Robert Namo - leeching and exploiting

[Dexxtaa]

(click to show/hide)

Dexxtaa is useless of course nothing happened

So nice of you to bring the focus of this discussion out on a tangent.

Regardless, it's nice to see you again, idlewild. I've missed splitting your face with a variety of weapons as you desperately try to use your right mouse button. To no avail of course (credit where it's due).

Moving back on topic, I wasn't notified of this behavior. I apologize to the offended parties. I try to keep an eye on the chat, but things slip through, since I have incoming messages in game, on steam as well as teamspeak.

I've even taken to a second monitor to keep track of all the going ons on my screens.

[Gristle]

The only people I won't attack unless there's no one else are Miley and Tavern Keeper. If that's bannable (it shouldn't be), letting people duel at the end of a round should be as well. Frankly, I think that's an even worse offense. At least I'll fight anyone if they're the last alive.

[Count_Grishnackh]

Caring about others leeching, and not just QMLing them and then moving on

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[SirCymro_Crusader]

.

[Legs]

It really comes down to whether people can choose who they want to fight.

Some examples besides 'bro coding'
- leaving helpless peasants and afks alone
- avoiding confrontation with certain classes and players
- letting people duel (not the same as enforcing duels)
etc

It seems like some people think that the only proper way to play cRPG is to constantly be charging straight at the nearest enemy, but we don't all think that kind of play is fun. If you want to be a bloodthirsty berserker that's fine, but please don't try to force it on people who just want to chill and have a good time.

[Lt_Anders]

It really comes down to whether people can choose who they want to fight.

Some examples besides 'bro coding'
- leaving helpless peasants and afks alone
- avoiding confrontation with certain classes and players
- letting people duel (not the same as enforcing duels)
etc

It seems like some people think that the only proper way to play cRPG is to constantly be charging straight at the nearest enemy, but we don't all think that kind of play is fun. If you want to be a bloodthirsty berserker that's fine, but please don't try to force it on people who just want to chill and have a good time.

And this is what Namo did. Avoiding shooting another ranged person(clan mate) and clan mate refused to shoot namo. Now if it was clan mate + namo and some random dude, Namo WILL go for clan mate. Simple as that. But, while he has the CHOICE on who to engage, he chose NOT to engage him.

Anyone else in here trying to say "Namo's a shitty player, scrub stop being homo", then I'll ask every single one of them: "Have you EVER not engaged someone, primarily peasents, cause you didn't want to? Well Welcome to the Bro club."

[Teeth]

And this is what Namo did. Avoiding shooting another ranged person(clan mate) and clan mate refused to shoot namo. Now if it was clan mate + namo and some random dude, Namo WILL go for clan mate. Simple as that. But, while he has the CHOICE on who to engage, he chose NOT to engage him.

Anyone else in here trying to say "Namo's a shitty player, scrub stop being homo", then I'll ask every single one of them: "Have you EVER not engaged someone, primarily peasents, cause you didn't want to? Well Welcome to the Bro club."

I think there is a difference between choosing not to engage an enemy because you feel your time is better spent elsewhere and standing next to an enemy for a prolonged period of time, even shielding this enemy from ranged fire by friendless, while not attacking this enemy. There is a clear difference in incentives noticable through this behaviour.

Besides, everyone chases peasant kills.

[HarryCrumb]

People ignore peasants?

[sexthriller]

who cares Robert Namo #1 NA player

Dont know why you would jump on Dexxtas shit like that, assuming he is dead. Guy is a beast of a player, but he already knew that because hipster.

[Lt_Anders]

I think there is a difference between choosing not to engage an enemy because you feel your time is better spent elsewhere and standing next to an enemy for a prolonged period of time, even shielding this enemy from ranged fire by friendless, while not attacking this enemy. There is a clear difference in incentives noticable through this behaviour.

Besides, everyone chases peasant kills.

Which, even if we take the OP's statement at True value, he never sheilded him from fire. The OP only said Partially, which means that those who come from the side of the horse would be blocked(assuming this was Namos alt as his main isn't a archer)

And I've seen this SAME practice done multiple times on NA. Where people do this or stand in front of Friendly range obscuring their shot against a friend. Why is this, in particular brought up against namo?

[Swaggart]

Everyone does it so its ok? Someone should've told all them chocolate chip cookies at Nuremberg this brilliant defense.

Anyway, this seems like a lot of drama over nothing.

[Dexxtaa]

Explain this logic Dexxta:

You found it hard enough to focus on one screen where everything was all compiled together so you got a second screen which means you now have to focus on 2 instead of 1 which doubles your workload.....

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Speaking from experience it is not hard to admin a server, speak to people on steam and Teamspeak....

Window mode Warband, when you are dead move your steam chat over part of the warband screen so you can have womanly gossip on steam whilst keeping an eye on in-game chat, and then TS does not require you to look at it to speak so i don't understand what is so difficult about that. Simples.

Furthermore:

So you are focused on the chat but you still miss things in-game? Really....?

I will be brief with you since it's clear you're not able to comprehend the situation as it stands.

I have multiple monitors to keep track of multiple platforms because, unlike your incapable self, I have multiple responsibilities over multiple platforms.

Let me simplify it further for you. More screens = more pretty pictures, understand ?

Before you try to paint a picture out of context, suspend - for a moment  - your moronic belief that we are out to get you. We are not your babysitter. I have better things to do than police each and every person on the server. If not for the community input, we are not omnipresent. Get that through your thick skull.

While you bitch with your friends on steam and teamspeak, I am handling requests and resolving issues. Not just in this game but in real situations. I'm sorry Robert hurt your precious feelings, you insolent pup.

[Dooz]

I can't wait until you people are running the country.

[CID_REAL_CID_]

ROBERT NAMO is an hero, leave him alone

[Havoco]

Oman Trebor does what Oman Trebor wants.


He wants to betray his team to block his clan mate on the other team? Oman will do it!