Author Topic: The Annexation of Ismirala  (Read 17406 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #75 on: September 30, 2012, 03:43:11 pm »
0
Andswaru to his place in Strat History as "The New Kinngrimm".  Pretty impressive for a guy who only stepped up to power 2 weeks ago  :mrgreen:

Stop the bullshit Tomas and gtfo. Go back to your precious loluation and give Wiltzu a hug instead
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline Jacko

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 99
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Mappers Guild
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fffnanguard!
  • Game nicks: Jacko
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #76 on: September 30, 2012, 03:50:12 pm »
+5
My epeen is under attack, quick to the accusation catapult!

This is the silliest reason yet to go to war in strat, but whatever. I for one welcome the opportunity for some good battles!
Monkeys!

Offline Tomas

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 718
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • Fallen Brigade Website
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Tomas
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #77 on: September 30, 2012, 03:50:55 pm »
+2
Tomas it was you, but before we start back and fowarding lets just agree to disagree on that point.

Lol - whether it was me or rogue is irrelevant but why would either of us lie about this?  What would it achieve?  Surely it is is much more likely that you simply misunderstood something that we may or may not have explained badly.

EDIT: In fact I can alter just 2 bits in your quote to make it factually correct, which supports the "misunderstanding" theory imo rather than the "I am an outright liar attempting to deceive all who cross my path in every way conceivable" theory :D

"fief ownership name colour change bug that lasts takes upto several hours"
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 04:16:24 pm by Tomas »

Offline Blueberry Muffin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 749
  • Infamy: 119
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #78 on: September 30, 2012, 04:22:51 pm »
+5
Quote
Andswaru: just saw the nighttime.
Andswaru: If you dont change it, or give us the castle, were gonna declare for the UIF.
Andswaru: You got 1 hour.

Quote
Andswaru: just saw the nighttime.
Andswaru: If you dont change it, or give us the castle, were gonna declare for the UIF.
Andswaru: You got 1 hour.

Quote
Andswaru: just saw the nighttime.
Andswaru: If you dont change it, or give us the castle, were gonna declare for the UIF.
Andswaru: You got 1 hour.
Quote

Andswaru: just saw the nighttime.
Andswaru: If you dont change it, or give us the castle, were gonna declare for the UIF.
Andswaru: You got 1 hour.


To quote cooties, 'classy that'.


Tyr and I have tried our very best on friendly relations with you, because we like many of your members, even if okin and a few others are somewhat unsavoury. This is where we are at now, please dont start shitting around about who has the moral highground, because you dont really have it.

Anyways, lets have some battles.
Lizard_Man: Fuck all that! Rather buy me 4 cans of Stella..
Cymro: Wife beater stella
Lizard_Man: It'll get ya drunk! You'll be fucking fat girls in no time! You might even fight a nigga or two! Mmmm-mmm, bitch!

Offline DaveUKR

  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 1456
  • Infamy: 242
  • cRPG Player
  • Small rain lays great dust
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #79 on: September 30, 2012, 04:23:03 pm »
-2
Secondly if Dave is your Diplomat then may the lord have mercy on you. The man is a liability of the highest level, he came on TS and made an ass out of himself by repeatedly talking over others and claiming to know all the facts when all the previous dealings Nords had had were with Tyr or Muffin. That was the reason why he was kicked. He then spent over an hour in our IRC channel asking questions which we answered reasonably and honestly (due to the fact he cant talk over others in IRC so we could actually communicate with him successfully).

That once again proves who you are.
First, I came to your TS with the full knowledge of what was going on, I knew each of your conversations with our leaders, I probably knew even something more.
Second, you were trying to avoid conversation with anybody of Mercs, ignoring Tyr and sitting in hidden room in TS. If not Bagge, who grabbed me into the channel, I would wait way more in your TS.
Third, you kept mumbling that you don't get my point and asked to explain what I want over and over, making fool of yourself and saying like "man, I don't get what you're talking about, explain your point". I told you exactly what Nocti wrote in his previous post.
(click to show/hide)
Fourth, you kept giving me bullshit in TS. Don't you remember? "We're not UIF and we're even fighting against UIF! We fought against Druzhina a couple of times, there were 15 Nords in the last battle against Druzhina. Even Vovka came to our TS being mad." which was actually a battle against clan called Vendetta, made of Ukrainians and Russians mostly (Vargrs = former Greys), where only 7 Nords were accepted and ended with mediocre score.
Fifth, just copy the logs of IRC where I was asking questions for 1 hour. You have enough of members who can have those logs. After something like 15-20min of discussions I went AFK and then left the IRC server. Because besides "honest" replies I also got a lot of stupid trolling of your members.


Sixth, and the most important:
You already had your plans and ready army when you were talking to me. Also Cooties acted like: everything is fine, don't worry, I'll talk to my members tomorrow and I'll inform you if enemy (UIF) army comes for you through our territories.

So to sum up, all your honest truth was just a part of truth. When we asked direct questions you said "I don't know, I don't decide, I'll ask members", you didn't lied us about what you will do, but you lied that you didn't know what you're going to do. And you could always say something like "we're not going to attack you" actually meaning that you're not going to attack us at this current second but a second later you will be going to do that. That's just a sophisticated lie. If you're so honest and smart you could at least bring a better reason to break all relations than "we had no progress in relations with you" and make a thread that you're attacking Ismirala territory not when you army is standing at the walls of the castle.

I'm out of this thread. I don't want to argue with you, Andswaru, because you'll bring me down to your level and beat me there with your experience, still saying that you don't get my point and need explanation. Have a good day, sir!

Offline Cepeshi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 467
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
  • Relax, it is just a life...
    • View Profile
    • Wanna work with me? Ping for more info!
  • Faction: Deserters
  • Game nicks: Fapulena, Useless
  • IRC nick: Cepeshi
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #80 on: September 30, 2012, 04:31:55 pm »
+1
BATTLES, i like! STRAT IS ALIVE  :twisted:

Offline Harafat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Harafat_HRE
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #81 on: September 30, 2012, 04:33:05 pm »
+3
Allow me to kill this thread as a neutral observer, not as memebr of the coalition.

If Templars and Mercs made this deal to protect the fief from an incoming Nord invasion, thus using the Templar-Nord-NAP, then that's a very sly move but unfortunately a legit one. Granted, borderline legit, but still legit.
Secondly, untill actual hard proof of this intention is given, you can only be guessing about their intent. In a RL court this argument would be wiped off the table instantly.

What the Nords SHOULD have done when they saw the swap, was contact the Templars, cancel the NAP, and attack when the cooldown was over. Now you just acted on gut and emotions, where diplomacy is a thing not to be take lightly imo, so its better to take 3 breaths and then act. So basicly you broke the NAP.

Neither side is right in this whole debate, nobody can claim moral highground here, both sides made dick-moves. The fact is however, Templars-Mercs made a legit move, Nords didnt.

The situation is what it is, can we deal with it now instead of whining about it?

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #82 on: September 30, 2012, 04:33:52 pm »
-2

To quote cooties, 'classy that'.


Tyr and I have tried our very best on friendly relations with you, because we like many of your members, even if okin and a few others are somewhat unsavoury. This is where we are at now, please dont start shitting around about who has the moral highground, because you dont really have it.

Anyways, lets have some battles.

Well at 3am  I need Russians and Poles, and to secure the roster at that "time" that you chose to fight a big battle, I need to make the alliance happen. Im preety sure thats a logical consequece, instead of a limited war of local gains, we are now forced to declare for the UIF to secure our roster. No problem for us, or for the UIF, a bigger problem for the other side i guess.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Tyr_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 445
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player
  • Suum cuique
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tyr; Merc_Nemo; Caesar_Salad
  • IRC nick: Tyr_
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #83 on: September 30, 2012, 04:40:24 pm »
+1
Well at 3am  I need Russians and Poles, and to secure the roster at that "time" that you chose to fight a big battle, I need to make the alliance happen. Im preety sure thats a logical consequece, instead of a limited war of local gains, we are now forced to declare for the UIF to secure our roster. No problem for us, or for the UIF, a bigger problem for the other side i guess.

Andswaru, theres one simple reason for this battle time: Its bad for us, but even worse for the rest of UIF since most of them are from eastern europe. If you wouldve been on you own there would be no problem with another battle time. But since we knew youre with UIF again it was obvious for us that we need to set a nighttime which is bad for them, although most of our members do not like this battle time either.

Edit: Cooties, i give you one reason why we traded it to the templars although we need to secure our border with the castle: We trust them, i rather see them holding our border than you, and your actions proved me right that you neither are neutral nor can be considered trustworthy. And yes, it was you who told me that you have no further interest in this castle, therefore we never considered it to be your claim so ive seen no need to inform you about any deals we make with other factions
Also about the "not fighting in block". I brought a very reasonable deal to you which would make both, Nordmen and Mercenaries independet, but you refused it.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 04:46:42 pm by Tyr_ »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mike_of_Kingswell

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 258
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
  • If a guy looks dangerous he probably is.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell
  • IRC nick: MikeOfKingswell
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #84 on: September 30, 2012, 04:44:16 pm »
+1
we are now forced to declare for the UIF to secure our roster. No problem for us, or for the UIF, a bigger problem for the other side i guess.

Now?
Its not as if you wouldnt have merced for DRZ, Grey Order and Occitan all this time in strategus?
Oh wait: YOU DID. In all more or less big battles so far.
But its just NOW you declare for UIF...I see what you did there ;)

And even last night at 3am (german time) on the occitan battle 4 nords showed up on their roster.
So that time cant be THAT inconvenient for you.
In memory of Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell, member of The Coalition of Fallen and HRE, ruler of Ismirala Castle
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #85 on: September 30, 2012, 04:46:59 pm »
0
Allow me to kill this thread as a neutral observer, not as memebr of the coalition.

If Templars and Mercs made this deal to protect the fief from an incoming Nord invasion, thus using the Templar-Nord-NAP, then that's a very sly move but unfortunately a legit one. Granted, borderline legit, but still legit.
Secondly, untill actual hard proof of this intention is given, you can only be guessing about their intent. In a RL court this argument would be wiped off the table instantly.

What the Nords SHOULD have done when they saw the swap, was contact the Templars, cancel the NAP, and attack when the cooldown was over. Now you just acted on gut and emotions, where diplomacy is a thing not to be take lightly imo, so its better to take 3 breaths and then act. So basicly you broke the NAP.

Neither side is right in this whole debate, nobody can claim moral highground here, both sides made dick-moves. The fact is however, Templars-Mercs made a legit move, Nords didnt.

The situation is what it is, can we deal with it now instead of whining about it?

Honestly I can't read any of this bullshit "As neutral observer" - Said by a HRE member.

Now?
Its not as if you wouldnt have merced for DRZ, Grey Order and Occitan all this time in strategus?
Oh wait: YOU DID. In all more or less big battles so far.
But its just NOW you declare for UIF...I see what you did there ;)

And even last night at 3am (german time) on the occitan battle 4 nords showed up on their roster.
So that time cant be THAT inconvenient for you.

We have 80 fucking members, 4 nords out of 80 that can play at these times?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mike_of_Kingswell

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 258
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
  • If a guy looks dangerous he probably is.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell
  • IRC nick: MikeOfKingswell
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #86 on: September 30, 2012, 04:49:29 pm »
+1
Thovex please read the post i directed to you (above) again ;) Thanks a lot!
here it is again to make it more easy for you:
(click to show/hide)
In memory of Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell, member of The Coalition of Fallen and HRE, ruler of Ismirala Castle
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Harafat

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Harafat_HRE
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #87 on: September 30, 2012, 04:50:18 pm »
+5
Honestly I can't read any of this bullshit "As neutral observer" - Said by a HRE member.

Ah yes, Nords, can you plz gag this guy? My vessel filled to the brim with respect for the Nords keeps getting emptier every time this troll gets his say. And he gets about 50% of all your says. Shouldn't let a 16 year old with hormones bouncing in all directions be the spokesperson for your clan.

And read it, it is neutral.

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #88 on: September 30, 2012, 04:52:25 pm »
+2
we are now forced to declare for the UIF to secure our roster. No problem for us, or for the UIF, a bigger problem for the other side i guess.

You weren't forced for anything, most of the people as I remember we were very friendly to you, too friendly even. Well if you decide to deny everything you said, then build an army, march against people who had no hostile intentions against you, even offered you more solutions after everything, but insulting them, doing nothing to prevent war....you weren't forced for anything.
Its a choice.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Braeden

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 420
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • I hear the sound of drums
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Acre?
  • Game nicks: Braeden_Sanguine
  • IRC nick: Braeden
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #89 on: September 30, 2012, 04:52:35 pm »
+3