would call him good at twohanded and me average at both.
I also never thought the str nerf was a good idea, I was 15/24 way before that. I think STR crutchers were a great challenge.