Author Topic: Internal poleaxe balance  (Read 8428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2012, 05:41:43 pm »
+3
who cares about internal poleaxe balance?
visibly you don't so :
 :arrow: :arrow: :arrow:[]

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2012, 10:04:30 pm »
-2
yeah, if the solution to this is buffing the elegant poleaxe, you are looking at it way wrong

you need to nerf the shit out of the poleaxe, like -3 damage on all swings, probably even more, -5'd id say, and do the same with every other poleaxe too, except maybe only -3 damage on elegant poleaxe, then it MIGHT be fair, but you'd still need to remove polestagger and make them all unbalanced

at least make the poleaxe unbalanced god damn just look at the stats on that thing its a shield busting awlpike with side swings strong as a bardiche
« Last Edit: March 29, 2012, 10:05:34 pm by Smoothrich »
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Herkkutatti

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 292
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2012, 10:12:55 pm »
+1
yeah, if the solution to this is buffing the elegant poleaxe, you are looking at it way wrong

you need to nerf the shit out of the poleaxe, like -3 damage on all swings, probably even more, -5'd id say, and do the same with every other poleaxe too, except maybe only -3 damage on elegant poleaxe, then it MIGHT be fair, but you'd still need to remove polestagger and make them all unbalanced

at least make the poleaxe unbalanced god damn just look at the stats on that thing its a shield busting awlpike with side swings strong as a bardiche
QQ i just had to post this 
/l
(゚、 。 7
l、 ~ヽ
じしf_, )ノ Nerf archery ,please!

Offline Torben

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2011
  • Infamy: 352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • still prepare to get sexed
    • View Profile
  • Faction: by my overly nerfed heavy lance.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2012, 10:23:17 pm »
+4
omg all this whining,  always whineing and QQ gahrg!

look at the stats,  most NA damage is dealt with the longsword,  most eu damage with the danish,  most polearm damage with the LHB waaay before any poleaxe.

back to the topic:  the elegant needs a tiny speed or damage boost id say.

Yes, I know from whence I came! Discontented as a flame, Upon myself I live and glow. All I grasp like lightning flashes, All I leave behind is ashes
Flame I am - that much I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline ArchonAlarion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 98
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Late 15th cen. English Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: ArchonAlarion, DON'T_WAKE_GRANDPA, NASTY_TURTLE, UNARMED_CLASS_ DON'T_BAN_PLS, et al.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2012, 06:25:42 pm »
0
Fix- Make elegant poleaxe do significantly more blunt damage on its secondary mode. It would then be "elegant" in it's versatility, and add more variety to the poleaxes.

Also a speed nerf to all poleaxes, with an extra speed nerf to regular poleaxe. (-2, -2, -3/4)
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 06:27:57 pm by ArchonAlarion »

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2012, 06:30:42 pm »
0
why the hell do you so much want a speed nerf on poleaxes? regular poleaxe is already 89 going any lower would be too much. if ever you should nerf the poleaxe you should attack it's damage

Offline ArchonAlarion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 98
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Late 15th cen. English Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: ArchonAlarion, DON'T_WAKE_GRANDPA, NASTY_TURTLE, UNARMED_CLASS_ DON'T_BAN_PLS, et al.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2012, 06:33:06 pm »
0
why the hell do you so much want a speed nerf on poleaxes? regular poleaxe is already 89 going any lower would be too much. if ever you should nerf the poleaxe you should attack it's damage

The speed of all large weapons is pretty insane already. I care less about the suggested speed nerf, than adding x-mode versatility though.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2012, 06:33:23 pm »
+1
Buff elegant a bit (2 cut or something), keep the other poleaxes as they are, nerf glaive a lot.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2012, 06:37:20 pm »
0
The speed of all large weapons is pretty insane already. I care less about the suggested speed nerf, than adding x-mode versatility though.

yes but if we follow your argument we should nearly nerf all weapons. the weigth of all poleaxes are not higher then most weapons

agree gurnisson, glaive is stoopid
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 08:50:08 pm by Lactose_the_intolerant »

Offline ArchonAlarion

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 98
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Late 15th cen. English Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: ArchonAlarion, DON'T_WAKE_GRANDPA, NASTY_TURTLE, UNARMED_CLASS_ DON'T_BAN_PLS, et al.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2012, 07:06:48 pm »
0
yes but if we follow your argument we should nearly nerf all weapons. the wait of all poleaxes are not higher then most weapons

No, that does not follow.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2012, 07:15:43 pm »
0
Buff elegant a bit (2 cut or something), keep the other poleaxes as they are, nerf glaive a lot.

This would be nice.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Torben

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2011
  • Infamy: 352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • still prepare to get sexed
    • View Profile
  • Faction: by my overly nerfed heavy lance.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2012, 08:02:47 pm »
+2
i´d say take away speed nerf of elegants secondary mode and  +3 blunt damage to gnjus nose
Yes, I know from whence I came! Discontented as a flame, Upon myself I live and glow. All I grasp like lightning flashes, All I leave behind is ashes
Flame I am - that much I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2012, 08:10:21 pm »
0
Buff elegant a bit (2 cut or something), keep the other poleaxes as they are, nerf glaive a lot.

I'd say an 1c/2p buff would be indeed awesome.

Just because of it's cost. It should be way better.

Also if you check the stabs of the three weapons, Regular got 31, German got 29, Elegant got.. 26?
Where's the analogy? It should be 28.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline BlackMilk

  • Polearm Lover
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 370
  • Infamy: 144
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: el_Banduri
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2012, 08:15:51 pm »
0
I'd say an 1c/2p buff would be indeed awesome.

Just because of it's cost. It should be way better.

Also if you check the stabs of the three weapons, Regular got 31, German got 29, Elegant got.. 26?
Where's the analogy? It should be 28.

so the danish gs should have more stab damage than the german gs because its more expensive?

So your point is that a weapon that costs more has to be better at everything?
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 08:56:01 pm by BlackMilk »

Offline Torben

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2011
  • Infamy: 352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • still prepare to get sexed
    • View Profile
  • Faction: by my overly nerfed heavy lance.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2012, 08:21:54 pm »
0
so the danish gs should have more stab damage than the german gs because its more expensive?

are you serious about your posts?
its longer,  has more slash and only costs 800 more
Yes, I know from whence I came! Discontented as a flame, Upon myself I live and glow. All I grasp like lightning flashes, All I leave behind is ashes
Flame I am - that much I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login