Author Topic: HACKED  (Read 2102 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mordhau

  • Guest
HACKED
« on: October 07, 2011, 04:05:17 pm »
+2
HACKED
« Last Edit: June 08, 2013, 02:49:59 pm by Kulin_ban »

Offline Penitent

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1389
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Penitent_Turtler
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2011, 04:59:12 pm »
+3
meh.

I've been on maps with construction spam.  Sometimes defenders win, sometimes attackers.

I think defense needs a boost...since rendom ppl defending RARELY defend the flag or the choke points that need defending to win the map.  On the other hand, attackers that don't know what they are doing will still generally go towards the flag.

Totally depends on the map though.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2011, 05:26:23 pm »
0
just make consite bannable on all servers.

Boom! The only way to then "ladder spam" is by dieing and that makes life hard for defenders with there 30 sec respawn.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Sagar

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 463
  • Infamy: 279
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bogumili
  • Game nicks: Sagar
  • IRC nick: Sagar
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2011, 05:44:01 pm »
0
Construction spam really ruined siege gameplay. Last couple days only thing I do as a attacker is try to crush thru barricade. chadz do something about this.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2011, 05:55:15 pm »
0
I like it, as too many maps favour attackers, or have massive doors not gates and are thus vulnerable to the first round hp bug, and the construction spam helps counter this.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2011, 05:58:57 pm »
0
1. Before Fasader change number of slots from 120 to 80 on EU_2, EU_5 most of time was empty.

2. About CS and ladders. When I started play cRPG i saw on siege server that most people use this crap, so i thought that this is normal for this mod. Personally I don't use this anymore. After last patch I don't play week maybe two. And after I return I saw more and bigger barricades. And not only Greys, so get the fuck off.
The most important here is weapon rack. I'm not saying that barricades are good, but devs give this to all players. Everyone can use this, so it is a part of game. Until devs say this is bad, I will treat this like a part of this mod.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2011, 06:34:13 pm »
+3
Spamming ladders to block entrances is not an intended use of ladders.

My guess is this will either become bannable or impossible pretty soon.

Offline Jarlek

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1173
  • Infamy: 307
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The walking wiki
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jarlek_The_Blue, Jarla, Jarlen, Jarler, Jarlec, Jarled OH GOD ALL THESE ALTS
  • IRC nick: Jarlek
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2011, 07:01:50 pm »
+2
Personally I would like a lowering of c-site health and the introduction of a Barricade.

What, clans are spamming barricades to defend a castle? Well that's what a barricade is FOR! Rawr!

Spamming c-site just looks silly.
This game isn't about being skillful as much as its about saying things in general chat that enrage people who then go to murder you but in their rage they make dumb mistakes which gets them killed.
In memory of Jarlek_zeh_Blue, ruler of Ilvia

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2011, 07:12:09 pm »
+1
Had a quick talk with some of the devs. Probably gonna get fixed.

For now, using ladders to block entrances on siege is not allowed.

You can use weapon racks normally. You know, to get equipment. That is allowed. You can also deploy a ladder or two in siege as defender... to reach somewhere or to to provide some defensive advantage. But not to block doors or entrances. But use common sense please.

Blocking entrances with ladder spam is lame and can be gamebreaking. If you see this kind of misuse, please call in an admin to hand out warnings and temp bans.

Offline Tindel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 333
  • Infamy: 238
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tindel
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2011, 09:16:31 pm »
0
Ladders die really fast

Construction sites have more hp and are way more annoying

Offline Phazey

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Phaz, Merc_Phazh, Merc_Phazhe, Merc_Phazhey and Merc_Phazey
  • IRC nick: Phazh
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2011, 09:42:37 pm »
+1
Personally I would like a lowering of c-site health and the introduction of a Barricade.

What, clans are spamming barricades to defend a castle? Well that's what a barricade is FOR! Rawr!

Spamming c-site just looks silly.

I kinda like the suggestion to be honest. Clearly, people want to be able to barricade and put up defenses. But it can't break the game, if you know what i mean. When it becomes totally impossible for the attackers there is no fun to be had. So the trick would be to create something balanced..

Maybe lowering construction site hp would be a good idea for now?

« Last Edit: October 07, 2011, 10:20:46 pm by Phazey »

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 385
  • Infamy: 1170
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2011, 09:56:54 pm »
0
It seems that most people who play this mod think that ladders are meant to be destroyed 5 seconds after they are used, like they're some coded message...

Offline Gisbert_of_Thuringia

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 169
  • Infamy: 136
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Gisbert_of_Thuringia, Guard_Bernulf_of_Thuringia, Guard_Ranulf_of_Thuringia etc...
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2011, 02:24:03 pm »
0
Can we please expand that on siegeshields as well?

Now that ladderblocking is forbidden, people start blocking everything with siegeshields when an admin says "ladderblocking is forbidden" -.-

It's the same actually: It's not what they are meant for, you can't go around and you can't jump over it or shoot through. And a group of siegeshields still takes some time to destroy them  :rolleyes:


Please forbid that as well so siege is fun again and no constantspamming to get multi

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2011, 02:33:04 pm »
0
Blocking entrances with ladders? That seems hardly efficient, you chop through them quite fast. I think weapon racks should be made forbidden on siege for starters, or code in that there can only be a maximum of 3-4 c-sites simultaneously.

Offline The_Bloody_Nine

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 946
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "I am still alive"
    • View Profile
Re: What about construction spam?
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2011, 02:34:55 pm »
0
Blocking entrances with ladders? That seems hardly efficient, you chop through them quite fast. I think weapon racks should be made forbidden on siege for starters, or code in that there can only be a maximum of 3-4 c-sites simultaneously.
they are organzied and spam like 50 of them. Thats alot of choping.