0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
An agi build can use a blunt or pierce weapon if they play smart. Which it seems some don't want to have to do.
I am going for a ps8 build now, and currently I have 7 and I hit an unhelmeted strength build in the head again today and it didn't kill.I get 1 shotted all the time in the head with cut weapons even and I have a decent helmet.
Also, I have declared myself #1 NA hybrid thrower
Well, I could trade my loomed gear for lordy Milanese full set, 2 mil of gold and a MW Flamberge. Could play for 6 months like that with some occasional Siege low gear farming. With my AGI build I would kill twice as much. There's a reason why I don't do it, same reason why I don't use blunt or pierce 2H weapons. Some people care about style...
But the balance should not be agi can 1 hit strength user in the head. It should not be agi can 3 hit strength user with cut damage. It should not be agi can survive 3 hits from high PS build.
Just remove HP bonus from strength.
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.My UU key is broken incase you can't tell
Strength is more viable in the game, that is true. But why shouldn't it be? It's not that you are forced to choose AGI dominated builds. In my opinion, this would only limit creativity. There is nothing concerning the balance.
No, it's not. If 3-39 was both viable and capable of getting 13 ath, that would be unbalanced. Et cetera - of course some builds are 'less viable' than others.