Guns, Guns, and more Guns, Hosted by Inbred Redneck AntiBlitz Ameritrash

[AntiBlitz]

I am fairly sure that gun policy in the U.S. is more of a remnant of old times then the gun policies in Europe, where gun ownership was once free of government control as well. So gun policy has been updated to contain a ban on most firearms here. Adaptation of policy to the times at hand. This might be ridiculously hard to believe for an American, but there is simply no need to own or carry a gun in my country. Not once have I or pretty much anyone thought, gee wish I had a gun. The times at hand provide very little reason to own a gun, let alone carry one, my society is safe.
If someone steals a bike he forfeits his life to the judgement of a trigger-happy cop. Great fucking law system is that. God Americans and their guns, there is no point in even discussing anything until your thinking catches up 200 years. Until you let go of the Wild-West mindset and get some proper appreciation for human life and justice.

you are just reaching for extremes now to troll post, stealing a bike is a misdemeanor crime, no reason to just shoot someone lol, i even linked case law in my other discussions but you are too stubborn to look at what my posts are, because your posting like a fucking blinded horse, in one direction. 

Opinion below:
There is always a need for a gun, one must be able to protect himself, this isnt medieval times, im sorry but im not going to fend off a armed intruder with a fucking butter knife because my government would rather suppress my entire country for 400 years and say people dont need them.  Either way, hows about we just agree to disagree? sound fair?  you and i will never see eye to eye, quite clear.

[FRANK_THE_TANK]

A LOT

There I fixed it for you! Just because your armed doesn't mean you can go around ignoring grammar and spelling willy fucking nilly!

----

I personally don't like guns being available to the general public because the general public are spastic.

Australia has one of the highest rates of assault in the OCED. Give these fuck wits open or concealed carry and a lot of people are going to get shot.

I'm all for tasers, pepper sprays, performance enhancing drugs so on and so forth. I just don't see any reason for someone to have a KRISS SMG in their home. If you want a double barrel shot gun, or a bolt action hunting rifle more power to you. But no one "needs" a hand gun or an automatic weapon. That's war fighting gear and if you are having to fight a war in your own home I advise you move house... sooner the better.

----

I didn't actually open this thread to argue :/

You know I love you blitzypoo.

[AntiBlitz]

There I fixed it for you! Just because your armed doesn't mean you can go around ignoring grammar and spelling willy fucking nilly!

----

I personally don't like guns being available to the general public because the general public are spastic.

Australia has one of the highest rates of assault in the OCED. Give these fuck wits open or concealed carry and a lot of people are going to get shot.

I'm all for tasers, pepper sprays, performance enhancing drugs so on and so forth. I just don't see any reason for someone to have a KRISS SMG in their home. If you want a double barrel shot gun, or a bolt action hunting rifle more power to you. But no one "needs" a hand gun or an automatic weapon. That's war fighting gear and if you are having to fight a war in your own home I advise you move house... sooner the better.

----

I didn't actually open this thread to argue :/

You know I love you blitzypoo.

i dont mind really, its all just opinions, here is mine again lol.  I think wat people fail to see is simply that the damage of allowing guns has already been done, you cannot revert this action to the populous without serious consequences.  We all make due with the cards dealt to us, and history already wrote out how it was going to be.  If your country just had them from the start you might not have those same views, just as Germany serves alcohol to what we would say is minors, and whatever country it was decriminalizing drugs.  Its cultural based, we couldnt do those same things in America, it just wouldnt work, or maybe it would and we just wont try because we have those same extreme views towards it that the people in this thread do.

[Tibe]

i dont mind really, its all just opinions, here is mine again lol.  I think wat people fail to see is simply that the damage of allowing guns has already been done, you cannot revert this action to the populous without serious consequences.  We all make due with the cards dealt to us, and history already wrote out how it was going to be.  If your country just had them from the start you might not have those same views, just as Germany serves alcohol to what we would say is minors, and whatever country it was decriminalizing drugs.  Its cultural based, we couldnt do those same things in America, it just wouldnt work, or maybe it would and we just wont try because we have those same extreme views towards it that the people in this thread do.

Man....those...are...some pretty wierd opinions you have. The highlight of it is that you think that Europe not allowing civilians to carry fully automatic firearms is part of the old world and is a goverment/citizen trust issue. Its none of that. Your liberal law is acctually a remnant of the old world and its really not a trust issue. Majority, in Europe, which I quess is atleast 90% of citizens in every country would never want such liberal gunlaws as you have out there. Nobody even brings this up to discussion here. Because doing so is pointless and very dangerous. I get that majority of the gunnuts are good folks just collecting and being relaxed. But the more deathmachines in circulation, the larger possibility of fatal "accidents". Its the same thing as nobody wanting every country on the planet to have a nuclear weapon arsenal.

Also the selfdefencething? I get that a handgun can be used for selfdefence. But a fullyautomatic assaultrifle. Wat...? Then comes the "I might be outgunned" statement. Who goes thiefing or burglarizing with a assault rilfe? Seriuslly. Oh right murica..... In this part of the world, even getting threatened with an acctual gun is a rarety.

[Xant]

This might be ridiculously hard to believe for an American, but there is simply no need to own or carry a gun in my country. Not once have I or pretty much anyone thought, gee wish I had a gun. The times at hand provide very little reason to own a gun, let alone carry one, my society is safe.

If you're alright with being a sheep, I'm happy that works for you. Just trust blindly in the shepherd and bury your head in the sand. I'm sure it'll be alright.

[Paul]

Guns are just toys for most gun collectors. Others collect Spaes Merins figures or stamps. Although the gun thingy has the advantage that you "could" fuck up your neighbor, his dog and everyone he knows for real if he pissed you off bad enough. Kinda hard clubbing someone to death with a predator model. Also AntiBlitz could arm a milita squad incase the government(if there is one) comes for his freedom. Of course this and the self defense thingy is just bullshit related to immature power fantasies. In the end it's just toys.

[Xant]

In the end it's just toys.

Of course it is, if you have dozens of guns. I don't think anyone is denying that. They can be used as tools, however, when necessary, which makes them a somewhat different breed of toys when compared to stamps.

[Tibe]

I was an idiot for getting dragged into this discussion again. Lets agree to disagree. Not cause I ran out of arguments, lol heck I got enough for atleast 200 posts, but because its kinda like the arguing about religion over the internet. Its better to be dropped then discussed.

My apologies for ruining this thread fellow gentlemen.

[Xant]

What happens if you disagree to disagree? Do you agree in that case? I wasn't aware disagreement needed agreement.

[Tibe]

It counts for a standstill, I quess...

[Xant]

What you really mean is "I'm going to stop arguing."

[Tibe]

Do you really have to be a douche about it?

[Xant]

Obviously. An even better information-efficient way of conveying that you're going to stop arguing is to stop posting. "Let's agree to disagree" is just a way of trying to save face while backing out of an argument. Looks more sophisticated and civilized and as if you didn't really concede anything, you're just retreating with dignity. Which is, of course, false.

[Tibe]

Nice try. Not falling for it.

[Xant]

As a final example, a buffer overflow checker flagged a bunch of errors of the form

unsigned p[4]; ... p[4] = 1;

"No, ANSI lets you write 1 past the end of the array."

After heated argument, the programmer said, "We'll have to agree to disagree."