Author Topic: Pikemen and the Phalanx  (Read 8253 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Pikemen and the Phalanx
« Reply #45 on: November 06, 2012, 02:01:19 pm »
0
Those guys were veterans of all of Alexander's campaigns though, like the wiki page says they weren't "ordinary" soldiers. They were fighting against brand new levies from Macedon that had almost never seen battle, certainly not the ammount that they had.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Thucydides

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 129
  • Infamy: 28
  • cRPG Player
  • I shat Uranus
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Thucydides
Re: Pikemen and the Phalanx
« Reply #46 on: November 30, 2012, 11:38:14 am »
+2
Those guys were veterans of all of Alexander's campaigns though, like the wiki page says they weren't "ordinary" soldiers. They were fighting against brand new levies from Macedon that had almost never seen battle, certainly not the ammount that they had.

which is why i said it was " mostly true". the limitation of the phalanx wasn't the formation itself, but the training of it's soldiers. This applies to all troop formations, but the phalanx was especially vulnerable to poorly trained troops. The levy nature of the later successor phalanx is what, IMO, led to the conception that the phalanx canntot meet attacks on it's flank and rear. With adequate training, a square could be formed to meet flanking pressure until they are reinforced.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2012, 11:41:21 am by Thucydides »

Offline no_rules_just_play

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1401
  • Infamy: 384
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE; Peasants United; Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: CapraAegagrusHircus_HRE; no_rules_just_play_HRE
  • IRC nick: norulesjustplay
Re: Pikemen and the Phalanx
« Reply #47 on: December 02, 2012, 02:27:58 pm »
+1
roman fighting style was completely different from phalanx:

they used their throwing spears to throw at the enemy but than they took their sword and used it to fight while behind the cover of their shield.
the romans made formations so when a guy on the front line fell, the person behind him could jump in and continue the fighting. their fighting style consisted out of staying low in the cover of your shield and hacking towards the enemies feet/body.
also, the front line and the last line of their formations were always the veteran fighters who werent scared to charge into the enemy and the backline could make sure the newbies didnt run away.