Author Topic: The Annexation of Ismirala  (Read 17411 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #135 on: September 30, 2012, 09:38:07 pm »
-1
NO MORE GOATS!!!!!!  :evil:
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #136 on: September 30, 2012, 09:44:38 pm »
0
How about King Werfried? He has declared war on you and everyone else so he's perfectly neutral.
Nah, I was thinking of myself, since I'm completely neutral. It's true if I write it in a post. Just ask Harafat!

(click to show/hide)
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #137 on: September 30, 2012, 09:48:00 pm »
+3
Also, I was thinking of someone completely neutral. To everyone. Ever. I don't think Antarians is in strat this round so maybe Randomdude? Someone like that.
Why are you claiming king Werfried isn't neutral? We'll be at war with everyone eventually due to our claim being the entire EU strat map and we have me as a diplomat so we aren't exactly making any allies.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #138 on: October 01, 2012, 12:19:00 am »
-6
Andswaru pretending Nords weren't going to kowtow and suck UIF dick anyways, so precious. Hey, why don't you threaten that your entire clan will post an endless stream of funny gifs in your clan thread unless your demands are met? 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #139 on: October 01, 2012, 02:53:35 am »
+3
Let us see what happens at ismirala castle.

Have fun all!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline karasu

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1751
  • Infamy: 316
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • D̶͎̳͒́͗͋ẹ͕̲̠̳̄̃͂ͤ͑ͮṃ̮͎̗̦̏̿͊ͤi̥̪̼͕ͦ̀̊̐ȗ̘rͩ͋̅̊gͭ̿̋
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #140 on: October 01, 2012, 03:11:33 am »
+1
   I like how most of the comments here are from people which have nothing to do with the Thread Subject, and whom moral values have been completely messed up from the start.  :rolleyes:

Offline Harafat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Harafat_HRE
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #141 on: October 01, 2012, 03:19:26 am »
0
Nah, I was thinking of myself, since I'm completely neutral. It's true if I write it in a post. Just ask Harafat!

(click to show/hide)

How could i be mad at a loveable toon like yourself? You have humor, style, and you are good looking! My marriage request must have been blocked by evil republican chadz!

I stick to my point, my post IS neutral, nowhere do i take sides in it. i tried to make the best resumé given information provided by both sides and forums. But ye, gief randomdude!
« Last Edit: October 01, 2012, 03:31:14 am by Harafat »

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #142 on: October 01, 2012, 03:26:35 am »
-2
How could i be mad at a loveable toon like yourself? You have humor, style, and you are good looking! My marriage request must have been blocked by evil republican chadz!

I stick to my point, my post IS neutral, nowhere do i take sides in it. i tried to make the best resumé given information provided by both sides and forums. But ye, gief randomdude! And have some selfrespect, gag thovex!

ZzZzZz... You want me to stop, I'll stop if you get off my back now, 3rd post with the same stuff...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Harafat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Harafat_HRE
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #143 on: October 01, 2012, 03:29:58 am »
+2
ZzZzZz... You want me to stop, I'll stop if you get off my back now, 3rd post with the same stuff...


ok, but do stop. Even modified my post to show good intentions

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #144 on: October 01, 2012, 03:31:43 am »
+2


ok, but do stop.

Lego cRPG it is.

It's fine, I'll manage to keep calm because there is obviously something wrong with some people here so I'll just go play cRPG and finish the "wars" there.
Also, you are in Mercs since a month and have always had the biggest mouth. :wink:

But toodles! Let's fight in Strat battles instead.

Yes, which is why I said I'll stop discussing because everyone else is always right and the opposite side is always wrong.

I could go after all these discussions till it stops itself but you'd just keep on going, so xoxo.  :)

ZzZzZz... You want me to stop, I'll stop if you get off my back now, 3rd post with the same stuff...

Was 2 pages ago...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #145 on: October 01, 2012, 04:03:50 am »
+5
Funny how people take this so personal and cry about our actions, their actions bla bla bla. Strategus is supposed to be fun, not a forever grind fest. At least we will have some battles now, which is the main part of Strategus

I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #146 on: October 01, 2012, 04:06:17 am »
+1
Yes bagge. Was an awesome fun battle.

We will enjoy victory for a bit, gg.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Cepeshi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 467
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
  • Relax, it is just a life...
    • View Profile
    • Wanna work with me? Ping for more info!
  • Faction: Deserters
  • Game nicks: Fapulena, Useless
  • IRC nick: Cepeshi
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #147 on: October 01, 2012, 04:09:39 am »
+1
awesome fight everyone involved, lots of fun and exp, both sides somewhat satisfied i hope :) thanks for such epic siege


also bagge, i think i ate two or three arrows of yours  8-)

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #148 on: October 01, 2012, 04:17:02 am »
0
I just wish you guys would stop hiding so much behind the battlements and shields, so I could shoot more of you :(

At least your archers liked to poke your heads out :D
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #149 on: October 01, 2012, 04:18:18 am »
+5
Good battle, was fun :)
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.