Author Topic: Old game sequels that should have been  (Read 3793 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline B3RS3RK

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 377
  • Infamy: 103
  • cRPG Player
  • Sexy and I know it.
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Saracen_Berserkaziz_Amir
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2012, 11:17:25 pm »
+1
a total war game like medieval I

Or precisely: A good TW game.
Maybe it woud be better for me to find out where you life and kill you when you are satch a Soziopath. You have enough now.
"I don´t believe in anything, I´m just here for the violence."

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2012, 11:22:34 pm »
0
a total war game like medieval I

Or precisely: A good TW game.

Rome II/ Medieval III y/y?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #47 on: February 09, 2012, 11:34:16 pm »
0
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



need to make a new one of this, was an open world style game really good for its time :L

Rome II/ Medieval III y/y?

A Rome II would be awesome especially with the graphics of shogun 2 and the way they fight, would be interesting to see what they would do with shields and if they would actually block arrows O.o

and Id say Medieval 3 sounds ok but I don't really see what they could add to it apart from graphics and stuff, with rome at least they would make it a different part of romes history...
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #48 on: February 09, 2012, 11:37:52 pm »
0
A Rome II would be awesome especially with the graphics of shogun 2 and the way they fight, would be interesting to see what they would do with shields and if they would actually block arrows O.o

Just install a decent mod.

I remember that I couldn't kill any shielded troop like Hoplites close together standing, or a testudo formation with a volley of 5 Cretan Archer teams. RTR was the one I played, only real use of archery was to run to the sides, or aim for crappy troops/skirmishers. Kinda realistic.

Sure, a few fell after some time, but it was next to useless, thinking on a huge battle scenario.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #49 on: February 10, 2012, 01:16:27 am »
0
Just install a decent mod.

I remember that I couldn't kill any shielded troop like Hoplites close together standing, or a testudo formation with a volley of 5 Cretan Archer teams. RTR was the one I played, only real use of archery was to run to the sides, or aim for crappy troops/skirmishers. Kinda realistic.

Sure, a few fell after some time, but it was next to useless, thinking on a huge battle scenario.

yeah archers were pretty crap and pointless in the game, I think that they should make the third age mod in to an actual Total war game, the mod is epic and if total war and sega back it it would be just plain epic, the films= awesome books= great the mod= amazing.....an actual version made by total war...... *jizz*  :twisted:  8-)
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #50 on: February 10, 2012, 01:23:04 am »
0
yeah archers were pretty crap and pointless in the game,

Nah.

Just imagine the "noob box", a square of phalangites, with dozens of archers inbetween.

Ordering them to stand ground, and with clever positioning, they won't shoot your own men.

It's stupidly powerful against the dumb AI.
Especially if you've got heavy cavalry to rout them from behind, while they're busy breaking your phalanx wall.
(Using fire arrow volleys speed this up, one charge from behind will turn into a mass rout because of the morale decrease.)
Lame strategy, and I tried to use it as few times as possible.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2012, 01:25:42 am by Christo »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #51 on: February 10, 2012, 01:28:11 am »
0
Nah.

Just imagine the "noob box", a square of phalangites, with dozens of archers inbetween.

Ordering them to stand ground, and with clever positioning, they won't shoot your own men.

It's stupidly powerful against the dumb AI.
Especially if you've got heavy cavalry to rout them from behind, while they're busy breaking your phalanx wall.
(Using fire arrow volleys speed this up, one charge from behind will turn into a mass rout because of the morale decrease.)
Lame strategy, and I tried to use it as few times as possible.

I only ever used them to wound the enemy inf then hammer them with legionaries them hitting them in the rear with cav to rout them easy tatic against a stupid bot as you said
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #52 on: February 10, 2012, 01:29:25 am »
0
I only ever used them to wound the enemy inf then hammer them with legionaries them hitting them in the rear with cav to rout them easy tatic against a stupid bot as you said

Well, hence the name, ROME total war, I never played as Rome.  :lol:

I don't like their fighting style, prefer the Macedonian/Greek way more.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #53 on: February 10, 2012, 01:33:14 am »
0
Well, hence the name, ROME total war, I never played as Rome.  :lol:

I don't like their fighting style, prefer the Macedonian/Greek way more.

fair enough playing as Rome can be pretty easy unless your  fighting the other houses. playing as the barbarian factions was fun though :P
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #54 on: February 10, 2012, 01:34:50 am »
0
fair enough playing as Rome can be pretty easy unless your  fighting the other houses. playing as the barbarian factions was fun though :P

Don't get me started on that "Houses" thing..  :)

I don't know what Creative Assembly was smoking when they thought up that.

Makes zero sense, there was the Roman "Kingdom", Republic, and later, the famous Empire that conquered the most.
And no "houses that control different parts of the faction".
« Last Edit: February 10, 2012, 01:36:28 am by Christo »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #55 on: February 10, 2012, 01:51:34 am »
0
Think its to do with something before the Empire when the three most powerful men in Rome controlled nearly everything, Pompey and julius caesar were two but i cant remember the third ill try and find the video about it
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 278
  • Infamy: 478
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #56 on: February 10, 2012, 02:11:12 am »
0
Third was one of the richest people in human history, Marcus Licinius Crassus.

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #57 on: February 10, 2012, 02:45:05 am »
0
thanks leshma cant find the video  :? but it told you about what each man did and how it caused a civil war
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #58 on: February 10, 2012, 03:43:22 am »
0
You mean the Triumvirate?

Well yes, that's somewhat close, but totally, totally different than the three big houses idea of RTW.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Old game sequels that should have been
« Reply #59 on: February 10, 2012, 04:06:04 am »
0
You mean the Triumvirate?

Well yes, that's somewhat close, but totally, totally different than the three big houses idea of RTW.

not really, The three most powerfull men in Rome each with their own army.. Three of the most powerfull Houses in Rome each fighting to gain power over rome and rule it. pretty dam close  :P
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.