Author Topic: Crusader Kings 2.  (Read 14279 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #135 on: January 22, 2015, 03:13:15 pm »
+1
Voted kaiser? Hello no i took that with cold hard steel and brutal retribution. Charlemagne's legacy is not one of voting!

This was before I finished the run through but you get the idea.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Count of Vermandois, the heir of Charlemagne and only Karling ruler present at the start of the game.

AAR:
(click to show/hide)

After this I got myself in line for Byz throne and added that to my holdings. Just left papacy and some steppe hordes / Arab minors which I never got around to taking.

Couple of civil wars but as every single monarchy in my empire was held by a dyeasty member I ensured continual play. Independence factions never got big enough to beat my huge retinue and massive levies.

I don't know how this would work in the latest version, this was before they released Old God's and I am guessing they've played around with a lot of the balancing and faction play since then.

Also I think almost everyone of my rulers had the dwarf trait which makes the whole thing far more amusing to imagine :p
« Last Edit: January 22, 2015, 03:47:38 pm by Casimir »
Turtles

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #136 on: January 22, 2015, 06:19:20 pm »
0
So double-checked my save. 10 years have passed since war declared, still hold all of the territories they want and they're suffering no penalties, we're still at -40% warscore. This seems fucked up, guess there's no point in being a vassal if you cant influence warscore and that shit's broken, gonna reload a save from when i was independent if the game's fucking about.

*edit* also crashes nearly every time i try to load a game or start the game up, very frustrating game. Feel like it could be good but some of the mechanics make no sense, constant crashing doesnt help my opinion much. Meh.

Even if you are a weak count it generally is a crappy situation to be a vassal. It's much better to merely ally yourself to one of your neighbors.

And as Casimir said, becoming powerful in this game is more about aggressively scheming your way into inheriting titles and claims for your whole dynasty than about expanding EU4 style. I had a very funny run where I started as the King of East Francia (Karling, one of the easiest starts) and changed the inheritance rule to seniority. I made sure to maximize the number of children of my dynasty by systematically marriaging daughters matrilinearly and giving my male dynasty members all the titles I could. I ended up switching between being the ruler of various Karling kingdoms + East Francia each time my ruler died, because those kings had an uncanny habit to be second oldest dynasty member.

The mechanics in fact make a lot of sense, but their interactions gives a chaotic result which is historically accurate, kind of.

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #137 on: January 22, 2015, 07:42:17 pm »
0
Your king is still loosing battles i presume which will offset any gain he makes via the ticking warscore system since it ticks very slowly. If you hold on they will whitepeace eventually as 40% is a no winner situation.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #138 on: January 22, 2015, 07:43:08 pm »
0
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 08:34:12 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #139 on: January 22, 2015, 10:57:03 pm »
+1
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Best Challange ingame, althought i really enjoyed the SPQR one.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Armpit_Sweat

  • High Lord of the Spam
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1417
  • Infamy: 154
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Armpit_Sweat, My_horses_name_is_Rebecca
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #140 on: January 23, 2015, 03:11:21 pm »
0
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Best Challange ingame, althought i really enjoyed the SPQR one.

Try forming Israel starting in 768 :)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
  Spam at The Temple of Spam

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #141 on: January 23, 2015, 03:40:02 pm »
0
okay, did it as the jewish tribe once in the 1066 start (i think).
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Armpit_Sweat

  • High Lord of the Spam
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1417
  • Infamy: 154
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Armpit_Sweat, My_horses_name_is_Rebecca
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #142 on: January 23, 2015, 04:52:35 pm »
+1
okay, did it as the jewish tribe once in the 1066 start (i think).

Well, for me this was very challenging :) No alliances, no inheritances, only enemies all around. So you can't "cheat" your way to the throne of David through claims/marriage etc.
 
I have around 1100+ hours in CK2, and my Jewish games were always very demanding. Couldn't fool around with dwarf-king dynasties and such :)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
  Spam at The Temple of Spam

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #143 on: January 23, 2015, 05:01:31 pm »
0
Agreed if you start out as the jewish steppe kingdom its HARD, your whole game is a constant migration because frankly everyone hates your ass.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Armpit_Sweat

  • High Lord of the Spam
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1417
  • Infamy: 154
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Armpit_Sweat, My_horses_name_is_Rebecca
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #144 on: January 24, 2015, 02:43:07 am »
+2
Never seen this one before, must be the latest expantion:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


This character likes people...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
  Spam at The Temple of Spam

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Crusader Kings 2.
« Reply #145 on: January 24, 2015, 12:19:03 pm »
0
Armpit you havnt got way of life?!?! Its awesome get it!

Also I have never seen a guy that loves the other characters so much before in ck2....
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)