War of Northern Aggression

[HungryNBroke]

IF I WAS KING WE WOULD ALL HAVE AS MANY EQUIPMENT RACKS AS YOU COULD POSSIBLY DREAM OF.

[Sandersson Jankins]

Let's clear this gay-ass shit up.

For about two minutes near the end of the battle (20-30 minutes left) we had five weapons racks active. Someone said in teamspeak "lol we should build five weapon racks to make FCC mad" to which I replied "yeah, make five weapon racks to make them mad."

We had those racks for about two or three minutes until you asked us to take one or two down. We immediately capitulated to your request and took two of them down. The purpose of building those weapons racks was nothing more than a whim of mine to make you upset for a brief period of time. That purpose was fulfilled, so we destroyed two of them for you.

I don't at all regret what I asked people to do. I am only surprised at how quickly we built four weapon racks (I think the desire for a couple folks to lock you out came from us having a single weapon rack and being locked out of building more) to lock you out of building any. I mean shit, I can't get more than one person to spawn with 4 materials at the beginning of a siege to build more than a single weapon rack, but if it involves Keshian's frustration, more than eight people are jumping at the chance to build five racks in a span of 45 seconds.

[Matey]

"lol we should build five weapon racks to make FCC mad" to which I replied "yeah, make five weapon racks to make them mad."

Fuckin CC exploiter scum cheater jerks! ban they all! ALL OF THEY! FOREVERZ 

[Keshian]

They were up for over 15 minutes and I guess there was an actual debate on whether you should stop exploiting and break them for quite a while because "FCC all exploters who build 5 weapon racks every battle (we never do and if we saw a randomer doing it we would break them immediately without a second of debate) and glitch maps (we dont) and cheat their way to winning (I guess thats the only way you could ever possibly lose or do poorly in all those open field battles?)" 

Honestly I'm pretty happy with these sieges, doing normal ratios of k/ds for a castle, hell every one of our sieges so far has had better k/ds then almost every single siege of yruma by ravens and dracul when acre owned it (admittedly acre is pretty awesome, but still impressive).  just need to attack with a few less troops (1500) so we dont waste 2-300 and killing 1200 each time will actually be better average than most sieges  Really appreciate the dedication of our mercs, i know its not easy grinding down castles - but you guys are one of the reasons we are practically the only faction to grind castles and cities down with 5 or more attacks if need be.  Thank you again for repeatedly signing up, it helps out a lot.

[Zlisch_The_Butcher]

Honestly I'm pretty happy with these sieges, doing normal ratios of k/ds for a castle, hell every one of our sieges so far has had better k/ds then almost every single siege of yruma by ravens and dracul when acre owned it (admittedly acre is pretty awesome, but still impressive).  just need to attack with a few less troops (1500) so we dont waste 2-300 and killing 1200 each time will actually be better average than most sieges  Really appreciate the dedication of our mercs, i know its not easy grinding down castles - but you guys are one of the reasons we are practically the only faction to grind castles and cities down with 5 or more attacks if need be.  Thank you again for repeatedly signing up, it helps out a lot.

Kesh no one is denying that you are the greater nerd, calm down.

[Sandersson Jankins]

They were up for over 15 minutes and I guess there was an actual debate on whether you should stop exploiting and break them for quite a while because "FCC all exploters who build 5 weapon racks every battle (we never do and if we saw a randomer doing it we would break them immediately without a second of debate) and glitch maps (we dont) and cheat their way to winning (I guess thats the only way you could ever possibly lose or do poorly in all those open field battles?)" 

The maximum time there could have been five weapon racks on our side was five minutes. Again, we didn't do it to gain an advantage; it was solely to make you upset. I'm glad that I could give ten mercs on our team a gigantic nerd-boner at the thought that you could be angry about it.

(click to show/hide)

This is when you make a post calling me a liar and I respond to that post calling you a liar.

[BaleOhay]

Pretty pathetic.. Hey lets break the rules (granted racks are only gentleman's agreement) just to make 1 person's game worse. I guess the rest of us do not exist. In case you do not notice a lot of us are on the other team. Then to have to vote on if you should break them. The old classic nothing is against the rules if you are doing it to the FCC mindset.

[HardRice]

Man, NA drama sure sucks now. I miss those days of Hosp hating and Huseby shitposting, and when EU/NA actually gave a tinyshit about each other.

Are there actually any rules against having a large number of weapon racks anyway?

[Jack1]

Are there actually any rules against having a large number of weapon racks anyway?

It's more a a genitalman's rule

Pretty pathetic.. Hey lets break the rules (granted racks are only gentleman's agreement) just to make 1 person's game worse. I guess the rest of us do not exist. In case you do not notice a lot of us are on the other team. Then to have to vote on if you should break them. The old classic nothing is against the rules if you are doing it to the FCC mindset.

It was more of a "lets fight fire with fire" mindset. As usual it only made a bigger flame.

[BaleOhay]

there is not a hard rule against it but everyone knows once you start doing it then it will be done against you. It is just not something that should be done. It is a dick move and should not be something used to make other people mad because it is funny.



What rules have we broken that you feel you need to fight fire with fire Jack?  If you think something we have done is breaking the rules let me know and i will address it.

[Jack1]

What rules have we broken that you feel you need to fight fire with fire Jack?  If you think something we have done is breaking the rules let me know and i will address it.

Never did I say that we, or yourselves, did anything wrong in terms of the rules, in the instance that was at hand were you put up a significant number of weapon racks (I believe it was 5 untill I had to suicide cav to break one of yours  that was near catapults firing at the gatehouse walls) many people thought it would be fine to give you the dick just as you gave it to us at the beginning.

(click to show/hide)

afterwords you didn't build another one that was used to attack the castle, so, I don't even understand what the problem was.

[BaleOhay]

we had 2 in back and 2 in front I think at one point for a very short time. We never had 5 to my knowledge. once we built the catapults you broke the second in back and we never rebuilt it

[Jack1]

we had 2 in back and 2 in front I think at one point for a very short time. We never had 5 to my knowledge. once we built the catapults you broke the second in back and we never rebuilt it

Well then lets just agree to disagree.

[BaleOhay]

I get that.. But at what point did we break the one you had inside that Daruvian spent the first 40 mins engineering on?

[Mae.]

WHY WONT IT STOP NOTIFYING ME