Author Topic: Really melee-ers?  (Read 12324 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline n445

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 40
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2012, 07:08:15 pm »
+1
So you don't think a blond with big boobs jiggling up and down is a decent avatar?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Very funny. I think that anyone who would purposely put something like that as a forum avatar lacks maturity. You never see anyone with the least bit of maturity doing that, do you? It has nothing with being gay, it has something to do with being mature.
01000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 01000010 01110010 01100101 01100111 01101101 01100001 01101110 00000000 000000000000000001000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 00000000 0000000001001001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01001011 01110010 01101111 011011

Offline godhanger

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 9
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: godhanger
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2012, 07:09:15 pm »
-1
 in response to IR_Kuoin
no. only adolescents and virgins think that is a cool avatar.

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2012, 07:09:23 pm »
0

More realistic?? Have you never done archery on a plate target? It penetrated. If this were realistic, it wound't bounce off, it would still penetrate, plate wasn't designed to protect against archers, it was designed to protect against cute attacks. not pierce. So before you post "facts" on a forum, check them out to see if they are actually correct.

Take your own advice 445.  Look on you tube for "Weapons that made Britain" (or something very similar) and look at the tests conducted with bodkins against plate.  The bodkins could penetrate but not consistently.  When they did penetrate it was not often disabling due to padding or padding and mail worn beneath the armor.

Offline n445

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 40
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2012, 07:09:39 pm »
0
Derp, your point has nothing to do with what I am actually talking about.

I am glad cRPG is less like Counterstrike now though, kiting archers have to shoot a guy more than twice to kill him, oh the horror!!!.

I have 8 powerdraw. takes me 8 hits to kill someone...
01000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 01000010 01110010 01100101 01100111 01101101 01100001 01101110 00000000 000000000000000001000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 00000000 0000000001001001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01001011 01110010 01101111 011011

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1372
  • Infamy: 995
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #34 on: January 20, 2012, 07:10:27 pm »
+1
Nerf cav!

Offline IR_Kuoin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1761
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player
  • What too write here?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigåde
  • Game nicks: KuoiN, Ziath
  • IRC nick: Simply Kuoin
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #35 on: January 20, 2012, 07:10:34 pm »
0
And now cavalry are too many. yay?

n445 stop whining and enjoy the fucking mod you amature of a player
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #36 on: January 20, 2012, 07:10:52 pm »
0
in response to IR_Kuoin
no. only adolescents and virgins think that is a cool avatar.

LOL, look at your avatar.  It looks like it's got a white boner over that blonde. :D

Offline SquishMitten

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Waylander
  • Game nicks: Mew, Kitty + many more
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #37 on: January 20, 2012, 07:11:40 pm »
+1
Regardless of how it was in real life, this is a game, if archers did the damage some people claim they could, servers would be archers and shielders only. For the sake of game play we cant have archers wtfpwning everything they shoot at.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In memory of Merciless_Mew, member of Merciless, ruler of Istiniar

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #38 on: January 20, 2012, 07:12:10 pm »
+2
And now cavalry are too many. yay?
Percentage of cavalry is fine.

Anyway, you evidently are not to be reasoned with. Suck it, archer scum, play this game the manly way.

Offline godhanger

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 9
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: godhanger
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #39 on: January 20, 2012, 07:14:12 pm »
0
nobody said archers needed to pwn, but i take maybe 1/7 damage in a chain skirt vs bodkins on a sunny day. im not a dedicated archer and i can tell there is something wrong with that.

edit: zero iron flesh btw

Offline SquishMitten

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Waylander
  • Game nicks: Mew, Kitty + many more
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #40 on: January 20, 2012, 07:15:49 pm »
0
And now cavalry are too many. yay?

shoot the horse in the head, much easier than hitting infantry in the head, esp if the horse is coming towards you
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In memory of Merciless_Mew, member of Merciless, ruler of Istiniar

Offline n445

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 40
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #41 on: January 20, 2012, 07:16:00 pm »
+1
Either way, this has gone way being what was intended here. I'm going to leave this thread to take it's course, my rant is over =D


BTW: There is no MANLY way to play a game. To think there is a manly way proves your own immaturity towards other peoples POV and ideas. So before trolling a thread with those comments, think about it.

Thanks for the feedback, arguments, and accepting my rants guys =)
« Last Edit: January 20, 2012, 07:18:09 pm by n445 »
01000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 01000010 01110010 01100101 01100111 01101101 01100001 01101110 00000000 000000000000000001000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 00000000 0000000001001001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01001011 01110010 01101111 011011

Offline Dezilagel

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 722
  • Infamy: 209
  • cRPG Player
  • (X) probably goes well with Nutella
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Guards, Guards!
  • Game nicks: Dezi_the_Bagel
  • IRC nick: Dezilagel
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #42 on: January 20, 2012, 07:19:11 pm »
0
And now cavalry are too many. yay?

Well, cav at least has to be somewhat close to you to do anything, and is countered by other things than cavalry. (Even though, with proper technique it is very much possible to attack without exposing yourself to direct danger from even an aware oponent, but then this is nullified in gorups and cav tends to vbe suck-ish once people group up).

That twatchers are respeccing to lancers does not surprise me, sadly.

I have 8 powerdraw. takes me 8 hits to kill someone...

Aaaand... Bullshit.

Before the patch, high str archers did something like 70% to me on average (I don't wear much armor, nor have any IF), a 2-shot kill. With the new patch, it's more likely a 3-shot kill, but the main thing that has made me die less to arrows now is the fact that so many archers seem to have RQ'd.

Either way, this has gone way being what was intended here. I'm going to leave this thread to take it's course, my rant is over =D


BTW: There is no MANLY way to play a game. To think there is a manly way proves your own immaturity towards other peoples POV and ideas. So before trolling a thread with those comments, think about it.

Thanks for the feedback, arguments, and accepting my rants guys =)

Yeah, because what he meant is exactly, literally what he wrote  :rolleyes:

Even a twelve-year old fluent in English could decipher that message...
« Last Edit: January 20, 2012, 07:21:23 pm by Dezilagel »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Rumblood
You fuck, or you get fucked.
Valour Multghulis - All Krems Must Die

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #43 on: January 20, 2012, 07:20:58 pm »
+4
No worries, I apologize for the snark, I just don't think that shooting modern arrows with a modern bow into a square flat piece of sheet iron suddenly turns someone into a medieval armor expert.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline n445

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 40
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Really melee-ers?
« Reply #44 on: January 20, 2012, 07:21:25 pm »
0
nobody said archers needed to pwn, but i take maybe 1/7 damage in a chain skirt vs bodkins on a sunny day. im not a dedicated archer and i can tell there is something wrong with that.

edit: zero iron flesh btw

01000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 01000010 01110010 01100101 01100111 01101101 01100001 01101110 00000000 000000000000000001000001 01110010 01110100 01111001 01101111 01101101 00000000 0000000001001001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01001011 01110010 01101111 011011