Are you complimenting me for having the habit of not extending a local event to an absolute general truth?
YES!
Although I agree to disagree on other interpretations
Because yes, the latest "russian column spotted" might be a fraud, but it doesnt mean there has been no column of russian forces which have entered the territory of Ukraine in the past, Murmillus.
Still, Kuujis, it proves one thing: lies comes from both sides, if you want to know the truth, you have to take no side and analyze thoroughly. Because no government is to be trusted if you seek the truth.
"The rulers of the state are the only persons who ought to have the privilege of lying."
Well... don't tell me you are too lazy to read
<...>
Frankly - both Ukraine and russia are sides in this conflict, thus - natural propaganda sources. <...>
What is significant is that the article states that Ukrainian politicians admit they have no evidence of their claims. So instead of everyone believing everything the Ukrainian government says, NATO igniting a war over such lies and dragging the world into world war 3, they've decided to own up.
Let me rephrase that:
What is significant is that
the article other articles states that
Ukrainian politicians admit russia cannot admit its been lying again and again (well, Crimea is an exception I guess), even though
they have no there are evidence of their claims being false. So instead of everyone believing everything the
Ukrainian government putlers media says,
NATO russia igniting a war over such lies and dragging the world into world war 3,
they've decided to own up they will still never take responsibility and act as grownups.
Russians and other mercenaries are fighting for the rebels in Ukraine, as mercenaries are fighting for the Ukrainian government, as I said on a previous post both sides are playing dirty. However if Ukraine proves that Russia has "Invaded" Ukraine then NATO has threatened military action, and that's the kind of shit we can all do without no?
Let me ask you a few questions:
1. Almost broke Ukraine paying mercenaries? Do you find it as likely as a thief former president, who ran away to russia, being forced to cough up his cash by the very annoyed putler and being forced to supply and fund separatists... Anyway - do you have any reliable sources to claim this? Playing dirty propaganda is one thing, which IS obvious, claiming that there are
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Tights fighting on Ukraine side is on another level of "funny" altogether.
2. NATO explicitly excluded option of military intervention, as Ukraine is not NATO member state. Technical and arms support is another thing, which IS on the table and is IMO justified as much as supplying russia with mistral warships. Or do you object to that too? I do not see, why someone should NOT support Ukraine just because "it may end up with WW3". Vice versa - this "let him have it, maybe it will be enough" mentality is what led to WW2, check your history lessons.
3. "Eating shit is almost the same as eating chocolate (see 2g1cup videos
), and we can all agree that chocolate is tasty". That is how you constructed your last sentence. Looks funny though. Cheap, but funny.