1. Name of your character involvedIRK_Donny
2. Name of offending character(s)Lady_Alexandra_HREr
Admins: Patoson, Dollface
3. Time and server, as accurately as possibletoday, 06.54pm UTC+1, Server EU7 DTV
4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after.First i said one time that the people pls stop to use smokebombs in fight, because u cant the see the enemy or only rarely. Few minutes later some other player say the same, situation relaxed atm. Then a discussion started between IRK_Darko (not me) and some other players (e.g. Lady_Alexandra). The Nub was, that they meant that using smokebombs is griefing/trolling/whatever and the players should stop it. Darko asked for the rule why using smokebombs should be griefing. So much accusations but no proofs or usefull answers.
Main argument, why it is allowed in my opinion is the following: The Devs implemented smokebombs, the bombs do what they do (and are build for) and Darko didnt throw the bombs in fights with any intention. Just at start 2, max 3 Players, thrown their smokebombs. For sure there are enough arguments to remove smokebombs, but i told multiple times in chat, that they dont discuss and cry in ingame chat instead of posting in forum. Then all Admins/Devs see the problem and if enough player have a problem with it, i am sure they will remove the bombs.
But they arent disallowed atm.Now Dollface got active in the chat and he vicariously threatened to ban darko for smokebombing. But that was just the top of the ridiculous discussion, because Darko and me didnt see anything reason to accept his opinion and after minutes of discussion his answer to darkos question (show me the rule pls) was "griefing". So for him its griefing to use smokebombs... basically? really? Cmon, please. If u use smokebombs, it is no griefing. And darko and me see no reason to get limited in the personal liberty to do what u want (if its not disallowed).
Because the Admins have the same opinions like themselves, some other players got a big mouth and started to urge for kickpolling without; without any reason at the beginning, because the discussion was just started. I said to dollface he should kick the poller, because of this. AFAIR: First he didnt do anything and at poll number 2 i asked again and he said reason is griefing (maybe it happened already at poll 1). But the kickpolling person didnt have to say to dollface what the reason is. The top ist, that Patoson used kickpolling (overall 3rd time), to kick Darko... with ~54%
But no admin had enough balls for kicking darko by own power, they only hided behind the mass of players with their opinion. One interesting dialog was like this.
dialog (analogous):
Donny: (to Darko) "just ignore it"
Dollface: "It isnt clever to ignore an admin / his instructions"
Donny: "If the admin dont know the rules [or what is right and not] its clever to follow the rules."
Dollface :(some later after talking to Darko) "enjoy the ban if you furthermore break the rules"
Donny: "Enjoy to get reported to devs and lose adminrights, cause of banning a player for using smokebombs..."
Sorry its very hard for me to tell in english, it would be the best somebody just read the chat log. If u have some questions just ask the involved people then for specific infos.
5. Why you think the offender did what he did.*Because the admins cant bear the fact, that normal players want to correct him, because he is the admin and automatically is in right... idk^^
6. Multiple ScreenshotsLast and Third Kickpoll against Darko:
http://www.myimg.de/?img=Unbenannt0e782.jpgDiscussion started:
http://abload.de/img/crpg_beta2013-11-27186bukv.jpg7. Names of players who witnessed what happened.** IRK_Darko
Admins: Patoson, Dollface