Author Topic: Fixed collision meshes (Read 3929 times)

Gravoth_iii · « **Reply #30 on:** August 07, 2012, 02:09:50 pm »

This is awesome, could you try to fix some buildings, too? Some of the corners stretch out really far on the desert themed houses, like i try to throw something but it gets stuck in the air like 30cm from the actual corner :/

DaveUKR · « **Reply #31 on:** August 07, 2012, 02:10:56 pm »

Quote from: Meow on August 07, 2012, 01:47:15 pm

So that part of my post was wrong, now answer the rest of it instead of ignoring it?
How much testing did you do?

If you think that this will kill low-end CPU machines - go and check it by yourself. I don't have old CPU to test it. About foliage. It got removed only in the Pine to have less faces since nobody shoots through it (too high and you can't see through it)

Quote from: Ozin on August 07, 2012, 01:45:39 pm

I'm talking about collision meshes. The server doesn't need to render the normal meshes, only calculate collisions. Thus, keeping the collision meshes as low as possible is important. If some native tree collision meshes are bad for performance, it shouldn't be used as an excuse.

Oh God, I'm talking about it too, I'm not that stupid. Those faces are from collision meshes ofc!

Meow · « **Reply #32 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:08:20 pm »

Well, sure can't be added without proper testing on a dedicated server.

Can't tell if performance changed with the new dedicated server software but that's not available to anyone at the moment anyway.
You can go ahead and ask a clan to use those on their training server or something then get people on it to test if the performance changes.
As in ask the server op if the cpu load is different from when the native collision objects were used with the same amount of players.
Try this on tree heavy maps.

DaveUKR · « **Reply #33 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:19:36 pm »

Quote from: Meow on August 07, 2012, 03:08:20 pm

Well, sure can't be added without proper testing on a dedicated server.

Can't tell if performance changed with the new dedicated server software but that's not available to anyone at the moment anyway.
You can go ahead and ask a clan to use those on their training server or something then get people on it to test if the performance changes.
As in ask the server op if the cpu load is different from when the native collision objects were used with the same amount of players.
Try this on tree heavy maps.

why should I do this? Those trees are the same as others, they don't use more faces than other trees, they use more than their previous collision mesh (which was fucked up).

Meow · « **Reply #34 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:22:17 pm »

K, then I'm out of this thread.

Laters.

DaveUKR · « **Reply #35 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:26:32 pm »

Quote from: Meow on August 07, 2012, 03:22:17 pm

K, then I'm out of this thread.

Laters.

Alright, I'll optimize them so you won't have any excuse not to add them.

Ozin · « **Reply #36 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:34:02 pm »

Don't misunderstand us Dave, I'd like to add them. Just thought it would be nice to optimize them while you're at it. And sorry about being mistaken about the other trees, I'm using my phone so I couldn't check the brfs.

The new portcullis should be fun

DaveUKR · « **Reply #37 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:51:32 pm »

Quote from: Ozin on August 07, 2012, 03:34:02 pm

Don't misunderstand us Dave, I'd like to add them. Just thought it would be nice to optimize them while you're at it. And sorry about being mistaken about the other trees, I'm using my phone so I couldn't check the brfs.

The new portcullis should be fun

No problem, I'll try my best.

Do you want me to do collision meshes for foliants? I think nobody shoots that high and arrows sticking in leaves would look stupid.

Is this okay for you? 78 faces -> 44 faces

(click to show/hide)

Ozin · « **Reply #38 on:** August 07, 2012, 03:54:24 pm »

Yeah, that looks a lot more reasonable.

DaveUKR · « **Reply #39 on:** August 07, 2012, 04:13:11 pm »

Quote from: Ozin on August 07, 2012, 03:54:24 pm

Yeah, that looks a lot more reasonable.

alright, i'll optimize it as well as I can. Will try it to make so it won't affect on the accuracy of these collision meshes.

DaveUKR · « **Reply #40 on:** August 07, 2012, 11:42:09 pm »

Name:	Original	Edited	Optimized
bo_snowy_pine_2	22	24	24
bo_portcullis_a	8	154	153
bo_tree_e_1	10	60	10
bo_tree_e_2	13	70	12
bo_tree_e_3	10	70	19
bo_palm_a	28	78	44
bo_tree_a1	34	23	23

bo_snowy_pine_2

(click to show/hide)

bo_tree_e_1

(click to show/hide)

bo_tree_e_2

(click to show/hide)

bo_tree_e_3

(click to show/hide)

bo_palm_a

(click to show/hide)

http://www.filedropper.com/treesdoor

Bjord · « **Reply #41 on:** August 07, 2012, 11:43:00 pm »

Nice, Dave.

zagibu · « **Reply #42 on:** August 08, 2012, 10:19:08 pm »

I don't think the polycounts of the collision meshes matter that much, because if the game developer was not a complete retard, he will first check regular AABB overlap before the detailed collision mesh is even used.

A test should be quite easy though, just make a large map, fill it with thousands of trees of the old sort and one with thousands of trees of the new sort, comparek FPS on an old machine.

Everkistus · « **Reply #43 on:** August 09, 2012, 08:35:22 am »

Very nice work Dave. If this gets in the whole cRPG community can thank you for making the mod a bit better.

Byrdi · « **Reply #44 on:** August 09, 2012, 03:00:56 pm »

Really great job! Now this is a useful member of our cominity!

Author Topic: Fixed collision meshes (Read 3929 times)

Gravoth_iii

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Meow

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Meow

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Ozin

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Ozin

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

DaveUKR

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Bjord

Re: Fixed collision meshes

zagibu

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Everkistus

Re: Fixed collision meshes

Byrdi

Re: Fixed collision meshes