Yeah, honestly, I'm trying to hold back my shitposts until this stuff hits NA. People are saying horses below Destrier(?) no longer knock players down. People agree that cav is gross I guess, but I'm one of those gay realism > balance guys. I'd assume any horse with below 120hp, because that would put destrier in line with "heavy cav," having as much as the War horse.
I wouldn't argue as passionately as some others - I'm glad you're putting thought into countering cav. I thought it was appropriate, but you see some of the best cav players argue against their own playstyle. BADPLAYER, bless his heart, was boycotting his own class a month ago.
I think 80-100% max speed should still floor a player on the lighter horses. My bias stems from carrying an anti-cav polearm, but I know how frustrating it is to be knocked down as a 100% aware shielder by a just-past-trotting arabian. When I think 'nerf cav', heavy horses come to mind, but their charge should be more devastating, and that was only portrayed through bump damage before. I agree there should be a difference between light and heavy bumps. Something more punishing than the 1-second "Argh" stun as a rouncey plows into you full speed, but less punishing than being completely floored by an Arabian Warhorse weaving through a melee fight at half speed. Again, just thoughts.