Poll

would this make sense and pay archers attention on their aim?

Yes
47 (44.8%)
No
58 (55.2%)

Total Members Voted: 105

Author Topic: only ranged FF reflective?  (Read 4932 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hippy_with_a_scimi

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 55
  • Infamy: 9
  • cRPG Player
  • Balbasaur
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Balbaroth since the dawn of times
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #60 on: October 11, 2011, 06:48:47 pm »
0
Mr Shine is right.  :o

Any tk penalty can be used for griefing. Just step into their swing / line of fire at the right time and *boom*, gotcha. Hahah, i made you lose xp and gold.

No way around that, i think.  :?

 that jump in their swing \ line of fire excuse  has to go , we cant have a serious talk with that getting spit around the thread  either with or without FF ,  people will always do that. 

 

   

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #61 on: October 11, 2011, 07:04:36 pm »
+2
the fact an archer will almost always have a target on the field that he can fire at without risking hitting a team mate, which is what he should be doing.

Sorry, but that's just not true. Take, for example, the end of a round. You (the archer) and one of your team mates, a peasant, are still alive facing one two hander wielding tincan.

The tincan engages the brave peasant. The peasant turns out to be a reasonable blocker (recently retired player maybe) and manages to stay alive for 30 seconds whilst desperately blocking the tincan's swings. Maybe he even gets a hit in himself.

Should you not fire at that tincan? Ofcourse you should! You try to manoeuvre into a favourable position but not shooting at that tincan, even though you risk hitting the peasant, is just stupid.

Reflective damage for ranged is lame and it will not fix your 'problem'. People will still get teamhit by ranged, but now it will suck even more because the ranged tends to drop dead at odd moments due to reflective damage.

In short, reflective damage sucks.  :)

Offline Wookimonsta

  • Hoopy frood
  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 206
  • Infamy: 143
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #62 on: October 11, 2011, 07:11:39 pm »
-1
+1, best idea i heard all day
Quote
[14:36] <@chadz> when you login there is a message "your life as horse archer was too depressing for you. you decided to commit suicide. please create a new char"
Quote
<dexxtaa> I just saw nakey ladies and I left
Quote
<@Fasader> dexxtaa is clearly gay

Offline The_Bloody_Nine

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 946
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "I am still alive"
    • View Profile
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #63 on: October 11, 2011, 08:03:33 pm »
+1
This is practically all that is needed to know to state that reflective damage is no good. I stand by Phazh's comments like a fanboi on this one, a much clearer and better way of saying what I wanted to say and failed to do.
Well yeah, kind off misunderstood you there then.

To the sound of Phaz!

Offline Tennenoth

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 818
  • Infamy: 85
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "Bloody peasant archers!"
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Head)
  • Game nicks: Guard_Tenne; Guard_The_Biscuits; Guard_Bugden; Guard_Tennenuff
  • IRC nick: Tennenoth
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #64 on: October 11, 2011, 08:04:49 pm »
+1
Well yeah, kind off misunderstood you there then.

To the sound of Phaz!

To the sound of Phazh! xD
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

BullDog Clan member since 31/08/2010 / Caravan Guild member since 03/08/2010

How to understand what I say.
Always finish your tea and biscuits regardless of how terrible they are

Offline gazda

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player
  • Its almost harvesting season.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Saracens
  • Game nicks: Gazda_the_Swine
  • IRC nick: gazda
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2011, 08:22:37 pm »
0
I have a solution

Our hero legolas shoots into melee, and hits, but no, oh god is it true, he hit a TEAMMATE. God almighty gets very furious and punishes our poor legolas by punishing his damned eyes.*

*edges of the screen get transparently blackened periodically by each shot, so the angle of sight gets smaller and smaller
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Raki

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Teresa
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #66 on: October 11, 2011, 08:46:23 pm »
0
Tbh, I'd rather have 2-3 friendly archers try to help me kill one person than joining a ganking squad to kill said person. I get shot by a friendly archer maybe once or twice a week. On the other hand, join a ganking squad (not talking about organized killing squads from one clan or something) and you can bet your life on it there's going to be at least one teamhit. I'd go as far as saying that there's a pretty big chance that your team ends up damaging itself more than it damaged the other team.

So yeah, I know getting teamhit by an archer sucks, but adding FF is a bit too much.

Also, if an archer sucks at shooting and yet can't help but play Legolas, his team will probably tell him to find another class.

Offline The_Bloody_Nine

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 946
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "I am still alive"
    • View Profile
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #67 on: October 11, 2011, 08:49:56 pm »
0
Regarding the problem of being shot in the back while in melee:

I rage like mad if I'm in a one on one, have everything under control, and feel like having a good chance of beating the enemy and boom - a friendly arrow in the back and I get finished off in two secs. It can be even worse with cav, I dehorse an enemy, go in for the killing strike while he's on the ground and boom - a friendly cav tks me.

Those situations are extreme and extreme unnecessary, but in most cases people say sorry for it and mean it as far as I can tell. I tried cav and archer alts as well and of course I did some stupid teamwounding now and then, but reflective damage surely would not make it feel more wrong. Sure it is possible and likely that there are a few assholes out there who don't even feel a bit sorry for it, but reflective damage would mean too much sacrifices in therms of immersion and gameplay.

Offline Summer Glau

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
  • #QWIKSCOPE #MLG #SWAG
    • View Profile
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #68 on: October 11, 2011, 09:09:18 pm »
0
Archers = overpowered 100% confirmed tbh plz nerf/ban ASAP imo tiatiatia
« Last Edit: October 11, 2011, 09:10:47 pm by Summer Glau »

Offline The_Bloody_Nine

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 946
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "I am still alive"
    • View Profile
Re: only ranged FF reflective?
« Reply #69 on: October 11, 2011, 09:11:03 pm »
0
nvm, sarcasm detector fail.

and you changed your post :P
« Last Edit: October 11, 2011, 09:12:13 pm by The_Bloody_Nine »