Conclusion: NA can't block and thus it is unnecessary to use range as a mean of overcoming your opponent.
/endtroll
Srsly tho - I don't get what the issue is - if you're a full str tincan then you are probably going to get fucked by a short, fast, pierce damage wep. If you have a lot of full str tincans (or if full str tincans are dominating the servers in general) - then you are going to see a lot of short, fast pierce damage weapons.
I've duelled becs, I've seen becs in battle, I've used the bec and my opinion is that it is an average weapon (that was before the nerf).
It's short range forces you to facehug your opponent pretty much constantly - crossing out (well, not really but severely limiting) footwork as a mean of overcoming your opponent which means that any decent player is just going to laugh at your pathetic atempts at getting through his blocks. (Only 1h have the speed/animations to do so effectively imo)
Also - while having a short weapon might be an advantage in massive nub clusterfucks - it is a major letdown once you pass a certain degree of battle skill. Having a short weapon in a melee severly limits the amount of targets you can potentially strike at a given time - making you much less lethal in the big picture (look at pikes!).
The bec fills a niche role - if you're a slow-ass spamming tincan with a long, slow weapon well then just accept the fact that the bec is going to be more effective than other weapons against you. If you're an archer, well then high damage, short (makes you run faster) weapons are too going to be more effective vs you than others.
The bec is fine. Well, imo, it's really not and should be buffed back to how it was previously.