Author Topic: BF4  (Read 12461 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: BF4
« Reply #60 on: October 05, 2013, 04:00:12 pm »
0


I however doubt we'll see it relaunched soon, given Titanfall resembles it, and all Respawn Entertainment would need to do is add a similar 2142 Titan gamemode and they're set.
I'm throwing my money at Titanfall and staying far away from the Battlefield franchise (unless max sale somewhere :P).

I'm with you on this one, Titanfall I'm sure will be the new trendsetter for the FPS in the future years just like COD4:Modern Warfare was. In the next 2/3 years it will be all about future warfare, kinda looking forawrd to it. Will most likely purchase Titanfall.
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #61 on: October 05, 2013, 04:55:23 pm »
+7
I'm not going to buy Battlefield 4 because it feels like a ripoff. Even though everyones hating on Dice they're still killin' it with the trailer music  :D
Pfft, the guys wrote a killer theme in 1942 and now they have just been reducing it more and more until there are only farting noises left.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #62 on: October 05, 2013, 05:26:47 pm »
+1
Pfft, the guys wrote a killer theme in 1942 and now they have just been reducing it more and more until there are only farting noises left.

(click to show/hide)

laughed

imo 1943 sounds the best

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #63 on: October 05, 2013, 06:18:55 pm »
-1
Battlefield 4 = BF3.5


honestly I think thats too generous.

altho BF3 was actually a pretty good game if you didn't play on the cod maps. it was a pretty big step up from the previous game bc2, I would say it is better than bf2 unmodded. I think alot of bf vets hate for it was just nostalgia or not being able to afford a new computer, altho some of it was justified. bf4 however is really not a step up at all unless your on console.

if they brought back bc2 destruction that alone would make it worth buying, EA/dice are so stupid.

Offline BASNAK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1349
  • Infamy: 170
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: MolonLave_Garlic
Re: BF4
« Reply #64 on: October 05, 2013, 06:24:03 pm »
0
altho BF3 was actually a pretty good game if you didn't play on the cod maps. it was a pretty big step up from the previous game bc2

I used to love playing Metro 24/7 64 player servers which is as arcady as it can get. Best maps in my opinion were the CQ maps.

Think Im starting to become a dirty casual.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #65 on: October 05, 2013, 06:56:46 pm »
+2
I used to love playing Metro 24/7 64 player servers which is as arcady as it can get. Best maps in my opinion were the CQ maps.

Think Im starting to become a dirty casual.

metro meat grinder lol, it was only good for grinding levels

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #66 on: October 05, 2013, 07:30:49 pm »
0
What I dislike about Battlefield is the vehicles, which is half the game really. As someone who loves playing infantry I often find that you are seldomly equipped as a squad to be able to properly deal with a tank, enemy squads and enemy air vehicles. Being in a tank does give you a better position compared to the average infantryman, and as I didn't like playing in a tank much I was always on the receiving end of that better position. Often you feel like you just have no chance and it gets frustrating, switching class all the time only to be faced by your counter all the time. I played Battlefield 2 like 300 hours on infantry only mode on Strike at Karkand, which I really enjoyed back then. Played it again more recently and I was appalled at the shooting mechanics, hit detection and the entire system were pretty horrible. But 64 player matches with only infantry were pretty intense.

I bought Battlefield 3 but only played it 20 hours. I thought maps and gameplay were very chaotic almost all the time where you would often get shot from multiple angles or multiple vertical levels, making playing offensively rather hard compared to holding a nice spot. Might be me being tired of shooters and gaming in general though.

This is embarassing to read. You are supposed to play tank and helicopter and jet when the situation is favorable. If you don't, you are not doing what you should be doing and you die. BF2 actually got combined arms more or less right, unlike almost any modern FPS. This disease is called CoD.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: BF4
« Reply #67 on: October 05, 2013, 07:33:10 pm »
0
Also I definitely think that bf1942 was more fun than bf2. BF2 was good but it didn't have the same epic feel. I played a great mod for bf1942 called forgotten hope that added a lot of units maps guns and realism to the game. There may still be people playing....

As I said before I played in a tourny for it for 5 years. FH2 on BF2 is still going and they have 200 player servers now.

What I dislike about Battlefield is the vehicles, which is half the game really. As someone who loves playing infantry I often find that you are seldomly equipped as a squad to be able to properly deal with a tank, enemy squads and enemy air vehicles. Being in a tank does give you a better position compared to the average infantryman, and as I didn't like playing in a tank much I was always on the receiving end of that better position. Often you feel like you just have no chance and it gets frustrating, switching class all the time only to be faced by your counter all the time. I played Battlefield 2 like 300 hours on infantry only mode on Strike at Karkand, which I really enjoyed back then. Played it again more recently and I was appalled at the shooting mechanics, hit detection and the entire system were pretty horrible. But 64 player matches with only infantry were pretty intense.

I bought Battlefield 3 but only played it 20 hours. I thought maps and gameplay were very chaotic almost all the time where you would often get shot from multiple angles or multiple vertical levels, making playing offensively rather hard compared to holding a nice spot. Might be me being tired of shooters and gaming in general though.

I would agree in pub play. A well manned vehicle can ruin your day as infantry, especially if your squad is shit or your vehicles are no where to be seen. But in organised play it's the vehicles that struggle (having been in infantry companies for most of my tourny play). It's usually about kit set ups in squads and your placement.

Even in BF3 with a couple of friends defending a flag as infantry a tank that roles onto one is dead fairly quickly.

On FH I used to love infantry only maps because I played exclusively as inf, but this was largely due to the fact that some vehicle maps were massive on scale and relied so much on tanks you left the armour/planes to the guys who knew how to handle them. The maps also seemed much bigger than their BF3 equivalents now. Now when I play maps like Metro though I really miss the old style battlefield maps and even the infantry maps like Berlin.

I wonder how console kiddies would cope with playing 1942/FH as infantry with no squad spawns or spawns other than flags. If you died it often meant a big trek back to your position but it made it that much more important to stay alive. Especially with FH realism mechanics where 1 rifle shot usually meant you were dead.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2013, 07:41:00 pm by Overdriven »

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #68 on: October 06, 2013, 04:10:33 am »
0
Yeah playing in a organised squad definitely completely changes the balance of the game. more than ever with the new lazer tag / rpg combo in bf4. always used to get kicked from servers when in squad in bf3 (one of my friends especially).

had a round in this bf4 beta where entire other team was a clan vs us pubs and they played so seriously, overwatching every street with all the vechicles, to say it was a one sided match would be a severe understatement. what a bunch of sadcunts tho really.

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: BF4
« Reply #69 on: October 06, 2013, 09:41:16 am »
0
I'm with you on this one, Titanfall I'm sure will be the new trendsetter for the FPS in the future years just like COD4:Modern Warfare was. In the next 2/3 years it will be all about future warfare, kinda looking forawrd to it. Will most likely purchase Titanfall.

I just watched the gameplay demo, yeah, I'll be picking it up even if it is EA.
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Grumpy_Nic

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1023
  • Infamy: 306
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Hermann_von_Krems
Re: BF4
« Reply #70 on: October 06, 2013, 11:17:51 am »
0
Fuck EA. Hate them

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: BF4
« Reply #71 on: October 06, 2013, 08:17:11 pm »
0
Fuck EA. Hate them

I hate them too, but watch that Titanfall demo video.

"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #72 on: October 06, 2013, 08:54:33 pm »
0
Titanfall is cool sure, but Unreal has been doing that and better since decades. It's technically not a lot of really original gameplay, even though that word may as well mean "not CoD" these days.

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BF4
« Reply #73 on: October 06, 2013, 09:33:36 pm »
+1
titanfall looks completely meh to me.

also why do you need a giant robot if in the future kicking people in the stomach is lethal.

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: BF4
« Reply #74 on: October 06, 2013, 10:10:43 pm »
+3
titanfall looks completely meh to me.

also why do you need a giant robot if in the future kicking people in the stomach is lethal.

If you think that looks meh you are already dead inside. An empty shell without a soul.
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login