Author Topic: Ranged to Melee Ratio  (Read 3156 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Umbra

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems, Freak Army of Gnjus
  • Game nicks: Umbra
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2013, 03:52:58 pm »
+1
(click to show/hide)

Lolz yeah guise just get shield or hide nabz amarite?

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Canary

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 826
  • Infamy: 202
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2013, 10:10:41 pm »
+3
Melee says to ranged: "shooting is no fair, it's hard to retaliate against!"

Ranged responds to melee: "get a shield if you don't want to get shot!"

Melee thinks it over; why, I'd have to stop using my chosen weapon and change my spec to something else entirely if I wanted to use a shield.



Ranged says to melee: "patch was no fair, I was nerfed too hard and can't kill or survive as efficiently anymore!"

Melee responds to ranged: "looks like it's time to spec out of ranged, then!"

Ranged does not take this retort in stride, however still changes spec and takes points in riding and horse archery to spite the nay-saying melee.


(click to show/hide)

Offline HappyPhantom

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 440
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Pew pew, your face!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul, Always Take the Shot.
  • Game nicks: HappyPhantom, Marys of the Sea, Ancient of Mu Mu.
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2013, 12:11:13 am »
0
To avoid being shot:

1. engage in melee - as a ranged, I'm less likely to shoot you if my chances of TW are higher (zomg! I know right!! I must be the only one)

2. never run in a straight line

3. never stand in the same place for prolonged periods of time

Frankly I don't see why everyone has such a hard time avoiding ranged.
"Darklands" - The greatest game you never played: now on Steam http://store.steampowered.com/app/327930 | http://www.darklands.net/index.shtml
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vodner

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 526
  • Infamy: 73
  • cRPG Player
  • SaulCanner
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: SaulCanner
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2013, 12:31:13 am »
+2
1. engage in melee - as a ranged, I'm less likely to shoot you if my chances of TW are higher (zomg! I know right!! I must be the only one)
About 90% of the time I get shot by ranged, it's while I'm engaged in melee. You have severely limited movement options once engaged, as you need to stick to enemies to stop them from hitting friendlies, and you need to footwork appropriately as necessitated by melee.

Offline Palurgee

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 607
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: palurgee, brokeback_mountaineer, denarii
  • IRC nick: palurgee
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2013, 12:44:52 am »
+1
2. never run in a straight line

Any archer or crossbowman worth his salt knows how to hit a target that isn't moving in a straight line, if with slightly more effort.

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2013, 02:12:03 am »
+1
Any archer or crossbowman worth his salt knows how to hit a target that isn't moving in a straight line, if with slightly more effort.

True, but given a choice between targets, it is the immobile, and then the straight line runner and not the juker involved in a swirling melee who gets chosen as a target. S key heroes get targeted because a: they aren't truly involved in melee and b: they usually back in a straight line and c: the stun gives your teammates a chance to catch the bastard.  :P
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2013, 07:35:42 am »
+3
Does anyone else sometimes feel like the meta-game operates based on what will piss people off more?

LLJK and all of its members figured this out 2 years ago.
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2013, 06:50:08 pm »
0
As a lightly armored ninja with 8 athletics and 13.1 total eqipment weight I say - ranged isn't too bad.
Yes sometimes it's getting hard to survive though. I'm not really sure if that means ranged is OP or not.

PS: Just for the record - I once charged a group of 3 archers in open field (completely stupid move, especially for ninja. Or maybe not that stupid, for a ninja?) and killed them all, only getting shot 1 or 2 times.

Offline Angantyr

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1134
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2013, 07:00:18 pm »
0
CRPG are closing in on being more like Native than it has since the earliest versions; more ranged and more shielders than ever.

Less range spam and more manual block is why I chose cRPG over any other module, in the first place.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2013, 08:01:55 pm »
+3
As many as there are people that want to play ranged

This


Yet in order for that to work, there should be a way to balance the archery population ingame.

Even making the ridiculous assumption that there's an effective way of countering archers (be it shields that kill archers from afar, or cav with 18PS that teleport behind archers, or hive-minds of 2h and polearms that can continuously evade shots from two directions at once on sloped terrain...), it simply does not work as a mitigating factor against the rise of the ranged population. Still assuming something counters archers (apart from more archers), winning that way isn't necessarily fun. In the case of the shielders or camping/waiting for the flags to spawn, it is rather necessarily the most boring thing ever. Choosing between winning and having fun, I'll chose having fun, which also means I'm going to quit the server at some point if it goes on. A high density of archers shouldn't have as consequence that everybody would want to play ranged too. It should push players to chose some other class which is effective and fun to play against archers. Even though the first part is "debatable", the second isn't, there's no such thing.


To avoid being shot:

1. engage in melee - as a ranged, I'm less likely to shoot you if my chances of TW are higher (zomg! I know right!! I must be the only one)

2. never run in a straight line

3. never stand in the same place for prolonged periods of time

Frankly I don't see why everyone has such a hard time avoiding ranged.

What's important is the relative difficulty of surviving ranged and melee. The average player survives when engaged in melee much longer than what the game was designed for, and this just keeps on increasing. Quite bluntly people block much better than they used to, but there's only so much you can do against projectiles. The instant someone shoots at you, it is in most cases already too late, even with a shield. There's very little room for increasing your ability to survive projectiles without hindering your playstyle (hiding somewhere and being  useless just for the sake of surviving ranged just means the enemy ranged won without even killing you), because it is very dependent on both luck and your stats, and very little on your input. Surviving melee on the other hand is the opposite. Even with a wooden stick and a level 1 character a good player can survive melee for entire minutes. Applying everything you said and much much more to avoid being killed by ranged still doesn't reach the same level or certainty you won't die.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #25 on: July 23, 2013, 08:19:11 pm »
+3
I play C-rpg and Warband because it's the closest thing I'm going to get from a video game to fighting as a solo combatant (as part of a larger unit) in the middle ages.  Not just for melee, not just for riding around on a horse, not just for shooting a bow and arrow, for all of it.

I don't think there should be limits on the amount of people playing a certain class, it should be up to whatever the person chooses.  That being said, the team balance could do a way better job of balancing the teams so that it's not 40 archers on one team, and 10 on the other. 

If I was putting together an army (in crpg) I'd want about 30% ranged, 30% cavalry, and 40% infantry.  Where the ranged and cavalry are mainly supporting the infantry.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Elindor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1178
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Caelitus mihi vires
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Order of the Holy Guard
  • Game nicks: Elindor
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2013, 06:18:32 pm »
+3
Too many ranged?  I notice all of you are talking about battle.  I have noticed the increase as well, and although I like battle and plan to play both modes....

Come to the darkside and play Siege once in a while!
"NOOBS EVRYWARE ALL SEEG PLYARS ARE BADDDIES AND NO ARH3rS!!!!" (right?)

No but seriously there are less archers on siege....oddly enough.  And there are plenty of good players.

And guess what.
(click to show/hide)

Support NA2 2013 :mrgreen:
Elindor, Archon of the Holy Guard
Holy Guard Thread :HERE
Banner Shop : HERE // Map Thread : HERE

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #27 on: July 24, 2013, 06:59:30 pm »
0
Having only one life per round is much better than respawning.  Getting kills is much more meaningful, as is staying alive. 

Also, I can't also play CK2 when I'm playing siege, I can in battle mode (if I die).   :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Tydeus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1422
  • Infamy: 351
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Item re-unbalance guy
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tydeus
  • IRC nick: Tydeus
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #28 on: July 25, 2013, 11:10:54 pm »
+2
(click to show/hide)
Instead, you get to die once (even if it's on the front lines), and have your flag capped before you have a chance to reach the flags with your second life, or worse yet, even respawn. Shit happens to me all the time, regardless of the amount of players in the server. It's actually the most infuriating aspect of siege for me. It doesn't matter how well you played up to that point, how great your defense/teamwork/cooperation was, you die once, and it can be over before you have a chance to do anything again.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 01:41:58 am by Tydeus »
chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character

Offline Grumpy_Nic

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1023
  • Infamy: 306
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Hermann_von_Krems
Re: Ranged to Melee Ratio
« Reply #29 on: July 29, 2013, 11:06:57 am »
0
Instead, you get to die once (even if it's on the front lines), and have your flag capped before you have a chance to reach the flags with your second life, or worse yet, even respawn. Shit happens to me all the time, regardless of the amount of players in the server. It's actually the most infuriating aspect of siege for me. It doesn't matter how well you played up to that point, how great your defense/teamwork/cooperation was, you die once, and it can be over before you have a chance to do anything again.

This. I hardly play siege but from time to time, when battle pisses me off, I play siege. Usually when defending the flag I spawn on the other side of the map which is bullcrap or as Tydeus mentioned, I dont spawn at all because its over.