Level 33 and above retirements...4th level of heirlooms

[zagibu]

Hmmm. Maybe if you retire at level 35, you can make one of your items legendary. Additionally, only 1 legendary item of the type should be allowed universally (meaning if someone already has a legendary Danish Greatsword, no one else will be able to make one).

[Kajia]

waaait! why don't just implement a feature to NAME an item after us, or as we want, after 4th retirement?
I'd love to see Kajias huscarl somewhere, or trade some really unique named weapons from others, say Tors Nordic Warlord Helmet or something.

And who doesn't want an epic Item of an epic player? huh? That's legendary I'd say.
I think of this name as a replacer for the prefix 'masterwork' etc.

[Vibe]

I'm against all kinds of looms, even more against looms for lvl 33+ as it only encourages lifeless grind.

[VVarlord]

waaait! why don't just implement a feature to NAME an item after us, or as we want, after 4th retirement?
I'd love to see Kajias huscarl somewhere, or trade some really unique named weapons from others, say Tors Nordic Warlord Helmet or something.

And who doesn't want an epic Item of an epic player? huh? That's legendary I'd say.
I think of this name as a replacer for the prefix 'masterwork' etc.

This would have been nice from the beginning to see where each heirloom came from.

Which noobs poophammer got all his gear from

[Kajia]

Which noobs poophammer got all his gear from

yeah, and then we see he doesn't even got a poophammer himself.

[Blashyrkh]

I would say leave the hairlooms as they are but to get that +4 point you have to retire at lvl 35.

[B3RS3RK]

Hmmm. Maybe if you retire at level 35, you can make one of your items legendary. Additionally, only 1 legendary item of the type should be allowed universally (meaning if someone already has a legendary Danish Greatsword, no one else will be able to make one).

YES!

Epic suggestion!

That way, only very few People will have legendarys(lvl 35 is one bitch) AND they will be even more precious.Should only be doable with a +3 item already.

[Tears of Destiny]

How about the 4th tier loom is purely visual, no added stats?
This gives incentive to the grinders/wantsSHINIES but does not unbalance the game.

[Bulzur]

How about the 4th tier loom is purely visual, no added stats?
This gives incentive to the grinders/wantsSHINIES but does not unbalance the game.

Kajia's idea of name implemented is better for epenis and jokes. After the masterworked rus bow, here comes the "thunderbolt", same stats, same look. Or "ToD's doombringer", or whatever.

I'm sure there's people who'll retire just for this, i mean. It's... AWESOME !
It's... LEGEN... wait for it.... DARY !

[ThePoopy]

remove heirlooming .

[Gravoth_iii]

Insta MW weapon on lvl 33 sounds good, or 4th loom.

[Kafein]

Named heirlooms !!!

Epic !!!

I'm sure that even for a mere +1 speed and +1 damage, many people would retire at level 33 to have their name on a heap of bytes, myself included

[justme]

oh comeon,how many lvl 33 are in crpg?maybe 30, or 40, and half of them wouldnt retire for that 1 extra speed damage.. high lvls need some motivation.. if this is problem, make limit at lvl 34..

[Cepeshi]

Nah, no 4th loom level, if you want to give all people some motivation to keep playing, just do a plain reset 

[sWalker]

The sWalker likes Zagibu's suggestion to a degree.  It would make it more worthwhile if you can only have one 4th level loom per person.  The sWalker believes that only one of a kind in the game would be an unbalancing factor (i.e. nobody could work hard to have equal equipment in the area they desired).

A poll has been added.  Please vote even if you don't comment, so the holy developers can garner information from their lowly followers at a glance.