EU Servers - Game Admin applications OPEN

[okiN]

To avoid prejudice to the other players, admins should not be members of any clan.

Approved. Let's kick off every admin except Urist and Mylet. Reshuffle the deck a bit!

chadz is obviously too biased to be allowed to develop the mod in the first place.

[Braeden]

Approved. Let's kick off every admin except Braeden, Urist and Mylet. Reshuffle the deck a bit!

chadz is obviously too biased to be allowed to develop the mod in the first place.

Yeah, admins who are in clans are almost as bad as the new admins.

[okiN]

Oh shit, you're in a clan again? Well, obviously there's no way we'll be able to keep you around either, then.

Anyway, I guess we've sufficiently highlighted just how ridiculous that statement was, so let's cut the bullhonkey and get back to the actual applications.

[Paul]

No templar admins! Also, Michael back to business would help getting rid of all that atheism that spread like a plague on the cRPG servers lately.

On a serious note, +1 for Saint.

[Banok]

I can vouch for ujin and belmont, both mature guys.

[SDGS8]

i would like to see a templar as admin. i always see them as a fair clan with fair players 

[Vibe]

I would make a brilliant admin, I have a fine record of abusive violence, sexual harrasment and discrimination. I AM truly a man of the people! Also my blade often finds its way in a friendly player. A legend among men, I'd say!

[nuffen]

Lots of nice applications here that should be considered seriously. I will give my support to Guard_BD_Toffi when he makes an application. Hes never making trouble, and got a fair sense of how to use his administration rights in a fair way.

Im against having a templar as an admin, and especially Casimir. They was a good clan when they started, but now they are way too biased, and shows it. Whenever a templar is in trouble, you can bet at least a couple of templars can support him. They was there, they saw it, you know! Templars never intentionally TK, because they always got a couple of other templars who saw it and can prove their innocence, even if they wasnt on the server when it happened.
Casimir aint better, hes actually one of the worst. He ALWAYS support his templars, even if he just heard a rumor. Hell, I was once killed by a templar by a hit in the back with an alt that the templars didnt know was an admin, and Casimir was there in a sec, stating that I had attacked the templar first. No, I got so many bad experienced with this biased person, Im totally against Casimir getting any more power in this game.

Also we need Michael, too little admin abuse on the servers atm!

[Casimir]

You are implying i lie out callious or hatred.

Of course im going to defend my friends. Who the hell doesnt.

If i think the punishment is justified then so be it. However if i see something to the contray or here an account that differs significantly from the events described to me i will of course put my bit in.

As far as im aware the on templar to have issues is Angry Scotsman so other than that im not sure where all your hate has come from. Except my cries of Abooze in game evertime you do anything. Or are you still mad about the Olwen incident?

Personalities aside i currently have no power in cRPG so shouldnt worry to much should you.

[LordBerenger]

I support Michael as new admin. I'm sure he wouldn't be biased as others are and he would also do a excellent job i'm sure.

Forgive and forget! Make him admin.

[Punisher]

+1 for Ujin and Belmont, they would both be great admins.

[MrExxc]

I'll give it a shot. I would definitly do my best to keep everything nice smooth and dandy, I can speak English, French and Dutch, that might be usefull. And above all, I love cRPG, so my motivation would be sincere. Also, I play both on siege and battle servers...

Now I'll prolly won't get chosen, because I'm not "famous" on the servers like the other admins, therefor I'd give a +1 to the shoguns, they are in general very mature, I think they would do well as admins, or maybe not? Electing admins is a very important step to build up into a good game continuity, don't fuck it up.

[Opium.dk]

I would kick everyone on the server for lulz

[Duerkos]

I vouch for Ujin and Belmont. I'm sure there's a lot of good people who posted here, but I don't know them well as I've not played that much  . Apart from everything said, I think that Ujin and Belmont would be good admins because they don't take the game too seriously, and taking the game far too seriously is an error lots of admins do (and I, for example, would).

[Phazey]

Remember guys: adminning the EU servers is work. You will find yourself having to observe players a lot, even when you'd rather make a cup of tea or do something else.The kick and ban list is very unwieldy, especially when therer are over a hundred players on the server, so you'll spend a lot of time scrolling that huge list trying to find a player's name. Instead of playing, you'll be mediating squabbles between players... or skip rounds so you can observe a supposed griefer, only to find he's behaving fine that round.

So don't apply lightly thinking it's all fun and games. Take it seriously. And remember: i'll be watching you! No abooze allowed! 

Hehe, ok sorry for the mr. serious speech. Guess it's stating the obvious. 

Ujin, Belmont and Zotte all get a +1 from me (not that it matters, it's not up to us) and so does Tommy. Good luck guys.