Poll

"Patched" Game: Your Rating.

1
6 (9.1%)
2
5 (7.6%)
3
5 (7.6%)
4
1 (1.5%)
5
8 (12.1%)
6
9 (13.6%)
7
13 (19.7%)
8
10 (15.2%)
9
4 (6.1%)
10
5 (7.6%)

Total Members Voted: 66

Author Topic: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating  (Read 29216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tibe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1335
  • Infamy: 287
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #45 on: September 23, 2013, 05:20:37 pm »
0
Unfortunately true dat.

Offline Adamar

  • He who doesn't want to be labelled
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 422
  • Infamy: 319
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #46 on: September 23, 2013, 06:12:32 pm »
+3
People like Nightmare798 are the reason Dragon age has been turning into a button mashing franchise.

Offline Molly

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1860
  • Infamy: 693
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • For the glorious Khorin...
  • Game nicks: Molly
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #47 on: September 23, 2013, 08:03:32 pm »
0
DA:O was an epic role-playing game cuz it was actually a full classic role-playing game. It was what RPG used to stand for: epic story with proper storytelling, party-based combat which can be fine-tuned with the settings (not to mention the tactics options) and nice graphics and music.
You didn't like it? Fine. Nobody cares. Overrated? Surely not. Underrated? Probably neither...

I like Rome2 with the new patch better.
When west germany annexed east germany, nobody moved a finger too.

Offline Nightmare798

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 400
  • Infamy: 502
  • cRPG Player
  • Darksider on redemption
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #48 on: September 24, 2013, 12:59:27 pm »
0
People like Nightmare798 are the reason Dragon age has been turning into a button mashing franchise.

as opposed to click that and watch it die franchise eh?
Tseng: Used to the bitter taste of refusal, this only serves to reinforce his greatest life lession yet.
Cloud: And that is?
Tseng: Bitches, man.

Offline pingpong

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 423
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #49 on: September 24, 2013, 02:20:27 pm »
0
This game is streamlined pile of poo, CA devs were like: hey lets remove every feature that added depth to the game because we thinks its just BOORING and NOT NECESSARY because its hip to be so chic and MINIMALISTIC so STREAMLINE EVERYTHING, and lets make battles last 5min because this game is TOTALLY NOT about battles that took effort, time and planning to win, not cap some gay ass flag, also the game runs like my 89yr. old grandpa with a heart defect. -1/10

 

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #50 on: September 24, 2013, 03:25:19 pm »
0
Started an MP campaign yesterday. So far turn times are really fast and no connection issues at all. A bit of lag on some battles but usually only massive cluster fuck peasant army ones. Will see how slow turns are in 100 turns but for now it seems fine.

Offline Adamar

  • He who doesn't want to be labelled
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 422
  • Infamy: 319
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #51 on: September 24, 2013, 08:34:20 pm »
0
as opposed to click that and watch it die franchise eh?

No, as opposed to strategic thinking and unit combination, that you dont do when you're too busy clicking on the enemy.

Offline Nightmare798

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 400
  • Infamy: 502
  • cRPG Player
  • Darksider on redemption
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #52 on: September 24, 2013, 09:38:01 pm »
0
No, as opposed to strategic thinking and unit combination, that you dont do when you're too busy clicking on the enemy.

there is no real strategy in combat of dragon age origins.

mage: spam aoe spells as much as possible.
warrior: spam shield bash and similar skills as much as possible.
rogue: spam dirty fighting as much as possible.

traps are useless because enemy rarely goes out and attacks you.

so it boils down to this:

send warrior to tank and use rouge to either: backstab, or stand back and spam ranged skills.
keep mage back and use all your spells and chug on mana potions.

rinse and repeat.

THATS COMPLETE STRATEGY GUIDE! CONGRATS! YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WON THE GAME!
Tseng: Used to the bitter taste of refusal, this only serves to reinforce his greatest life lession yet.
Cloud: And that is?
Tseng: Bitches, man.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #53 on: September 24, 2013, 10:14:47 pm »
0
enemy rarely goes out and attacks you.

so it boils down to this:

send warrior to tank and use rouge to either: backstab, or stand back and spam ranged skills.
keep mage back and use all your spells and chug on mana potions.

rinse and repeat.

THATS COMPLETE STRATEGY GUIDE! CONGRATS! YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WON THE GAME!

Not sure what game you were playing. Enemy always came and attacked me.

Also not sure how this differs from most games. Even warband is an element of this. Maybe go play some 10 hour fps games more?

Offline Bulzur

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 465
  • Infamy: 102
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild.
  • Game nicks: Guard_Bulzur
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #54 on: September 24, 2013, 10:19:57 pm »
0
Could you please stop posting unrelevant things Nightmare798... this is a Rome2 topic, in case you haven't noticed.

There's something called private messages (PM) for your discussions with Adamar. And don't bring the "he started it", even if it's true, it's childish.



Back to Rome 2 :

- The launch was unfitting of any awaited game : 3/10
- The few patches they brought relatively quickly made it back to a decent level : 7/10

Still taking a few points back for the obvious unpolished game (unit cards forming two lines, where one is incomplete at max stack, unit cards being just ugly, with an hp bar instead of remaining units/total units,...), and a lot of things being just dumbed down.

With some good mod support, i believe it can reach a solid 9/10.
I don't regret having pre-ordered this game at only 15% reduction.


(click to show/hide)
[14:36] <@chadz> when you login there is a message "your life as horse archer was too depressing for you. you decided to commit suicide. please create a new char"
[19:32] <@chadz> if(dave_ukr_is_in_server) then rain_chance = 98%;

Offline Nightmare798

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 400
  • Infamy: 502
  • cRPG Player
  • Darksider on redemption
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #55 on: September 24, 2013, 10:34:25 pm »
0
Not sure what game you were playing. Enemy always came and attacked me.

Also not sure how this differs from most games. Even warband is an element of this. Maybe go play some 10 hour fps games more?

sure, i dont enjoy poorly made rpg combat system, so i must be the call off duty/battlefield fan with attention span of a dog, right? RIGHT???

you know combat in this game reminds me of mmos. i would go as far as to say they just copied wow combat, gave you a party, and cut the skill tree pretty short.

Code: [Select]
Could you please stop posting unrelevant things Nightmare798... this is a Rome2 topic, in case you haven't noticed.

There's something called private messages (PM) for your discussions with Adamar. And don't bring the "he started it", even if it's true, it's childish.

very well, i will heed this for i agree i am sorta thread jacking. as for who started it, i believe it is me who started the discussion about combat in dragon age origins, just to clarify it.
Tseng: Used to the bitter taste of refusal, this only serves to reinforce his greatest life lession yet.
Cloud: And that is?
Tseng: Bitches, man.

Offline Adamar

  • He who doesn't want to be labelled
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 422
  • Infamy: 319
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #56 on: September 24, 2013, 10:37:26 pm »
0
there is no real strategy in combat of dragon age origins.

mage: spam aoe spells as much as possible.
warrior: spam shield bash and similar skills as much as possible.
rogue: spam dirty fighting as much as possible.

traps are useless because enemy rarely goes out and attacks you.

so it boils down to this:

send warrior to tank and use rouge to either: backstab, or stand back and spam ranged skills.
keep mage back and use all your spells and chug on mana potions.

rinse and repeat.

THATS COMPLETE STRATEGY GUIDE! CONGRATS! YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WON THE GAME!

That's true in DA2. In origins you had way more builds and troop combinations to try than that, unless you didn't bother playing outside the box. It was your choice what type of armor and weapons your warriors, rogues, and mages used, with the right build you didn't need warriors at all, but you had to adapt your strategy, tie up the enemy in a great many ways and learn how to control the fight with what you had at your disposal. DA 2 was the simplistic bullshit you described, where sadly it all comes down to how much damage you inflict on the enemy before your party dies.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #57 on: September 24, 2013, 11:00:07 pm »
0
Ok, well You know, I think I should make a poll now that the game has been out for a bit.

Also, take your Dragon Age shit to a different topic. We don't care, we want to praise or Bash Rome...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Ninja_Khorin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1067
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Zen
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan Ninja
  • Game nicks: Khorin/Keyoke/Lujan
  • IRC nick: Khorin
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #58 on: September 25, 2013, 01:02:58 am »
0
Just had a friendly game of co-op with a fellow ninja. This is what happened in a few hours worth of gameplay.

1. Overall shitty performance. My Napoleon and Shogun 2 battles run way better.
2. AI doing the classic "rush the flag through the defenders line"-tactic.
3. AI doing the classic "stand still and turn your back to the enemy  while being shot at"-tactic
4. AI doing the classic "abandon our last city, otherwise we might lose our army"-tactic, resulting in nothing at all.
5.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

6. Syracuse with the world's largest moshpit, and their allies doing the largest congo line.
(click to show/hide)

Needless to say we declared war on everyone out of boredom, because there was no challenge still. We played on very hard. The we just quit because even that didn't make it any more interesting.

It's still bad pretty bad compared to previous titles. 6/10.

Offline Lizard_man

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 717
  • Infamy: 153
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Lizard_man, Jinmenju
Re: Rome 2: Opinions/Rating
« Reply #59 on: September 25, 2013, 01:50:49 am »
0
Dead game... :|
visitors can't see pics , please register or login