You are hopeless in this regard.
See the first possible occasion, then start nitpicking like it's fuel for your living or something. yawn.
The point in hypocrite was, that they clearly endorse and use weaponry that causes harm in ways like chemical warfare, yet they point fingers at others doing it and make them look like "war criminals". Is it hard to understand or what.
Yes, when it comes to logic, I'm hopeless in trying to suppress it. Of course you'd call it nitpicking when it undermines your entire retarded statement.
As said, Agent Orange was used as a defoliant. Did it end up killing people? Yes, but that wasn't intended nor was it known it would, or they wouldn't have sent in their own soldiers unprotected afterwards. And again, it was war. Assad is using it on his own citizens.
Using napalm doesn't count as "chemical warfare." Fire that's somewhat harder to put out isn't exactly something that's in the same category as real chemical warfare.
So what the US has done is used a defoliant in a war because they had serious problems with guerrillas hiding in the jungles... and Assad uses chemical weapons meant to kill people on his own unarmed citizens.
Not to mention that the current US government is not the same one that ordered the use of Agent Orange.... in fact, this is the most important point. They are not
even the same people.
Hypocrites? Hardly.
