What you missed is how you proved yourself flat out wrong in that post: "I bet ya those women wished they could protect themselves, unfortunately they are stuck in the medieval times, fending off this armed intruder with fucking kitchen knives, congratulations real fucking nice policy."
I guess they couldn't afterall, regardless of the loose gun control laws in the country they lived in. /facepalm
As to the rest:
Oh, wow, did you just find every single gun crime since the seventies? That proved what, exactly?
And no, drug dealers and most criminal elements, IN GENERAL, do not have guns here. It's why they keep stabbing and beating each other up, rather than shooting.
Let me try and make it simple for ya: EU - few guns, both for civilians and criminals -> negligible risk of getting shot and killed -> less lethal crime = better.
You have a skewed sense of technological advancement equaling armed shootouts between civilians and criminals.fuck the police!
i think only one of them was from the seventies, most of them being in the 90's and 2000's. It proved a point that you cant make statements that you dont have guns in your country therefore we dont need them, since you dont have guns how were all these obtained, you are missing the point, they are fucking bad guys, they get them anyway, banned or not, that drug dealer had 3 himself. im glad you smacked yourself too, though it prolly didnt knock any sense into you, just because you live in a place that allows it doesnt mean you partake in it, if i lived in Colorado, i wouldnt be smoking marijuana, and the same goes for those women, they didnt have a gun, because they maybe didnt believe in it, therefore they didnt protect themselves with a better means of force, therefore, they are all dead.
