Author Topic: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate  (Read 2766 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« on: January 21, 2012, 02:17:58 am »
0
wiki article about the subject for those interested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodkin_point

Offline Tzar

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 564
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_TzarOfRushYa
  • IRC nick: TZAR
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2012, 02:23:11 am »
+4
wiki article about the subject for those interested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodkin_point



Wrong section

Correct section the Realism section AKA the we dont give a shit about realism section  :arrow: http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/board,69.0.html

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
I've never played a server where people split up as much or as often as on EU1.  No wonder range is having a field day.

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2012, 02:31:03 am »
0
tbh this says that even bodkins should only make small damage to plate, and "normal"  = broadhead arrows should do none.

That's my point. ( Pun intended.)  Horses and everyone except plate wearers should be vulnerable to (1 or 2) arrow shots to the body in game.  X-bows could penetrate plate, therefore even plate wearers in game should suffer from 1 to 2 x bow shots.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2012, 02:37:17 am »
0
That's my point. ( Pun intended.)  Horses and everyone except plate wearers should be vulnerable to (1 or 2) arrow shots to the body in game.  X-bows could penetrate plate, therefore even plate wearers in game should suffer from 1 to 2 x bow shots.

Wouldn't have been infantry left (bar platers) :lol:
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2012, 02:39:50 am »
0
Wouldn't have been infantry left (bar platers) :lol:

By the time true pavise arbalests came about, most professional armies were heavily armoured. Problem is cRPG has a wide disparity of era weaponry.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2012, 04:34:25 am »
+1
Wouldn't have been infantry left (bar platers) :lol:

Shields are a natural defense against ranged.  The anti-ranged lobby wants to be shield free.  To do that they need to neuter the archers.

Offline Shik

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 510
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Gilmore Girls
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2012, 06:14:38 am »
0
http://www.myarmoury.com/feature_mail.html
scroll down to "weapons vs mail." this topic is irrelevant anyways because it has nothing to do with balance or gameplay.

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2012, 01:51:14 pm »
0
wiki article about the subject for those interested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodkin_point
'In a modern test, a direct hit from a steel bodkin point penetrated Damascus chain armour, although at point blank range.[2] However, the test was conducted without a padded jack or gambeson, which was layered cloth armor worn over heavier armor for protection against projectiles, as it was known to stop even heavy arrows.'

'Armour of the Medieval eras was not completely proof against arrows until the specialized armour of the Italian city-state mercenary companies.'

'Some recent tests have demonstrated that needle bodkins could penetrate all but heavy steel plate armour; one test used padded "jack" armour, coat of plates, iron and steel mail and steel plate. A needle bodkin penetrated every type, but may not have been able to inflict a lethal injury behind plate.'

That's my point. ( Pun intended.)  Horses and everyone except plate wearers should be vulnerable to (1 or 2) arrow shots to the body in game.  X-bows could penetrate plate, therefore even plate wearers in game should suffer from 1 to 2 x bow shots.
Are you sure you read your own wikipedia page, the information I got from it suggests that the armour penetrating abilities of the bodkin arrow are hugely overrated ingame, let alone the actual stopping power.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2012, 01:53:24 pm »
0
Shields are a natural defense against ranged.  The anti-ranged lobby wants to be shield free.  To do that they need to neuter the archers.

You tell me how I'm supposed to carry a shield with support weapons like Bill, Long Awlpike, Long Spear etc.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 828
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2012, 01:54:39 pm »
0
You tell me how I'm supposed to carry a shield with support weapons like Bill, Long Awlpike, Long Spear etc.

Stick with people who are.

Offline SquishMitten

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Waylander
  • Game nicks: Mew, Kitty + many more
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2012, 01:55:01 pm »
+1
You tell me how I'm supposed to carry a shield with support weapons like Bill, Long Awlpike, Long Spear etc.
put it on your back and walk backwards when you see ranged :3
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In memory of Merciless_Mew, member of Merciless, ruler of Istiniar

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2012, 01:56:31 pm »
+1
Only thing to note : buff armor.

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2456
  • Infamy: 2352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2012, 02:01:15 pm »
0
No. Armor is already OP, don't make it even stronger.

To be good at melee, all you need is shitload of armor and some long polearm like glaive or poleaxe.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2012, 02:01:20 pm »
0
Stick with people who are.

Considering he wants arrows to one-shoot mail to the body it wouldn't really help much, would it now. Pikers would be the only ones shot at before infantry clash, and considering the amount of archers this change would've brought that wouldn't be hard at all :lol:

Just consider how the server would've been IF this had been active. HAs one-shooting infantry with bumpshot, platers ignoring ranged and spamming down the archers they could reach, all other infantry dying to crossfire by one arrow each. Would be good times. :lol:
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: Arrow effectiveness against mail and plate
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2012, 03:57:39 pm »
0
turkhammer spewing his retardness all over the forums again nothing to see here.

p.s. bodkins couldnt penetrate plate even at 25 meters shot.from a longbow they mostly bounced off and if.they did punch through they certanly didnt get passed the mail underneath so they.were mostly only a nuisance. they were dangerous only if.hitting through rare gaps in the armor like under the arm, knee etc.
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login