Author Topic: Native vs cRPG  (Read 9535 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieChan

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Crève salope / Master of left spam
    • View Profile
    • CRPG PATCH!
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_BD_JackieChan
  • IRC nick: JackieChan
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #75 on: December 02, 2012, 04:33:16 pm »
+2
No no, not these shitty little 5 vs 5 fights in boxes. Actual clan battles with like 10 per side and on a map where maneuvering is possible.
During the Shogunate days, beeing a 1h Shielder was forbiden in the clan(as many other things), and using a shield in battle mod to. We only used the Old board shield(0 requirement at that time) during clan battles to protect against ranged.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Wهاهاهاهاهاهاهاهاهاه

Offline Shemaforash

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 533
  • Infamy: 169
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Shemaforash
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #76 on: December 02, 2012, 04:40:26 pm »
+3
You guys need to stop making these threads, it's been proven long ago that competitive play belongs in native while public play belongs in cRPG.

You can whine how much you want but that's still going to be a fact and if there's need for proof on that point... Native, everyone has the same stats.
You should be punished for having a shitty attitude.

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #77 on: December 02, 2012, 05:01:31 pm »
+3
Oberyn, you are talking out of your ass, Ujin wouldnt let me in the clan till i dropped the shield

Offline Adamar

  • He who doesn't want to be labelled
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 422
  • Infamy: 319
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #78 on: December 02, 2012, 05:03:56 pm »
0
You guys need to stop making these threads, it's been proven long ago that competitive play belongs in native while public play belongs in cRPG.

You can whine how much you want but that's still going to be a fact and if there's need for proof on that point... Native, everyone has the same stats.

Quite right. Crpg is meant for developing your own char. I was surprised at the lack of melee skill from players when I first logged in here.

Offline Shemaforash

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 533
  • Infamy: 169
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Shemaforash
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #79 on: December 02, 2012, 05:09:37 pm »
+4
That's never what I said, I said that Native is for competitive play, cRPG isn't but has more fun public play. Which is why I play cRPG.
You should be punished for having a shitty attitude.

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #80 on: December 02, 2012, 05:15:27 pm »
+4
Shemaforash is right, of course native is better for competitive play as there are no looms or levels or builds, it's silly to argue that c-rpg is more competitive when everyone are far from on equal ground.

And no, I prefer c-rpg over native, it's faster and a lot of bad mechanics have been made slightly less lame.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.

Offline Corsair831

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1168
  • Infamy: 616
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #81 on: December 02, 2012, 06:20:30 pm »
0
exactly what i said all along, crpg = publol's, native = competetive
I 10/10'd cRPG on moddb.com!

Do your bit for our community and write a 10/10 review for cRPG on http://www.moddb.com/mods/crpg !

Offline H4rdn3ssKill3r

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 107
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Crummy Wizard
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: naaaaaaaaaah
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #82 on: December 02, 2012, 06:43:28 pm »
0
Some bullshit
Yeahhhh no.
He never said it was crap, he said what was true.
Native is for competive, which is why when you say "We are the best team in C-RPG" nobody gives two flying fucknuggets while if you're the best in native everybody knows you.
f8uasdlöadk blablablababa lbalba
^ Analogy of discussions on forums.

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #83 on: December 02, 2012, 06:45:47 pm »
+2
unless you only play crpg :P i dont know or care whos the best native clan :D
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Shemaforash

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 533
  • Infamy: 169
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Shemaforash
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #84 on: December 02, 2012, 06:49:40 pm »
0
unless you only play crpg :P i dont know or care whos the best native clan :D

Or people who simply don't give a crap about who's the best competitive clan, competitive play is the only thing that keeps me playing.
You should be punished for having a shitty attitude.

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #85 on: December 02, 2012, 06:59:09 pm »
0
ive never been in an active native clan so its crpg that keeps me going :D
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #86 on: December 02, 2012, 07:40:22 pm »
+2
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 07:13:38 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #87 on: December 02, 2012, 07:58:05 pm »
+3
You guys need to stop making these threads, it's been proven long ago that competitive play belongs in native while public play belongs in cRPG.

It's been also "proven" long ago that cRPG is 527% better than Native, if you know what I mean.

Offline Falka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1257
  • Infamy: 423
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #88 on: December 02, 2012, 08:06:44 pm »
+1
It's been also "proven" long ago that cRPG is 527% better than Native, if you know what I mean.
You'll have to excuse me, my dear cmp, but let's be precise. It's 526%, not 527%.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline autobus

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 598
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bartering Brigade "Black Tea"
  • Game nicks: Autobus, Shushu, Samodur
  • IRC nick: Autobus
Re: Native vs cRPG
« Reply #89 on: December 02, 2012, 08:11:18 pm »
+1
I'd love to see someone saying that checkers are way more competitive than chess because all the figures in checkers are equal while chess are all about this stupid variety that dumbs up the game.