Author Topic: Next strategus  (Read 12294 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Olwen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 419
  • Infamy: 222
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • A shadow among others
    • View Profile
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #75 on: July 15, 2012, 10:47:14 am »
0
For anyone seriously thinking (I'm guessing you are not) this is a real possibility, I'd kindly ask him to leave this mod.

I know these are harsh words, but really: I would never play a game where I would suspect the devs capable of such actions. If anyone seriously thinks this might have happened before or might happen in the future, do the only possible consequence and turn around and find a different game. Because a game like this is not worth playing, at all.

you've always been an aboozer

you killed the mod

Offline Idzo

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 494
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Deserters
  • Game nicks: Deserter_IdZo
  • IRC nick: IdZo Steam Nick: Deja3n9
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #76 on: July 15, 2012, 11:32:04 am »
0
Half of ppl that are posting here needs professional help.
As usual, nothing important to help out this community doesnt happen.

Most of guys just whine and qq. Guys stop being annoying and destructive.

And don't quote me, thread is about next strat who shouldn't start yet because,
Wherever something happens, reply from devs is kinda like; this is beta.
I guess it will always be beta so no point in starting new seisson before this is patched and v1.0 released.

Urist: Being crpg mod makes you go insane at some point. look at meow, he thinks he's a fcking cat

Offline ArysOakheart

  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1322
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Free Peasants of Fisdnar
  • Game nicks: Arys_TheDrunkenPeasant
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #77 on: July 15, 2012, 12:01:44 pm »
0
Next strat? Free Peasants of Fisdnar claim Fisdnar.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #78 on: July 15, 2012, 01:18:03 pm »
0
For anyone seriously thinking (I'm guessing you are not) this is a real possibility, I'd kindly ask him to leave this mod.

I know these are harsh words, but really: I would never play a game where I would suspect the devs capable of such actions. If anyone seriously thinks this might have happened before or might happen in the future, do the only possible consequence and turn around and find a different game. Because a game like this is not worth playing, at all.

i know im late to the party here but im not super active on forums these days... anyways... I do remember fighting some nord affiliates and being against a ton of devs... and 90% of our players getting disconnected every 5 seconds and then spawning naked when they rejoin and us losing our flags as a result... and then nothing ever being done about it; at which point many of us took chadz advice and stopped playing strat (and in many cases cRPG).

that being said, most of us have come back (to crpg... very few of us have been active in strat since) and if strat 4.0 ever rolls out then if we like the look of it we will prolly play it again. I dont really think there was any malicious intent in the issue we faced, it was just disappointing that the devs were obviously aware of the occurance as many of them witnessed it first hand and yet they never bothered to do anything to make up for the huge loss of troops and gear that went directly to our enemies.

for reference of what im talking about you can check this thread http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,22611.0.html
« Last Edit: July 15, 2012, 01:21:50 pm by Matey »

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #79 on: July 15, 2012, 01:18:11 pm »
0
I'm sceptical about this "spy" of yours.

DUDE..when CMP gives me confidential info it's a FACT! ALLAH IS GREAT!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #80 on: July 15, 2012, 01:33:30 pm »
0
Let me also make a whine comment.

As for players who remember how this strat started, UIF was hmmmm.... united? With, I think, same goal as in every strat: to take certain lands.
I also think this was from the beginning clear, that we outnumber everyone else. With Fallens, HRE, krapikulu and some other factions.

So with that number of players we could make more troops, cash, better equipment and fullfil every roster. Bigger one wins the most of times, I suppose.

Yes, except as previously pointed out by someone within your own clan, about 40% of your guys were inactive. Of course it's a lot easier to make more troops, cash and equipment when you have one or two people with everyone's passwords "coordinating" all those inactives. Too bad the gravy train of inactive crafting slaves had to end, right? ;(
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline autobus

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 598
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bartering Brigade "Black Tea"
  • Game nicks: Autobus, Shushu, Samodur
  • IRC nick: Autobus
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #81 on: July 15, 2012, 01:37:54 pm »
+1
Yes, except as previously pointed out by someone within your own clan, about 40% of your guys were inactive. Of course it's a lot easier to make more troops, cash and equipment when you have one or two people with everyone's passwords "coordinating" all those inactives.

proof?

edit: proof of "about 40% of your guys were inactive" and "you have one or two people with everyone's passwords "coordinating" all those inactives"
« Last Edit: July 15, 2012, 01:44:01 pm by Kikimoure »

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #82 on: July 15, 2012, 01:39:39 pm »
-1
^^^^

Back when I was in GO we had about 30-40% memebers that were complitly inactive for weeks but still noone even thought about removing them from roster as like it happened many times they might come back to playing one day.

Oh Dalhi, of course they wouldn't remove them from roster, they wouldn't be able to use them otherwise.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Micah

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 539
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Micah_Senpai_von_Krems Glance_the_Useless_von_Krems Arielle_the_little_Mermaid
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #83 on: July 15, 2012, 01:57:02 pm »
+8
shame on all of you who accuse devs or admins to be corrupted and blaming them to split the community and such BS. you are the only ones that cause the very problems you are addressing. also you make those people feel bad that actually try to make this game better by spending much of their free time to deal with many problems so that you can play this game. you should imagine to be in their position and suddenly people like you come and talk such shit. i can only agree with chadz , go and find a different game pls ! coz i dont like you to be part of this community. shame on you...
I am writing long winded essays in shitty english.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #84 on: July 15, 2012, 02:10:14 pm »
+3
proof?

edit: proof of "about 40% of your guys were inactive" and "you have one or two people with everyone's passwords "coordinating" all those inactives"

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline autobus

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 598
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bartering Brigade "Black Tea"
  • Game nicks: Autobus, Shushu, Samodur
  • IRC nick: Autobus
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #85 on: July 15, 2012, 02:13:01 pm »
0
oh. nvm then.

Offline Protemus

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 346
  • Infamy: 270
  • cRPG Player
  • EZ
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan EZ kills
  • Game nicks: niluK_the_Annoying aka EZ
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #86 on: July 15, 2012, 02:27:25 pm »
0
I just love how oKin said on 1st page that Panos got banned because he deserved it (oKin wants to say he got banned for exploiting truth about cheating in Strategus,and how Admins like himself not only tolerate this,but actualy aprove it)

oKin man,screenshots ain't lying,Panos can lie yes,screenshots,NOPE

and I still don't get it why developers are available to be in clans,nevertless is that Nord or any other,I mean,they are HUMANS as we are,they have FEELINGS as we do,and if developer like cmp who are probably in one clan pretty long,it's NORMAL he will defend his fellow clanmates,I understand that and therefor they CAN'T make fair decisions for others,developer must be for himself,and answer to his boss only (in this case chadz)

I DEMAND justice,for as much as I see,there is a big LACK of it,Devs who are in clans,Admins who aprove cheating and ban those who GIVE PROOF about cheatings,for now,this community is awful,I really hope it will get better

Once again...I understand neither Devs or Admins are perfect,you are humans as we are and you do mistakes,but trying to hide OBVIUS cheating is unbeliveable
Quote from: Melee Gaming
Protemus, You have received a warning for non-relevant posts in ban section also for personal attacks with disgusting insults on the forums. Chill out and enjoy the game. Regards, cRPG Team

Offline Dalhi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 415
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Dalhi
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #87 on: July 15, 2012, 02:28:10 pm »
0
Do the math and count 30 percent out of 120 people  :rolleyes:, it's still  a lot of players. And mister fail detective you do realize that issue called account sharing was about strategus 2, it was explained several times but if you are still obsessed about that it's not my problem.

Yes, except as previously pointed out by someone within your own clan

Oh and I am not in GO for half a year.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2012, 03:08:20 pm by Dalhi »

Offline Araxiel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 387
  • Infamy: 77
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ((===||:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Vincent_Ruth
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #88 on: July 15, 2012, 04:11:58 pm »
0
Don't play in the next strat. I will do that. Just let Grey Order, Drz and Union have their fun together with their allies.
Well I roleplayed gay for long time to get Asca attention as harmless one but it didnt help. I only attracted Tueten, Cicero and Grey Order...

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #89 on: July 15, 2012, 04:32:08 pm »
+1
and I still don't get it why developers are available to be in clans

You do know that developers are 90% of the time themselves in clans, and usually in some of the best clans in their own game, though most use fake aliases to avoid silly people screaming foul and conjuring up insane conspiracies. This goes for every game genre out there (though when it come to FPS most developers themselves are quite bad at their own games). There's a trillion examples of developers in clans, that's the norm!

Secondly, just because Panos got banned doesn't mean nothing has (and is) being done about the issue he wrote about, he wasn't -- as have been explained a million times now but people always prefer to just read 3 lines of the first post and then post their presumptions instead of reading everything and then forming an opinion -- banned for posting the screenshots, anyone believing that should really look at themselves and their way of comprehending information.

They've asked plenty of times now on how to combat the issue and people are, as you can see in the suggestion forum, writing about their ideas in a constructive manner... You should try it sometime...

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!