Author Topic: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.  (Read 4330 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Espwn

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 146
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Free Companies of Calradia (Bridgeburners)
  • Game nicks: Frodo_BRD, Samwise_the_Stouthearted
Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« on: April 22, 2013, 09:31:24 am »
+8
SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING. GO TO WAR. BACK-STAB. SOMETHING.

Stop sitting in your fiefs and go crazy. You pacifists make the game boring.

Here, I'll start war(s) right now:

(click to show/hide)


There, now go attack each other.




(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: April 25, 2013, 07:04:32 am by Espwn »

Offline Rhekimos

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 672
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • ふふふふふ
    • View Profile
    • Forbiddena
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Rhekimos
  • IRC nick: Rhekimos
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2013, 09:38:50 am »
+4
Nobody wants to make a significant attack when siege gear is bugged. Taking strongholds will net you massive casualties and the enemy is sure to attack once the siege gear is fixed. So, only beat-downs and skirmishes for now.

Offline DUKE DICKBUTT

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 138
  • Infamy: 119
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2013, 09:39:17 am »
+2
Nobody wants to make a significant attack when siege gear is bugged. Taking strongholds will net you massive casualties and the enemy is sure to attack once the siege gear is fixed. So, only beat-downs and skirmishes for now.

But we just did.

Offline sdfjkln

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 77
  • Infamy: 22
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2013, 09:42:12 am »
+3
I have a battle tomorrow frodo feel free to sign up  :D.

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=battledetail&id=3383

Offline Rhekimos

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 672
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • ふふふふふ
    • View Profile
    • Forbiddena
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Rhekimos
  • IRC nick: Rhekimos
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2013, 09:45:27 am »
+2
But we just did.

I was in many of those fights. Congrats on taking New Ichamur despite the last flag being unreachable.

Offline Sparvico

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 976
  • Infamy: 174
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Steam ID: Sparvico
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mossbacks
  • Game nicks: Sparvico et al.
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2013, 10:34:27 am »
+1
They didn't so much as take it as Hospitaller gave it up because they ultimately were not comfortable using a bug to win. I am not saying if that last siege had happened without the bug they would have won (they would not have). I'm saying that because of the bug they could have won, but instead they decided to accept the admins decision without incident and give the fight up.
Quote
Mossback_Westwood: "I swear 2 my semitic God if you give me this bundle of sticks's address I'll cut off his ear and eat it"

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2013, 01:21:42 pm »
0
we would have won anyway.... just would have taken longer. healing tents going up and plate vrs naked. would have had to come out eventually.
Leader of BS

Offline Turboflex

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 648
  • Infamy: 212
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ravens of Valhalla
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2013, 07:57:56 pm »
+2
Yeah it just would have taken another hour of killing the final 300 naked spawns trickling out of that unreachable spot. Not very fun for anyone at 2am.

Offline Canary

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 826
  • Infamy: 202
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2013, 09:09:19 pm »
+1
I was gonna go to war, but then I had trouble choosing who I should fight.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2013, 09:15:12 pm »
+7
I was gonna go to war, but then I had trouble choosing who I should fight.

The story of CHAOS in strat 4.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2013, 09:20:20 pm »
+3
The story of CHAOS in strat 4.

No matter who we attacked we were screwed, two biggest factions NA are allied with one another at worst and neutral with one another at best. Save up troops entire iteration and still have less available than the faction we go to war with, lolol. Oh well.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2013, 09:24:04 pm »
0
No matter who we attacked we were screwed, two biggest factions NA are allied with one another at worst and neutral with one another at best. Save up troops entire iteration and still have less available than the faction we go to war with, lolol. Oh well.

Well when everyone else is fighting us it sure wouldn't make much sense for us to fight each other.

Offline Turboflex

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 648
  • Infamy: 212
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ravens of Valhalla
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2013, 09:26:52 pm »
+2
No matter who we attacked we were screwed, two biggest factions NA are allied with one another at worst and neutral with one another at best. Save up troops entire iteration and still have less available than the faction we go to war with, lolol. Oh well.

you guys must have really low renown scores

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2013, 09:29:03 pm »
+4
No matter who we attacked we were screwed, two biggest factions NA are allied with one another at worst and neutral with one another at best. Save up troops entire iteration and still have less available than the faction we go to war with, lolol. Oh well.

#yolo

Offline Canary

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 826
  • Infamy: 202
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
Re: Yeah, I have an issue with current NA Strat.
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2013, 09:34:22 pm »
+2
The story of CHAOS in strat 4.

Exactly.


#yolo

We been wiped in strat afore, an' if'n we was fixin' t'do it ageen we'd right well take to it, I reckon.

Ahyuk.