Author Topic: The Annexation of Ismirala  (Read 17408 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Cicero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 418
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • scourge of god
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: BashiBazouks_Cicero
  • IRC nick: Cicero
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #120 on: September 30, 2012, 06:43:57 pm »
0
Mercs started again lol

One question mercs ;

Nords attacked crusader alliance as your speech and other stuff why the fuck you are whinning for ?

I mean there is a problem here

1) If nords attacked mercs ; nap is not gonna work
2)If nords attacked crusaders ; mercs gtfo

Which one ?

Offline Lizard_man

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 717
  • Infamy: 153
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Lizard_man, Jinmenju
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #121 on: September 30, 2012, 06:50:29 pm »
+4
Either way it's got fuck all to do with you. So, "gtfo" :|
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Harpag

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 914
  • Infamy: 263
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • jebać merców
    • View Profile
  • Faction: UIF
  • Game nicks: Harpag_the_Grey
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #122 on: September 30, 2012, 07:07:08 pm »
+12
I have some experience in dealing with these factions, so I allow myself to sophisticated diplomatic advice  :wink:
(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Bjord

  • Amateur heretic
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1328
  • Infamy: 1109
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • salty turks
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #123 on: September 30, 2012, 07:20:07 pm »
+1
:)

Awesome start for Strat 4 EU! See you all in the battlefield.
When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back.

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #124 on: September 30, 2012, 07:42:01 pm »
+6
I have some experience in dealing with these factions, so I allow myself to sophisticated diplomatic advice  :wink:
(click to show/hide)

You mean :

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline the real god emperor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1630
  • Infamy: 348
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • Et tu, Brute?
    • View Profile
    • Click for gifts
  • Faction: Rome
  • Game nicks: Captain_Sweden
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #125 on: September 30, 2012, 07:48:46 pm »
-2


(click to show/hide)

Offline Plavor

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 83
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Yoshis are dragons, not dinos!!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Plavor
  • IRC nick: Plavor
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #126 on: September 30, 2012, 08:30:48 pm »
+2
After reading all the posts, my opinion is :

Please stop this drama! Templars and Mercs had made a deal and Nords made a reaction.
Both sides still disagree on the reasons, but at the moment, all of you are trying to blame one side.

Seriously, you are even arguing with stuff that doesn't belong to this "deal" for example that nords have UIF support and aren't as neutral as they tried to.

IMO, you ( all factions ) should clearly state what they want and what not if they made any deals.
In addition, the only factions that should actually discuss this are Mercs,Nords and Templars but I haven't read a single answer of the Templars yet.

Nobody is "neutral" as you state to be.  If you have ever played cRPG and/or read stuff in the forum,. you would create an opinion about certain clans, happenings and so on, so basically
only people who haven't made any experiences about cRPG madeness are truely neutral




Offline Plavor

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 83
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Yoshis are dragons, not dinos!!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Plavor
  • IRC nick: Plavor
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #127 on: September 30, 2012, 08:31:48 pm »
0
After reading all the posts, my opinion is :

Please stop this drama! Templars and Mercs had made a deal and Nords made a reaction.
Both sides still disagree on the reasons, but at the moment, all of you are trying to blame one side.

Seriously, you are even arguing with stuff that doesn't belong to this "deal" for example that nords have UIF support and aren't as neutral as they tried to.

IMO, you ( all factions ) should clearly state what you want and what not if you make any deals in the future.
In addition, the only factions that should actually discuss this are Mercs,Nords and Templars.

Nobody is as "neutral" as you state to be.  If you have ever played cRPG and/or read stuff in the forum, you would create an opinion about certain clans, happenings and so on, which may influence your point of view.
So basically only people who haven't made any experiences about cRPG madeness are truely neutral.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 08:35:18 pm by Plavor »

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #128 on: September 30, 2012, 08:36:40 pm »
+1
I haven't read a single answer of the Templars yet.

My 'answer'

(click to show/hide)

And discussion about UIF is relevant to this topic as it was part of the negotiations.
Turtles

Offline Plavor

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 83
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Yoshis are dragons, not dinos!!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Plavor
  • IRC nick: Plavor
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #129 on: September 30, 2012, 08:38:08 pm »
0
Sry Casimir, I changed my post because I forgot that you are a templar :P

Offline the real god emperor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1630
  • Infamy: 348
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • Et tu, Brute?
    • View Profile
    • Click for gifts
  • Faction: Rome
  • Game nicks: Captain_Sweden
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #130 on: September 30, 2012, 08:38:15 pm »
-2
Real Madrid - Atletico Madrid? Im on the side of Madrid.

Offline Bjord

  • Amateur heretic
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1328
  • Infamy: 1109
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • salty turks
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #131 on: September 30, 2012, 08:47:02 pm »
0
My 'answer'

(click to show/hide)

And discussion about UIF is relevant to this topic as it was part of the negotiations.

He also missed the part where there was a violation of agreement, i.e hostile activity during the cool down period after the NAP was cancelled.
When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back.

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #132 on: September 30, 2012, 09:02:05 pm »
0
I think my offer to hold Ismirala as an independant lord is the best solution.  As everyone loves me.
Actually a good idea. Let's get a randomer to hold it. Someone not in favour of Nordmen nor Merc/Templar/Fallen/HRE/
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #133 on: September 30, 2012, 09:11:50 pm »
0
War is war - dont argue about it!

(or battle is battle, whatever...)
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #134 on: September 30, 2012, 09:34:41 pm »
-2
Actually a good idea. Let's get a randomer to hold it. Someone not in favour of Nordmen nor Merc/Templar/Fallen/HRE/
How about King Werfried? He has declared war on you and everyone else so he's perfectly neutral.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.