1. Not out of the map
2. Not an exploit
3. Not used to gain advantage or with malicious intent
4. Not used for long lengths of time or staying in there when last alive
5. No kind of bro-coding, everyone inside the church fought it out deathmatch style
1.
In this shot we see Jesus and a few others in a spot that the enemy team cannot reach because of an invisible barrier.
2.
Clearly not the way the map was designed to be played.
3.
Hitting people without them being able to see you because you are inside a building is gaining an advantage over them with malicious intent.
4.
Fair enough.
5.
Fair enough.
Lastly if you were truly mad enough at people having fun you could have used the opportunity to use words and ask us to stop instead of taking pictures and trying to be an internet hall monitor.
If admins want to ban anyone, ban me because those screenshots really have no context and none of those people deserve a ban. I was the one encouraging people to fight inside.
Forgive me but I have never found you to be responsive to people asking you to stop doing something (I like you btw, I simply will not allow my fondness for you to let you get away with exploiting). I asked twice in admin chat if an admin was on and if they could say something to you about it, and there was apparently no admin on. The next logical step for reporting rule violations is the ban section. I did not post here to cause drama but rather because of your blatant disregard for rules that everyone else follows.
And in the 50+ screenshots you'll notice not one person complaining. So why should anyone get banned because of some passive aggressive scumbag who clearly wants as many people to get banned as possible (not including his own friends of course)?
Admins have asked you in the past not to go in the church, and I did not do this because I want to get as many people banned as possible. In fact I really only feel allers and you deserve a ban, however it would be unconscionable of me to post a ban thread for you and not them because they used the same exploit you did, albeit to a lesser extent.
As to this "friend" that you and taken are referencing I would like to see some evidence (such as I have supplied) or at least a name to back up your wild accusations.