I still believe that in a 1 v 1 scenario the longsword is the ultimate weapon (probably as it should be). The issue I have with it is that the stats are better, by far, than the katana even though the katana is ~3k more expensive.
I understand weeaboo tax or w.e, but 3k is a ton considering the LS is only -1 cut damage, -1 speed from the katana, but has +11 range, and a godlike fast +5pierce stab. LS also has a polearm mode (supposedly about to buffed) for pole nudges, and a slightly higher weight for blockstun.
Make the LS 9-10k, or cut the price of the katana. I know a lot of people have said the exact same thing, I just can't believe the stat difference when compared to the price difference.
OFFTOPIC: For you miaodao haters out there, sure it's powerful and easy to use, but do you really think it's overpowered without a stab?
2h stab is the best attack direction, giving you support abilities in groups, almost complete cav protection, and the ability to use the most effective feints. I find the stats to be fine, maybe up the price to be more like the katana.
Maybe it's more of an issue in EU or CHN, but from what I have seen and experienced, miaodao is mainly a major threat for it's backstab potential on unaware targets. In a face to face battle, a stabless weapon is pretty easy to fight against in comparison to the LS or GS, the main threat becomes it's great synergy with kick. I would like to know what Tydeus thinks of it.