well either way we all know the U.N will send NATO to do something in this(i thought i saw on the news that France was saying they were going to send airstrikes, and we are sending Missiles from our ships at sea) and our president said we will not be sending troops in as of now, which i think is what most people dont want to happen(we just ended a war, and i think our people need time to mend the wounds before we have more fallen heroes).
From my view point, either way if we shoot them from the fuckin ocean we still spend like 3 million every missile, to blow them up, so we still go farther into debt. But somebody needs to help the people out there, because, its sad that they cant even sleep in their own beds now without fear of not waking up the next morning or finding their children all dead. I would prefer if we didnt send troops to Syria as i feel it will just be another "world police action from America" kinda thing, but then again, you dont see any other country ever step up to the plate and put out the same effort that we do. Granted you all sent troops to help fight alongside us in several wars, but it was only to hold that political right to say "ya we helped" when you only sent 1 regiment to our 100.
So TL:DR, someones has to do something to help these poor folks out or are you ok with letting a leader walk away and live in a Mediterranean side palace in the lap of luxury knowing he just slaughtered his country in the name of "peace and prosperity for Syria".