Author Topic: cav: especially LoLlancers  (Read 8086 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Magikarp

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 130
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
  • Gotta splash em all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merciless
  • Game nicks: Magikarp ; Merciless_Charlemagne
  • IRC nick: Magikarp
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #75 on: May 01, 2011, 10:45:07 pm »
0
Magicarp please stop whining 24/7... a few posts to state your opinion is good, but right now, i just think you're making the devs want to nerf cav even more :D
That's the whole problem, I hear everyone speak on about how they dislike the cavalry nerf and how it was unjustified. But I am one of the only ones taking the time to defend our position. Like you.
Don't mind the fish.

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #76 on: May 01, 2011, 10:45:34 pm »
0
Magicarp please stop whining 24/7... a few posts to state your opinion is good, but right now, i just think you're making the devs want to nerf cav even more :D

Well, he has a point about the Arabian horse. Might wanna look into that.

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #77 on: May 01, 2011, 10:46:18 pm »
0
Well, he has a point about the Arabian horse. Might wanna look into that.

Agreed, tack on some horse nerfs for cav as well for the next hotfix patch.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #78 on: May 01, 2011, 10:48:09 pm »
0
Well, Sarranid horse only has manoeuvrability. Stinks at the rest.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Magikarp

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 130
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
  • Gotta splash em all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merciless
  • Game nicks: Magikarp ; Merciless_Charlemagne
  • IRC nick: Magikarp
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #79 on: May 01, 2011, 10:48:56 pm »
0
Well, Sarranid horse only has manoeuvrability. Stinks at the rest.
Keep thinkign like that if we aren't getting a heavy lance buff. I will enjoy using it.
Don't mind the fish.

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #80 on: May 01, 2011, 11:16:17 pm »
0
Well, Sarranid horse only has manoeuvrability. Stinks at the rest.

True. the thing goes down really fast, even more since the archery buff! But any decent cav player wont be dehorsed right at the beggining

anyway. I get your points magikarp. But i dont think its worth really the fight! I believe the wrong item got nerfed but the class is still very viable. I could say why, but right now i cant be bothered.

anyway, i'v done more posting on this forum then i ever thought i would. see you in game

Shogunate_The_Intolerant

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #81 on: May 01, 2011, 11:32:53 pm »
0
penalty with shield should have stayed.

Offline 22nd_King_Plazek

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 87
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #82 on: May 01, 2011, 11:39:04 pm »
0
Actually, after training the sword&board on the duel server a bit, jump slashers were the easiest people to kill.
A 2h who didn't jump at all and just knew he'd hit me first was impossible. Playing sword & board cav is perfectly viable on the battle server, support and backstab, the problem is just you have or had no advantage against a lancer at all, they can do all that just fine, and you must outmaneuver them completely to win a cav vs cav fight.

This is the exact point I keep making :)
Lancing cavalry hold all the cards when it comes to horse v horse  combat. They need to stop whining about how hard it is for them now and try out sword and horse against lancers. They also need to stop goin "WAGHGHGH cavalry nerf" because the lances got some much needed debuffs. It is not a cavalry nerf it is a lancer nerf and as a cavalryman I am happy with it and want more!





Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #83 on: May 01, 2011, 11:43:05 pm »
0
penalty with shield should have stayed.

This. That "penalty with shield" text was so epic!
Because you know, that's the only thing it added.

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #84 on: May 01, 2011, 11:45:52 pm »
0
so its my fault you dont release patch notes and so I have to go off player made ones? (Im presuming penalty with shield is still in then, thats excellent)
« Last Edit: May 01, 2011, 11:48:04 pm by Banok »

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #85 on: May 01, 2011, 11:47:50 pm »
0
so its my fault you release patch notes and so I have to go off player made ones? (Im presuming penalty with shield is still in then, thats excellent)

I guess he meant that it was just a trick message
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #86 on: May 01, 2011, 11:52:05 pm »
0
:S so penalty with shield never did anything? thats wierd cause I could have sworn it did. plus I remember you adding it to weapons to nerf them like staff.

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #87 on: May 01, 2011, 11:52:29 pm »
0
I mean that it did absolutely nothing (and it has nothing to do with our changelogs, it's hardcoded stuff).
We confirmed that just recently though, so it was removed.

Offline Gatsby

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 69
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Goffredo; Montfort
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #88 on: May 02, 2011, 12:57:23 am »
0
As i guessed now cav dominate the battle, easy coz nobody can take a pike in his inventory. Nice one.

Offline AgentQ

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 11
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: cav: especially LoLlancers
« Reply #89 on: May 02, 2011, 02:12:04 am »
0
WRONG.
TWO HAND + PIKE
1 HAND + SHIELD + PIKE

all inf can take one pike