Author Topic: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance  (Read 47327 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mongolista

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 162
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Quincy
  • Game nicks: Guardian_Bethrezen, Quincy_Mongo
  • IRC nick: Bethrezen
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #330 on: February 08, 2013, 06:35:40 pm »
+5
Every time I want to quickly check what block does each member belong to, I just check naduril's plus or minus at the top of the message :twisted:

http://youtu.be/po3jPq5LT0g
(click to show/hide)

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #331 on: February 08, 2013, 06:36:16 pm »
+1
I've been playing strat longer than almost anyone in this game. I was in the pre-pre-pre beta strat. Long before there was even a templar block.

I have no bone to pick with either side here, but when was this prepreprebeta strat? As far as I know the first characters to ever spawn on the Strat map were Growl and myself, for a set-up test siege.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #332 on: February 08, 2013, 07:04:03 pm »
0
I have no bone to pick with either side here, but when was this prepreprebeta strat? As far as I know the first characters to ever spawn on the Strat map were Growl and myself, for a set-up test siege.

Before they let everyone just click to join, you had to get a key to spawn.
I would assume at the same time as that. I just thought that you guys  bought gear and tested a battle, not that you actually spawned on the map.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #333 on: February 08, 2013, 09:41:07 pm »
0
(click to show/hide)
Full alliance members of CFA are atm, Brotherhood, CotgS, SoA, Wolves, other factions like like Agvenian Empire , Band of Foxes, Ercorcheur, Valkyria are under the protection of CFA and step by step when they grow will either decide to become full alliance members or will go venture of solo, as already done by Brotherhood who started as vassal and later met the requirments or BlackFists who ventured of and we still work together in some situations but are atm offically neutral to each other.
We do have one other faction ready making his next step to either full membership or going solo and also a new aspirant for vassalage(tutorship). Project "get more colors on the map" : status - ongoing

current war of CFA against Ottomans is so far only done with CFA ressources, Ottomans even achieved a "everlasting" NAP with Apostates for the cheap price of only 4 fiefs, while shortly before i was asked to attack Ottomans as for some reasons it would be the perfect time to do so. Well played Apostates. Getting something for nothing.
CFA stays out of the war in the South till Crusaders would really get into trouble, which seems not to have happened yet. Still as mentioned before, ShuHan are now seen as hostile, meaning ,don't show close to our parties or you will be attacked, difference to open warfare is, i don't send parties down to actively attack you or reinforce Crusaders.

--------------------------------------
to all the complains about being afk for weeks or not making war ...
it took us 13k troops and 2 fucking months to get back Slezkh castle,
and we are already again in another war. But I won't just send out our troops to die in vain, if we attack i intend to get something out of it. The down grinding of places like Uxcahl, we should safe us for the end and you all know why already. It needs like 2-3 times the troops which are shown inside. If tehy have enough active members they could put in there every day more or less like 800 fresh troops. That combined with 50% loot, makes it a meat grinder never seen before and you can only attack those places very well prepared and that takes a long time.

If you didn't notice f.e., villages this round often didn't get reinforced at all, troops just where pulled out into Castles, where then the people wait for an attack. But it is not espically the fault of Easter or Western Block but of the game mechanics that we don't see more and attractive battles but are either the defenders of castles and towns laughing our asses of or the attackers bashing their heads against the walls. So chill people and either wait for improvements in strat or more likely the next game.
BTW  has the questioned been asked if cRPG/strategus would be made available also as mod for M&B2, if not so would it?


...
Our downfall in Strat 3 had nothing to do with your "NA pride". It was plotted by an EU guy from an EU faction
erm  :oops:

... and mostly executed by Bashibazouks.
not really, just used as opportunity to start the conquest.
Former Desert Alliance was asked if we would have anything against it, and we just asked for the time it would happen, so we can be ready to make our own advances. Afterwards we paid Bashi for their conquest fiefs and they ventured of.

The NA opposition was at that time down to a single village.
...
true, but fully equipped and ready to counter attack any time. This is the Desert Alliance NA part we are talking about, no clue if the Northern NA guys really engaged against Fallen, i know FCC tried to bring reinforcements , due to upkeep problems that but was a small disaster i heard.

....
 the Wolves are just playing the fool with us
...
Not playing that part ^^, we got just included into a war with Ottomans by Apostates while they can sit back laughing their ars  off  :D well earned if i may include, becasue you really played me well there  :twisted:.

So i ment what i said, atm if alpha is not pressuring the matter, CFA won't come to their aid, we have our hands full with Ottomans and GO.


Lol @
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

broken logic as Bros are part of CFA and CFA declared war onto DRZ long ago and remember Slezkh Castle that meat grinding shit hole we took back from DRZ. Thanks for passwords anyhow.
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #334 on: February 08, 2013, 11:32:56 pm »
+6
It's meant as a joke Kinngrimm. Jesus christ relax will you
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #335 on: February 09, 2013, 08:34:37 am »
+2
It's meant as a joke Kinngrimm. Jesus christ relax will you
why don't people get that i get it ^^ jesus who?
dry humor anyone ... i am too old for this shit -_-
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future

Offline Segd

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 845
  • Infamy: 88
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #336 on: February 09, 2013, 10:29:17 am »
+5
i am too old for this shit -_-
http://c-rpg.net/?page=charretire  :twisted:
no more weapon rack's raping

Offline Harpag

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 914
  • Infamy: 263
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • jebać merców
    • View Profile
  • Faction: UIF
  • Game nicks: Harpag_the_Grey
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #337 on: February 09, 2013, 12:44:07 pm »
+15
i am too old for this shit -_-

Oh come on, need a little chill ... no one is too old for this shit  :)

Just look - you're a bloody star and no one is faster than you  :)


A classic recording from one of our battles:

- Hey guys, someone is behind...
- hey kinngrimm is behind our weaponrack!
- ...wtf wake up and kill kinngrimm...
- what?
- wake up and kill kinngrimm now... faster!
-kill kinngrimm...
-killkinngrimm... killkinngrimmkillkinngrimm...
- kurwa! just killgrimm!
-arrghghrrr... too late!
- Ok... bravo.. now take one construction site and find someone with construction materials and build new weaponrack you noobass...
 - and be ready for next time... don't sleep, killgrimm never sleep!


Strategus without killgrimm sucks  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #338 on: February 09, 2013, 01:44:53 pm »
0
why don't people get that i get it ^^ jesus who?
dry humor anyone ... i am too old for this shit -_-

Oh? Sorry, I didn't even read your post, but "broken logic" or something. Stop making wall of texts and I'll start reading :P
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #339 on: February 09, 2013, 04:03:30 pm »
+3
why don't people get that i get it

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #340 on: February 09, 2013, 07:54:35 pm »
+5
love you guys, you just made my day  :D


 ... see this is what i really want more often, lighten up.

i know i come along sometimes like a german with a stick up his ars ^^ and my/our humor may be borderline thin to neglectable but hey if you look close enough ;) bagge ... there is still a sent of it in the air.

all fun and games, even if we bite our teeth into the keyboard because we just got headshotted by bagge on close up, raped by teeth's pike, smashed by Vovka swinging a Maul(go awaaaay) or by another of the great players, without enemies this game would just be boring, not that the long waiting periods *yawn* wouldn't do that enough till something gets done here, the more exiting it is when you actually see moving dots *omg* did we do that ... no shit we are moving dots on the map ... in a formation ... coool  8-)
And when then the fighting heats up and our senses are blurred by the massive battles, we go back onto the forum and rooaaar out our frustration or joy, hasn't that then been a good strategus day  :lol:

(read the following if you don't mind text wall with even less coherent thought process)
(click to show/hide)

overall very enjoyable strat sofar  :twisted:
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #341 on: February 09, 2013, 08:48:34 pm »
+1
"mmm no you are not Jesus, no not Moses, btw Woods slow you down but they can also be usefull". Hahaha that really cracked me up, I can relate to that :wink:

You need to teach some young padawan so he can help you out in Strategus mate 8-)
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #342 on: February 09, 2013, 08:50:31 pm »
0
Strategus without killgrimm sucks  :mrgreen:

QFT!
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #343 on: February 10, 2013, 12:23:26 am »
+4
original message 2 days back

(click to show/hide)


answer to it afterwards
(click to show/hide)

EDIT:slightly modified for paranoia aka security reasons ^^
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« Reply #344 on: February 10, 2013, 09:39:20 am »
+3
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login